https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6611-4583
Citations (6)
Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.
Read on this site (3)
Jesse L. Reynolds, Eric B. Kennedy & Jonathan Symons. (2023) If deliberation is the answer, what is the question? Objectives and evaluation of public participation and engagement in science and technology. Journal of Responsible Innovation 10:1.
Read now
Read now
Kathryn A. Stofer, David Hanson & Kirsten Hecht. (2023) Scientists need professional development to practice meaningful public engagement. Journal of Responsible Innovation 10:1.
Read now
Read now
Shannon N. Conley & Emily York. (2020) Public engagement in contested political contexts: reflections on the role of recursive reflexivity in responsible innovation. Journal of Responsible Innovation 7:sup1, pages 1-12.
Read now
Read now
Articles from other publishers (3)
Fernando Marmolejo-Ramos, Thomas Workman, Clint Walker, Don Lenihan, Sarah Moulds, Juan C. Correa, Anca M. Hanea & Belona Sonna. (2022) AI-powered narrative building for facilitating public participation and engagement. Discover Artificial Intelligence 2:1.
Crossref
Crossref
Adam E. Kokotovich, Jennifer Kuzma, Christopher L. Cummings & Khara Grieger. (2021) Responsible Innovation Definitions, Practices, and Motivations from Nanotechnology Researchers in Food and Agriculture. NanoEthics 15:3, pages 229-243.
Crossref
Crossref
Ankita Rathore & G. Mahesh. (2021) Public perception of nanotechnology: A contrast between developed and developing countries. Technology in Society 67, pages 101751.
Crossref
Crossref