4
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Conversion factor for comparison of data from Humphrey and Medmont automated perimeters

(MOptom FCLSA) , (PhD FAAO) , (BOptom) , (BOptom) & (BOptom)
Pages 11-13 | Received 19 Apr 2010, Accepted 03 Sep 1998, Published online: 15 Apr 2021

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (1)

Jack Phu, Sieu K Khuu, Michael Yapp, Nagi Assaad, Michael P Hennessy & Michael Kalloniatis. (2017) The value of visual field testing in the era of advanced imaging: clinical and psychophysical perspectives. Clinical and Experimental Optometry 100:4, pages 313-332.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (2)

John Graham Pearce & Ted Maddess. (2016) Retest Variability in the Medmont M700 Automated Perimeter. Optometry and Vision Science 93:3, pages 272-280.
Crossref
John LandersAlok SharmaIvan Goldberg & Stuart L Graham. (2010) Comparison of visual field sensitivities between the Medmont automated perimeter and the Humphrey field analyser. Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology 38:3, pages 273-276.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.