Citations (33)
Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.
Read on this site (15)
Murat Doğanlar, Oktay Kızılkaya & Faruk Mike. (2020) Testing the long-run PPP for Turkey: new evidence from the Fourier quantile unit root test. Applied Economics Letters 27:9, pages 729-735.
Read now
Read now
Zeynel Abidin Ozdemir & Emre Aksoy. (2015) Are real exchanges rate series really persistent?: evidence from three commonwealth of independent states countries. Applied Economics 47:40, pages 4299-4309.
Read now
Read now
Qaiser Munir & Sook Ching Kok. (2015) Purchasing Power Parity of ASEAN-5 Countries Revisited: Heterogeneity, Structural Breaks and Cross-sectional Dependence. Global Economic Review 44:1, pages 116-149.
Read now
Read now
Bulent Guloglu, Serdar Ispira & Deniz Okat. (2011) Testing the validity of quasi PPP hypothesis: evidence from a recent panel unit root test with structural breaks. Applied Economics Letters 18:18, pages 1817-1822.
Read now
Read now
Saadet Kasman, Adnan Kasman & Duygu Ayhan. (2010) Testing the Purchasing Power Parity Hypothesis for the New Member and Candidate Countries of the European Union: Evidence from Lagrange Multiplier Unit Root Tests with Structural Breaks. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 46:2, pages 53-65.
Read now
Read now
Murat Doğanlar, Harun Bal & Mehmet Özmen. (2009) Testing long-run validity of purchasing power parity for selected emerging market economies. Applied Economics Letters 16:14, pages 1443-1448.
Read now
Read now
Erdinc Telatar & Mübariz Hasanov. (2009) Purchasing Power Parity in transition economies: evidence from the Commonwealth of Independent States. Post-Communist Economies 21:2, pages 157-173.
Read now
Read now
Hüseyin Kalyoncu. (2009) New evidence of the validity of purchasing power parity from Turkey. Applied Economics Letters 16:1, pages 63-67.
Read now
Read now
Zeynel Abidin Ozdemir. (2008) The purchasing power parity hypothesis in Turkey: evidence from nonlinear STAR error correction models. Applied Economics Letters 15:4, pages 307-311.
Read now
Read now
Tastan Hüseyin. (2005) Do real exchange rates contain a unit root? Evidence from Turkish data. Applied Economics 37:17, pages 2037-2053.
Read now
Read now
Joseph D. Alba
& Donghyun Park. (2005) Non-linear mean reversion of real exchange rates and purchasing power parity: some evidence from Turkey. Applied Economics Letters 12:11, pages 701-704.
Read now
Read now
Haluk Erlat. (2004) Unit roots or nonlinear stationarity in Turkish real exchange rates. Applied Economics Letters 11:10, pages 645-650.
Read now
Read now
Erdal Özmen
& Aysun Gökcan. (2004) Deviations from PPP and UIP in a financially open economy: the Turkish evidence. Applied Financial Economics 14:11, pages 779-784.
Read now
Read now
M. Ege Yazgan. (2003) The purchasing power parity hypothesis for a high inflation country: a re-examination of the case of Turkey. Applied Economics Letters 10:3, pages 143-147.
Read now
Read now
Lucio Sarno. (2000) Real exchange rate behaviour in high inflation countries: empirical evidence from Turkey, 1980-1997. Applied Economics Letters 7:5, pages 285-291.
Read now
Read now
Articles from other publishers (18)
Waqar Khalid, Irfan Civcir, Hüseyin Özdeşer & Javed Iqbal. (2023) The asymmetric impact of real exchange rate misalignment on growth dynamics in Turkey. Journal of Policy Modeling 45:6, pages 1184-1203.
Crossref
Crossref
Mehmet Sedat UĞUR & Ali Eren ALPER. (2023) Revisiting Purchasing Power Parity in OECD Countries: New Evidence from Nonlinear Unit Root Test with Structural BreaksOECD Ülkelerinde Satın Alma Gücü Paritesinin İncelenmesi: Doğrusal Olmayan Yapısal Kırılmalı Birim Kök Testinden Yeni Kanıtlar. Sosyoekonomi 31:57, pages 25-45.
Crossref
Crossref
Kadir Y. Eryiğit & Veli Durmuşoğlu. 2022. Advances in Econometrics, Operational Research, Data Science and Actuarial Studies. Advances in Econometrics, Operational Research, Data Science and Actuarial Studies
63
79
.
Tuncer GÖVDELİ & Serpil SUMER. (2021) TESTING THE PURCHASING POWER PARITY HYPOTHESIS FOR BRICS: EVIDENCE FROM THE FOURIER UNIT ROOT AND COINTEGRATION TESTBRICS İÇİN SATIN ALMA GÜCÜ PARİTESİ HİPOTEZİNİN TEST EDİLMESİ: FOURIER BİRİM KÖK VE EŞBÜTÜNLEŞME TESTİNDEN KANIT. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 8:3, pages 1394-1406.
