1,692
Views
39
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research articles

Technical safety vs. public involvement? A case study on the unrealized project for the disposal of nuclear waste at Wellenberg (Switzerland)

, , , &
Pages 229-244 | Received 01 Mar 2010, Accepted 05 Jul 2010, Published online: 14 Sep 2010

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (8)

Matthew Cotton. (2022) Deep borehole disposal of nuclear waste: trust, cost and social acceptability. Journal of Risk Research 25:5, pages 632-647.
Read now
Shoji Ohtomo, Yukio Hirose & Susumu Ohnuma. (2021) Public acceptance model for siting a repository of radioactive contaminated waste. Journal of Risk Research 24:2, pages 215-227.
Read now
Céline Parotte & Pierre Delvenne. (2015) Taming uncertainty: towards a new governance approach for nuclear waste management in Belgium. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 27:8, pages 986-998.
Read now
Corinne Moser, Michael Stauffacher, Yann B. Blumer & Roland W. Scholz. (2015) From risk to vulnerability: the role of perceived adaptive capacity for the acceptance of contested infrastructure. Journal of Risk Research 18:5, pages 622-636.
Read now
Roman Seidl, Pius Krütli, Corinne Moser & Michael Stauffacher. (2013) Values in the siting of contested infrastructure: the case of repositories for nuclear waste. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences 10:2, pages 107-125.
Read now
Samantha Scholte, Eleftheria Vasileiadou & ArthurC Petersen. (2013) Opening up the societal debate on climate engineering: how newspaper frames are changing. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences 10:1, pages 1-16.
Read now
Corinne Moser, Michael Stauffacher, Pius Krütli & Roland W. Scholz. (2012) The influence of linear and cyclical temporal representations on risk perception of nuclear waste: an experimental study. Journal of Risk Research 15:5, pages 459-476.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (31)

