Citations (18)
Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.
Read on this site (5)
Branko Anđić, Stanko Cvjetićanin, Zsolt Lavicza, Mirjana Maričić, Tatjana Novović & Danijela Stešević. (2021) Mobile and printed dichotomous keys in constructivist learning of biology in primary school. Research in Science & Technological Education 39:4, pages 393-420.
Read now
Read now
Hasan Ozgur Kapici, Hakan Akcay & Ton de Jong. (2020) How do different laboratory environments influence students’ attitudes toward science courses and laboratories?. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 52:4, pages 534-549.
Read now
Read now
HyeRan Park, Samia Khan & Stephen Petrina. (2009) ICT in Science Education: A quasi‐experimental study of achievement, attitudes toward science, and career aspirations of Korean middle school students. International Journal of Science Education 31:8, pages 993-1012.
Read now
Read now
Norman Reid. (2006) Thoughts on attitude measurement. Research in Science & Technological Education 24:1, pages 3-27.
Read now
Read now
Jerome Thompson & Kola Soyibo. (2002) Effects of Lecture, Teacher Demonstrations, Discussion and Practical Work on 10th Graders' Attitudes to Chemistry and Understanding of Electrolysis. Research in Science & Technological Education 20:1, pages 25-37.
Read now
Read now
Articles from other publishers (13)
Kaley Lesperance, Sarah Hofer, Jan Retelsdorf & Doris Holzberger. (2022) Reducing gender differences in student motivational‐affective factors: A meta‐analysis of school‐based interventions. British Journal of Educational Psychology 92:4, pages 1502-1536.
Crossref
Crossref
Avi Hofstein & Muhamad Hugerat. 2021. Teaching and Learning in the School Chemistry Laboratory. Teaching and Learning in the School Chemistry Laboratory
46
90
.
M Haviz. (2018) Computer-assisted Biology Learning Materials: Designing and Developing an Interactive CD on Spermatogenesis. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 335, pages 012081.
Crossref
Crossref
Jana Laganis, Kristina Prosen & Gregor Torkar. (2017) Classroom versus Outdoor Biology Education Using a Woody Species Identification Digital Dichotomous Key. Natural Sciences Education 46:1, pages 160032.
Crossref
Crossref
Antonia Vassilopoulou & Evangelia Mavrikaki. (2016) Can ICT in biology courses improve AD/HD students’ achievement?. Improving Schools 19:3, pages 246-257.
Crossref
Crossref
Omer FarukSozcu, ErkanTaskın, Ismail Ipek, Mustafa Simsek & Hüseyin Kınay. (2015) Investigating Turkey High School Graduates’ Attitudes towards Technology. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 191, pages 1416-1422.
Crossref
Crossref
Susana Olmos, Juanjo Mena, Eva Torrecilla & Ana Iglesias. (2015) Improving graduate students learning through the use of Moodle. Educational Research and Reviews 10:5, pages 604-614.
Crossref
Crossref
Levent Çelik. (2010) Evaluation of the views of pre-service teachers taught with Moodle during the course named “instructional technology and material design” on the use of teaching materials. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 9, pages 1793-1797.
Crossref
Crossref
Hasan Gürbüz, Mustafa Kışoğlu, Mehmet Erkol, Ali Alaş & Sakıp Kahraman. (2010) The effect of PowerPoint presentations prepared and presented by prospective teachers on biology achievement and attitudes toward biology. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 2:2, pages 3043-3047.
Crossref
Crossref
Pavol Prokop, Gaye Tuncer & Radoslav Kvasničák. (2007) Short-Term Effects of Field Programme on Students’ Knowledge and Attitude Toward Biology: a Slovak Experience. Journal of Science Education and Technology 16:3, pages 247-255.
Crossref
Crossref
Mridula D. Ranade. (2006) Development of CAI Presentations for Science Teaching and Overview of Research Findings. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 4:4, pages 763-789.
Crossref
Crossref
Sibel Balci, Jale Cakiroglu & Ceren Tekkaya. (2006) Engagement, exploration, explanation, extension, and evaluation (5E) learning cycle and conceptual change text as learning tools. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education 34:3, pages 199-203.
Crossref
Crossref
Salih Çepni, Erol Taş & Sacit Köse. (2006) The effects of computer-assisted material on students’ cognitive levels, misconceptions and attitudes towards science. Computers & Education 46:2, pages 192-205.
Crossref
Crossref