95
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Let’s make a deal: unraveling stakeholder influence on Colorado fracking policy

Pages 267-285 | Received 31 Oct 2014, Accepted 30 Jul 2015, Published online: 21 Aug 2015

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (2)

Stacia S. Ryder & Stephanie A. Malin. (2021) Mechanisms of metapower & procedural injustices in the Colorado Oil and Gas Task Force decision-making process. Critical Policy Studies 15:4, pages 462-485.
Read now
Adam Mayer, Stephanie Malin, Lisa McKenzie, Jennifer Peel & John Adgate. (2021) Understanding Self-Rated Health and Unconventional Oil and Gas Development in Three Colorado Communities. Society & Natural Resources 34:1, pages 60-81.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (6)

Stephanie A. Malin & Stacia S. Ryder. (2023) “A Rigged Process from the Beginning”: Power and Procedural Injustice Within the Colorado Oil and Gas Task Force 1 . Sociological Forum 38:2, pages 324-351.
Crossref
Adam Mayer, Shawn Olson Hazboun & Stephanie Malin. (2020) Reaping Rewards, or Missing out? How Neoliberal Governance and State Growth Machines Condition the Impacts of Oil and Gas Development on Local Well‐Being. Sociological Inquiry 92:S1, pages 733-768.
Crossref
Deserai A. Crow, Elizabeth A. Albright & Elizabeth Koebele. (2019) Evaluating Stakeholder Participation and Influence on State‐Level Rulemaking. Policy Studies Journal 48:4, pages 953-981.
Crossref
Adam Mayer. (2019) Scalar controversies in oil and gas governance: Perspectives on who should regulate the oil and gas industry from policy actors in Colorado and Utah. The Extractive Industries and Society 6:1, pages 94-102.
Crossref
Julia H. Haggerty, Adrianne C. Kroepsch, Kathryn Bills Walsh, Kristin K. Smith & David W. Bowen. (2018) Geographies of Impact and the Impacts of Geography: Unconventional Oil and Gas in the American West. The Extractive Industries and Society 5:4, pages 619-633.
Crossref
Jeffrey J. Cook. (2018) Framing the debate: How interest groups influence draft rules at the United States Environmental Protection Agency. Environmental Policy and Governance 28:3, pages 183-191.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.