Hermas Abudu, Presley K. WessehJr.Jr. & Boqiang Lin. (2023) Does political propaganda matter in mitigating climate change? Insights from the United States of America. Journal of Management Science and Engineering 8:3, pages 386-397.
Crossref

Tatyana Bajenova. (2023) The Role of European Think Tanks as a Channel of the EU Public Diplomacy Towards Domestic and Foreign Publics. Politics and Governance 11:3, pages 200-212.
Crossref

. 2023. Development and Territorial Restructuring in an Era of Global Change. Development and Territorial Restructuring in an Era of Global Change 243 259 .

Núria Almiron, Jose A. Moreno & Justin Farrell. (2022) Climate change contrarian think tanks in Europe: A network analysis. Public Understanding of Science 32:3, pages 268-283.
Crossref

Hendrik Theine & Livia Regen. 2023. APCC Special Report: Strukturen für ein klimafreundliches Leben. APCC Special Report: Strukturen für ein klimafreundliches Leben 547 566 .

Christian May, Daniel Mertens, Andreas Nölke & Michael SchedelikChristian May, Daniel Mertens, Andreas Nölke & Michael Schedelik. 2023. Politische Ökonomie. Politische Ökonomie 285 312 .

Ruth E. McKieRuth E. McKie. 2023. The Climate Change Counter Movement. The Climate Change Counter Movement 139 167 .

Jaakko Kauko. (2022) Politics of evidence: Think tanks and the Academies Act. British Educational Research Journal 48:6, pages 1232-1253.
Crossref

Laura D. Young & Erin B. Fitz. (2021) Who are the 3 Per Cent? The Connections Among Climate Change Contrarians. British Journal of Political Science 52:4, pages 1503-1522.
Crossref

Julien Landry. (2021) Do Business-Backed Think Tanks Represent Class Interests? The Co-evolution of Policy Learning and Economic Elites in the Canadian Knowledge Regime. Administration & Society 54:7, pages 1305-1327.
Crossref

Guillaume Lamy. (2022) Recherche ou lobbyisme ?. Politique et Sociétés 41:3, pages 129.
Crossref

Guillaume Lamy & Stéphanie Yates. (2022) Introduction. Politique et Sociétés 41:3, pages 3.
Crossref

Julien Landry. (2022) Aux marges de la recherche et de la politique : la nature et les limites de la figure du think tank. Politique et Sociétés 41:3, pages 47.
Crossref

Aron Buzogány & Christoph Mohamad-Klotzbach. 2022. The Palgrave Handbook of Populism. The Palgrave Handbook of Populism 321 340 .

Jan Krajhanzl & Tomáš Chabada. (2021) Comparing public support for wildlife protection and climate protection. Envigogika 16:2.
Crossref

Ruth E. McKie. (2021) Obstruction, delay, and transnationalism: Examining the online climate change counter-movement. Energy Research & Social Science 80, pages 102217.
Crossref

Robert J. Brulle. (2019) Networks of Opposition: A Structural Analysis of U.S. Climate Change Countermovement Coalitions 1989–2015. Sociological Inquiry 91:3, pages 603-624.
Crossref

Anna Tyllström & John Murray. (2019) Lobbying the Client: The role of policy intermediaries in corporate political activity. Organization Studies 42:6, pages 971-991.
Crossref

Núria Almiron & Laura Fernández. (2021) Including the animal standpoint in critical public relations research. Public Relations Inquiry 10:2, pages 139-161.
Crossref

Mehmet Münip BABUR. (2021) Bilginin Ticarileşmesi: Düşünce KuruluşlarıThe Knowledge Commercialization: Think Tanks. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi:68, pages 106-132.
Crossref

Markus Mykkänen & Neil Freshwater. (2021) Typology of think tanks: A comparative study in Finland and Scotland. Academicus International Scientific Journal 23, pages 72-90.
Crossref

Francesca Colli & Bart Kerremans. 2021. The Contestation of Expertise in the European Union. The Contestation of Expertise in the European Union 67 90 .

Núria Almiron, Maxwell Boykoff, Marta Narberhaus & Francisco Heras. (2020) Dominant counter-frames in influential climate contrarian European think tanks. Climatic Change 162:4, pages 2003-2020.
Crossref

Andrew Watterson & William Dinan. (2020) Lagging and Flagging: Air Pollution, Shale Gas Exploration and the Interaction of Policy, Science, Ethics and Environmental Justice in England. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17:12, pages 4320.
Crossref

. 2020. Abondance et liberté. Abondance et liberté 429 451 .

Miguel Rodriguez, Mario Pansera & Pablo Cabanelas Lorenzo. (2020) Do indicators have politics? A review of the use of energy and carbon intensity indicators in public debates. Journal of Cleaner Production 243, pages 118602.
Crossref

Ruth E. McKie. (2018) Climate Change Counter Movement Neutralization Techniques: A Typology to Examine the Climate Change Counter Movement. Sociological Inquiry 89:2, pages 288-316.
Crossref

Daniel Witte & Andreas Schmitz. 2019. Netzwerke in gesellschaftlichen Feldern. Netzwerke in gesellschaftlichen Feldern 25 61 .

Karin Edvardsson Björnberg, Mikael Karlsson, Michael Gilek & Sven Ove Hansson. (2017) Climate and environmental science denial: A review of the scientific literature published in 1990–2015. Journal of Cleaner Production 167, pages 229-241.
Crossref

Julia Smith, Sheryl Thompson & Kelley Lee. (2017) The atlas network: a “strategic ally” of the tobacco industry. The International Journal of Health Planning and Management 32:4, pages 433-448.
Crossref

Stephan Lewandowsky, Michael E. Mann, Nicholas J. L. Brown & Harris Friedman. (2016) Science and the public: Debate, denial, and skepticism. Journal of Social and Political Psychology 4:2, pages 537-553.
Crossref

Eric Bonds. (2016) Beyond Denialism: Think Tank Approaches to Climate Change. Sociology Compass 10:4, pages 306-317.
Crossref

Ricard Parrilla, Núria Almiron & Jordi Xifra. (2015) Crisis and Interest. American Behavioral Scientist 60:3, pages 340-359.
Crossref

Jordi Xifra. (2015) Climate Change Deniers and Advocacy. American Behavioral Scientist 60:3, pages 276-287.
Crossref

Edouard MorenaEdouard Morena. 2016. The Price of Climate Action. The Price of Climate Action 1 22 .

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Share icon
Back to Top

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.

People also read
Recommended articles
Cited by

To cite this article:

Reference style: APA Chicago Harvard

Citation copied to clipboard

Reference styles above use APA (6th edition), Chicago (16th edition) & Harvard (10th edition)

Download citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by citation management software including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks and Reference Manager.

Choose format: RIS BibTex RefWorks Direct Export

Choose options: Citation Citation & abstract Citation & references

Think tank networks and the knowledge–interest nexus: the case of climate change

Articles from other publishers (35)

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Your download is now in progress and you may close this window

Login or register to access this feature