1,285
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Does BBIC make a difference? Structured assessment of child protection and support

&

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (7)

Gunnel Östlund, Philip Rautell Lindstedt, Baran Cürüklü & Helena Blomberg. (2023) Developing welfare technology to increase children’s participation in child welfare assessments: an empirical case in Sweden. European Journal of Social Work 0:0, pages 1-14.
Read now
Andreas Møller Jørgensen, Maria Appel Nissen, Jochen Devlieghere & Philip Gillingham. (2022) Social work technologies. Nordic Social Work Research 12:3, pages 323-327.
Read now
David Matscheck & Katarina Piuva. (2022) Integrated care for individuals with mental illness and substance abuse – the example of the coordinated individual plan in Sweden. European Journal of Social Work 25:2, pages 341-354.
Read now
Mikael Skillmark & Verner Denvall. (2018) The standardizers: social workers’ role when implementing assessment tools in the Swedish social services. Nordic Social Work Research 8:1, pages 88-99.
Read now
Maria Appel Nissen & Maria Eriksson. (2016) Editorial. Nordic Social Work Research 6:1, pages 1-3.
Read now
Karmen Toros, Michael C. LaSala & Marju Medar. (2015) Assessment of Children in Need in a Post-Soviet Context: Reflections of Child Protective Workers in Estonia. Journal of Family Social Work 18:4, pages 267-287.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (8)

Jerry Norlin & Eva Randell. (2022) Social workers’ perceptions of assessing the parental capacity of parents with intellectual disabilities in child protection investigations. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities 27:4, pages 976-993.
Crossref
Therése Wissö, Anna Melke & Irene Josephson. (2021) Social workers’ constructions of parents to children in foster care. Qualitative Social Work 21:4, pages 748-764.
Crossref
Marina Snipsøyr Sletten. 2021. Standardised practice in Norwegian child welfare services: How standardisation influences professional practice in child welfare services. Standardised practice in Norwegian child welfare services: How standardisation influences professional practice in child welfare services.
Henrik Karlsson, Gunilla Avby & Tore Svendsen. (2020) Quality of the analysis—A performance management system for the analytical stage of child‐protection investigations. Child & Family Social Work 25:4, pages 856-864.
Crossref
Henrik Karlsson, Gunilla Avby & Tore Svendsen. (2018) QUAT—a Tool for Evaluating the Quality of Core Assessments in Child-Protection Investigations. The British Journal of Social Work.
Crossref
Pia Tham. (2018) A Professional Role in Transition: Swedish Child Welfare Social Workers’ Descriptions of Their Work in 2003 and 2014. The British Journal of Social Work 48:2, pages 449-467.
Crossref
Zlatana Knezevic. (2017) Amoral, im/moral and dis/loyal: Children’s moral status in child welfare. Childhood 24:4, pages 470-484.
Crossref
Karmen Toros, Michael C. LaSala & Anne Tiko. (2017) Assessment of the developmental needs of children in need: Estonian child protective workers' case reflections. Child & Family Social Work 22:2, pages 843-852.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.