Citations (24)
Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.
Read on this site (9)
Exequiel Lacovsky. (2023) Opposing Nuclear Weapons Testing in the Global South: A Comparative Perspective. The International Spectator 58:4, pages 73-90.
Read now
Read now
Ksenija Hanaček & Joan Martinez-Alier. (2022) Nuclear supply chain and environmental justice struggles in Soviet and Post-Soviet countries. Post-Communist Economies 34:7, pages 966-994.
Read now
Read now
Matthew Cotton. (2022) Deep borehole disposal of nuclear waste: trust, cost and social acceptability. Journal of Risk Research 25:5, pages 632-647.
Read now
Read now
Marika Hietala & Robbe Geysmans. (2022) Social sciences and radioactive waste management: acceptance, acceptability, and a persisting socio-technical divide. Journal of Risk Research 25:4, pages 423-438.
Read now
Read now
Su Young Choi. (2021) Resilient peripheralisation through authoritarian communication against energy democracy in South Korea. Environmental Politics 30:6, pages 1002-1023.
Read now
Read now
Jinyoung Park & Benjamin K. Sovacool. (2018) The contested politics of the Asian atom: peripheralisation and nuclear power in South Korea and Japan. Environmental Politics 27:4, pages 686-711.
Read now
Read now
Carmel Anderson & Jacki Schirmer. (2015) An Empirical Investigation of Social Capital and Networks at Local Scale through Resistance to Lower-Carbon Infrastructure. Society & Natural Resources 28:7, pages 749-765.
Read now
Read now
Roman Seidl, Pius Krütli, Corinne Moser & Michael Stauffacher. (2013) Values in the siting of contested infrastructure: the case of repositories for nuclear waste. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences 10:2, pages 107-125.
Read now
Read now
Andrew Blowers. (2011) Why Fukushima is a moral issue? The need for an ethic for the future in the debate about the future of nuclear energy. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences 8:2, pages 73-80.
Read now
Read now
Articles from other publishers (15)
Lucas Schwarz. (2022) Intergenerational justice starts now: Recognizing future generations in nuclear waste management. TATuP - Zeitschrift für Technikfolgenabschätzung in Theorie und Praxis 31:3, pages 37-43.
Crossref
Crossref
Audrey Sérandour, Teva Meyer & Brice Martin. (2022) Territorialiser la gestion du risque nucléaire au Royaume-Uni : une approche politique et géo-légale de la nucléarité de l’espaceTerritorializing nuclear risk management in the United Kingdom: a political and geo-legal approach to spatial nuclearityTerritorializando la gestión del riesgo nuclear en el Reino Unido : una aproximación política y geojurídica a la nuclearidad del espacio. Cybergeo.
Crossref
Crossref
Karen Bickerstaff. (2022) Living on with Sellafield: Nuclear infrastructure, slow violence, and the politics of quiescence. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 47:4, pages 955-970.
Crossref
Crossref
Mito Akiyoshi, John Whitton, Ioan Charnley-Parry & William F. Lawless. 2021. Systems Engineering and Artificial Intelligence. Systems Engineering and Artificial Intelligence
509
533
.
John Dong-Yoon Kim, Eunkyoung Choi & Eungkyoon Lee. (2019) Social justice, fairness and exclusion in the South Korean electricity sector. Energy Research & Social Science 51, pages 55-66.
Crossref
Crossref
Matthew Cotton. (2018) Environmental Justice as Scalar Parity: Lessons From Nuclear Waste Management. Social Justice Research 31:3, pages 238-259.
Crossref
Crossref
Ekaterina Tarasova. (2018) (Non-) Alternative energy transitions: Examining neoliberal rationality in official nuclear energy discourses of Russia and Poland. Energy Research & Social Science 41, pages 128-135.
Crossref
Crossref
Stephen Thomas. (2016) The Hinkley Point decision: An analysis of the policy process. Energy Policy 96, pages 421-431.
Crossref
Crossref
Ilse Oosterlaken. (2014) Applying Value Sensitive Design (VSD) to Wind Turbines and Wind Parks: An Exploration. Science and Engineering Ethics 21:2, pages 359-379.
Crossref
Crossref
Matthew CottonMatthew Cotton. 2014. Ethics and Technology Assessment: A Participatory Approach. Ethics and Technology Assessment: A Participatory Approach
99
128
.
Matthew CottonMatthew Cotton. 2014. Ethics and Technology Assessment: A Participatory Approach. Ethics and Technology Assessment: A Participatory Approach
1
23
.
Carmel Anderson. (2013) The networked minority: How a small group prevailed in a local windfarm conflict. Energy Policy 58, pages 97-108.
Crossref
Crossref
Karen Bickerstaff. (2012) “Because We've Got History Here”: Nuclear Waste, Cooperative Siting, and the Relational Geography of a Complex Issue. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 44:11, pages 2611-2628.
Crossref
Crossref
John Eyles & Jana Fried. (2012) The Anatomy of a Brand: Shaping Nuclear Discourse to Create the Perception of a “Clean World”. Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy 3:1, pages 1-27.
Crossref
Crossref
Göran Sundqvist & Mark Elam. (2012) Public Involvement Designed to Circumvent Public Concern? The “Participatory Turn” in European Nuclear Activities. Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy 1:4, pages 203-229.
Crossref
Crossref