Citations (22)
Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.
Read on this site (6)
Jacob B. Rode, Amy L. Dent & Peter H. Ditto. (2023) Climate Change Consensus Messages May Cause Reactance in Conservatives, But There is No Meta-Analytic Evidence That They Backfire. Environmental Communication 17:1, pages 60-66.
Read now
Read now
Sedona Chinn & P. Sol Hart. (2023) Climate Change Consensus Messages Cause Reactance. Environmental Communication 17:1, pages 51-59.
Read now
Read now
Robin Bayes, Toby Bolsen & James N. Druckman. (2023) A Research Agenda for Climate Change Communication and Public Opinion: The Role of Scientific Consensus Messaging and Beyond. Environmental Communication 17:1, pages 16-34.
Read now
Read now
Graham Dixon, Jay Hmielowski & Yanni Ma. (2023) More Evidence of Psychological Reactance to Consensus Messaging: A Response to van der Linden, Maibach, and Leiserowitz (2019). Environmental Communication 17:1, pages 9-15.
Read now
Read now
Nathaniel Geiger, Melanie A. Sarge & Ryan N. Comfort. (2022) An Examination of Expertise, Caring and Salient Value Similarity as Source Factors that Garner Support for Advocated Climate Policies. Environmental Communication 16:6, pages 788-804.
Read now
Read now
Janet K. Swim, Nathaniel Geiger & Joseph G. Guerriero. (2022) Not out of MY bank account! Science messaging when climate change policies carry personal financial costs. Thinking & Reasoning 28:3, pages 346-374.
Read now
Read now
Articles from other publishers (16)
Aart van Stekelenburg, Gabi Schaap, Harm Veling, Jonathan van ’t Riet & Moniek Buijzen. (2022) Scientific-Consensus Communication About Contested Science: A Preregistered Meta-Analysis. Psychological Science 33:12, pages 1989-2008.
Crossref
Crossref
Hyeseung Koh. (2022) Pursuing a uniform effect: Pathways linking exposure to normatively‐focused scientific consensus messages (NFSCMs) to behavioral intention to adopt science. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy 22:3, pages 928-960.
Crossref
Crossref
Matthew H. Goldberg, Abel Gustafson, Sander van der Linden, Seth A. Rosenthal & Anthony Leiserowitz. (2022) Communicating the Scientific Consensus on Climate Change: Diverse Audiences and Effects Over Time. Environment and Behavior 54:7-8, pages 1133-1165.
Crossref
Crossref
Scott Armbruster, Rajesh Manchanda & Ngan Vo. (2022) When Are Loss Frames More Effective in Climate Change Communication? An Application of Fear Appeal Theory. Sustainability 14:12, pages 7411.
Crossref
Crossref
Matthew J. Hornsey, Cassandra M. Chapman & Jacquelyn E. Humphrey. (2022) Climate skepticism decreases when the planet gets hotter and conservative support wanes. Global Environmental Change 74, pages 102492.
Crossref
Crossref
Eugene Y. Chan & Jack Lin. (2022) Political ideology and psychological reactance: how serious should climate change be?. Climatic Change 172:1-2.
Crossref
Crossref
Sacha Altay, Marlène Schwartz, Anne-Sophie Hacquin, Aurélien Allard, Stefaan Blancke & Hugo Mercier. (2022) Scaling up interactive argumentation by providing counterarguments with a chatbot. Nature Human Behaviour 6:4, pages 579-592.
Crossref
Crossref
Michael E. Knapp, Lindsey C. Partington, Ryan T. Hodge, Elisa Ugarte & Paul D. Hastings. (2021) We’re all in this together: Focus on community attenuates effects of pandemic-related financial hardship on reactance to COVID-19 public health regulations. PLOS ONE 16:12, pages e0260782.
Crossref
Crossref
Stephan Lewandowsky, Keri Facer & Ullrich K. H. Ecker. (2021) Losses, hopes, and expectations for sustainable futures after COVID. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 8:1.
Crossref
Crossref
Mikey Biddlestone, Ricky Green, Aleksandra Cichocka, Robbie Sutton & Karen Douglas. (2021) Conspiracy beliefs and the individual, relational, and collective selves. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 15:10.
Crossref
Crossref
DAVID K. SHERMAN, MICHELLE F. SHTEYN, HAHRIE HAN & LEAF VAN BOVEN. (2020) The exchange between citizens and elected officials: a social psychological framework for citizen climate activists. Behavioural Public Policy 5:4, pages 576-605.
Crossref
Crossref
Anandita Sabherwal, Matthew T. Ballew, Sander Linden, Abel Gustafson, Matthew H. Goldberg, Edward W. Maibach, John E. Kotcher, Janet K. Swim, Seth A. Rosenthal & Anthony Leiserowitz. (2021) The Greta Thunberg Effect: Familiarity with Greta Thunberg predicts intentions to engage in climate activism in the United States. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 51:4, pages 321-333.
Crossref
Crossref
N Badullovich, W J Grant & R M Colvin. (2020) Framing climate change for effective communication: a systematic map. Environmental Research Letters 15:12, pages 123002.
Crossref
Crossref
Matthew J. Hornsey & Kelly S. Fielding. (2019) Understanding (and Reducing) Inaction on Climate Change. Social Issues and Policy Review 14:1, pages 3-35.
Crossref
Crossref
Matthew H. Goldberg, Sander van der Linden, Matthew T. Ballew, Seth A. Rosenthal, Abel Gustafson & Anthony Leiserowitz. (2019) The Experience of Consensus: Video as an Effective Medium to Communicate Scientific Agreement on Climate Change. Science Communication 41:5, pages 659-673.
Crossref
Crossref
Sander van der Linden, Anthony Leiserowitz & Edward W. Maibach. (2016) Communicating the Scientific Consensus on Human-Caused Climate Change is an Effective and Depolarizing Public Engagement Strategy: Experimental Evidence from a Large National Replication Study. SSRN Electronic Journal.
Crossref
Crossref