Crossref
Crossref
Süreyya İMRE. (2021) THE VALIDITY OF THE PURCHASING POWER PARITY HYPOTHESIS IN OECD COUNTRIES: EVIDENCE FROM THE FOURIER TEST / OECD Ülkelerinde Satın Alma Gücü Paritesi Hipotezinin Geçerliliği: Fourier Testinden KanıtlarTHE VALIDITY OF THE PURCHASING POWER PARITY HYPOTHESIS IN OECD COUNTRIES: EVIDENCE FROM THE FOURIER TEST / OECD Ülkelerinde Satın Alma Gücü Paritesi Hipotezinin Geçerliliği: Fourier Testinden Kanıtlar. Uluslararası Ekonomi İşletme ve Politika Dergisi 5:2, pages 274-289.
Crossref
Crossref
Abdulla Hil Mamun, Harun Bal & Shahanara Basher. (2020) Does currency misalignment matter for economic growth? – Evidence from Turkey. EuroMed Journal of Business 16:4, pages 471-486.
Crossref
Crossref
İsmail KOÇAK & Sefa ÖZBEK. (2020) SATIN ALMA GÜCÜ PARİTESİNİN GEÇERLİLİĞİ: DURAĞANLIK VE BİRİM KÖK TESTLERİNDEN YENİ KANITLAR. Uluslararası Ticaret ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi 4:1, pages 22-31.
Crossref
Crossref
Selma BÜYÜKKANTARCI TOLGAY & Ferit KULA. (2020) Satın Alma Gücü Paritesinin Geleneksel Olmayan Para Politikaları Altında Geçerliliği: Türkiye Üzerine Bir UygulamaPurchasing Power of Non-Conventional Monetary Policy Under Validity of Parity: An Applicatıon on Turkey. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi:55, pages 1-20.
Crossref
Crossref
Mehmet SONGUR. (2019) YAPISAL KIRILMALAR ALTINDA SATIN ALMA GÜCÜ PARİTESİ HİPOTEZİNİN GEÇERLİLİĞİ: AVRASYA ÜLKELERİ ÖRNEĞİTHE VALIDITY OF THE PURCHASING POWER PARITY HYPOTHESIS UNDER STRUCTURAL BREAKS: THE CASE OF EURASIAN COUNTRIES. Bingöl Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 9:17, pages 567-586.
Crossref
Crossref
Dilem Yıldırım. (2017) Empirical investigation of purchasing power parity for Turkey: Evidence from recent nonlinear unit root tests. Central Bank Review 17:2, pages 39-45.
Crossref
Crossref
Kadir Karagöz & T. Bahadır Saraç. (2016) Testing the Validity of PPP Theory for Turkey: Nonlinear Unit Root Testing. Procedia Economics and Finance 38, pages 458-467.
Crossref
Crossref
Ugur Adiguzel, Ahmet Sahbaz, Ceyhun Can Ozcan & Saban Nazlioglu. (2014) The behavior of Turkish exchange rates: A panel data perspective. Economic Modelling 42, pages 177-185.
Crossref
Crossref
Mohsen Bahmani-Oskooee & Scott W. Hegerty. (2009) PURCHASING POWER PARITY IN LESS-DEVELOPED AND TRANSITION ECONOMIES: A REVIEW PAPER. Journal of Economic Surveys 23:4, pages 617-658.
Crossref
Crossref
Huseyin Kalyoncu & Kahraman Kalyoncu. (2008) Purchasing power parity in OECD countries: Evidence from panel unit root. Economic Modelling 25:3, pages 440-445.
Crossref
Crossref
Anis Chowdhury & Girijasankar Mallik. (1998) A Land Locked Into Low Inflation – How Far is the Promised Land?. Economic Analysis and Policy 28:2, pages 233-244.
Crossref
Crossref
Simón Javier Sosvilla Rivero & Emma Garcia. (2003) Purchasing Power Parity Revisited. SSRN Electronic Journal.
Crossref
Crossref
Engin Kucukkaya, Ugur Soytas & Ramazan Sari. (2007) Assessing the Value of the (New) Turkish Lira. SSRN Electronic Journal.
Crossref
Crossref
UUur Addggzel, Ahmet AHBAZ, Ceyhun Can OZCAN & aban Nazlloolu. (2014) The Behavior of Turkish Exchange Rates: A Panel Data Perspective. SSRN Electronic Journal.
Crossref
Crossref
![Supercharge Your Next Research Paper: Research and write your next paper with Jenni AI.]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/112445/Skyscraper-econ.png"})