Sophie Kuppler, Anne Eckhardt & Peter Hocke. 2023. The Future of Radioactive Waste Governance. The Future of Radioactive Waste Governance 169 198 .
Thomas FlüelerThomas Flüeler. 2023. Governance of Radioactive Waste, Special Waste and Carbon Storage. Governance of Radioactive Waste, Special Waste and Carbon Storage 81 100 .
Roland W. Scholz & Gerald Steiner. (2022) The role of transdisciplinarity for mineral economics and mineral resource management: coping with fallacies related to phosphorus in science and practice. Mineral Economics 35:3-4, pages 745-763.
Crossref
Lucas Schwarz. (2022) Is It All about a Science-Informed Decision? A Quantitative Approach to Three Dimensions of Justice and Their Relation in the Nuclear Waste Repository Siting Process in Germany. Societies 12:6, pages 179.
Crossref
Matti Kojo, Tuuli Vilhunen, Mika Kari, Tapio Litmanen & Markku Lehtonen. (2022) The Art of Being Ethical and Responsible: Print Media Debate on Final Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel in Finland and Sweden. Social Justice Research 35:2, pages 157-187.
Crossref
Lu Liu, Thijs Bouman, Goda Perlaviciute & Linda Steg. (2021) The more public influence, the better? The effects of full versus shared influence on public acceptability of energy projects in the Netherlands and China. Energy Research & Social Science 81, pages 102286.
Crossref
Lu Liu, Thijs Bouman, Goda Perlaviciute & Linda Steg. (2020) Public participation in decision making, perceived procedural fairness and public acceptability of renewable energy projects. Energy and Climate Change 1, pages 100013.
Crossref
Franziska Ruef, Michael Stauffacher & Olivier Ejderyan. (2020) Blind spots of participation: How differently do geothermal energy managers and residents understand participation?. Energy Reports 6, pages 1950-1962.
Crossref
HyungBin Moon & JongRoul Woo. (2020) Managing spent nuclear fuel in South Korea: Heterogeneous public attitudes toward different management strategies at individual‐ and segment levels. International Journal of Energy Research 44:10, pages 8037-8052.
Crossref
Maria Rosaria Di Nucci & Achim Brunnengräber. 2019. Conflicts, Participation and Acceptability in Nuclear Waste Governance. Conflicts, Participation and Acceptability in Nuclear Waste Governance 3 19 .
Rider W. Foley, Arnim Wiek, Braden Kay & Richard Rushforth. (2016) Ideal and reality of multi-stakeholder collaboration on sustainability problems: a case study on a large-scale industrial contamination in Phoenix, Arizona. Sustainability Science 12:1, pages 123-136.
Crossref
Herman W.A. van Os, Rien Herber & Bert Scholtens. (2016) Subsurface activities and decision support systems. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 60, pages 176-185.
Crossref
Arnim Wiek & Daniel J. Lang. 2016. Sustainability Science. Sustainability Science 31 41 .
Yann B. Blumer, Corinne Moser, Anthony Patt & Roman Seidl. (2015) The precarious consensus on the importance of energy security: Contrasting views between Swiss energy users and experts. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 52, pages 927-936.
Crossref
Roland W. Scholz & Gerald Steiner. (2015) The real type and ideal type of transdisciplinary processes: part II—what constraints and obstacles do we meet in practice?. Sustainability Science 10:4, pages 653-671.
Crossref
Roland W. Scholz & Gerald Steiner. (2015) The real type and ideal type of transdisciplinary processes: part I—theoretical foundations. Sustainability Science 10:4, pages 527-544.
Crossref
Peter Hocke & Sophie Kuppler. 2015. Nuclear Waste Governance. Nuclear Waste Governance 157 176 .
Charlene Xie, Yang Liu & Sheng-xiang She. (2014) A behavioral study on the value of elasticity of marginal utility in environmental risks. A behavioral study on the value of elasticity of marginal utility in environmental risks.
Goda Perlaviciute & Linda Steg. (2014) Contextual and psychological factors shaping evaluations and acceptability of energy alternatives: Integrated review and research agenda. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 35, pages 361-381.
Crossref
Yang Liu, Charlene Xie & Shengxiang She. (2014) Perception of delayed environmental risks: beyond time discounting. Disaster Prevention and Management 23:2, pages 112-122.
Crossref
Corinne Moser, Michael Stauffacher, Timo Smieszek, Roman Seidl, Pius Krütli & Roland W. Scholz. (2013) Psychological factors in discounting negative impacts of nuclear waste. Journal of Environmental Psychology 35, pages 121-131.
Crossref
Roman Seidl, Corinne Moser, Michael Stauffacher & Pius Krütli. (2012) Perceived Risk and Benefit of Nuclear Waste Repositories: Four Opinion Clusters. Risk Analysis 33:6, pages 1038-1048.
Crossref
Clair Gough & Philip Boucher. (2013) Ethical attitudes to underground CO2 storage: Points of convergence and potential faultlines. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 13, pages 156-167.
Crossref
Roman Seidl, Fridolin Simon Brand, Michael Stauffacher, Pius Krütli, Quang Bao Le, Andy Spörri, Grégoire Meylan, Corinne Moser, Monica Berger González & Roland Werner Scholz. (2013) Science with Society in the Anthropocene. AMBIO 42:1, pages 5-12.
Crossref
Vivianne H.M. Visschers & Michael Siegrist. (2012) Fair play in energy policy decisions: Procedural fairness, outcome fairness and acceptance of the decision to rebuild nuclear power plants. Energy Policy 46, pages 292-300.
Crossref
Pius Krütli, Michael Stauffacher, Dario Pedolin, Corinne Moser & Roland W. Scholz. (2012) The Process Matters: Fairness in Repository Siting For Nuclear Waste. Social Justice Research 25:1, pages 79-101.
Crossref
Daniel J. Lang, Arnim Wiek, Matthias Bergmann, Michael Stauffacher, Pim Martens, Peter Moll, Mark Swilling & Christopher J. Thomas. (2012) Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges. Sustainability Science 7:S1, pages 25-43.
Crossref
Corinne Moser, Michael Stauffacher, Pius Krütli & Roland W. Scholz. (2011) The Crucial Role of Nomothetic and Idiographic Conceptions of Time: Interdisciplinary Collaboration in Nuclear Waste Management. Risk Analysis 32:1, pages 138-154.
Crossref
Michael Stauffacher, Pius Krütli, Thomas Flüeler & Roland W. Scholz. 2012. Tackling Long-Term Global Energy Problems. Tackling Long-Term Global Energy Problems 227 245 .
Danielle M. Tendall & Claudia R. Binder. (2011) Nuclear Energy in Europe: Uranium Flow Modeling and Fuel Cycle Scenario Trade-Offs from a Sustainability Perspective. Environmental Science & Technology 45:6, pages 2442-2449.
Crossref
Samantha Scholte, Eleftheria Vasileiadou & Arthur Petersen. (2012) Opening Up the Societal Debate on Climate Engineering: How Newspaper Frames are Changing. SSRN Electronic Journal.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.