Joanne R. Rogers & Barry J. Fraser. (2022) Sex and frequency of practical work as determinants of middle-school science students’ learning environment perceptions and attitudes. Learning Environments Research 26:2, pages 315-336.
Crossref
José Jefferson da Silva & Geneci Cavalcanti Moura de Medeiros. (2023) O uso da sequência didática no ensino de Física: A inserção dos estudantes da Escola Estadual Tabelião Júlio Maria, Touros-RN. Brazilian Journal of Science 2:9, pages 70-75.
Crossref
Nguyen Duc Dat, Nguyen Van Bien & Simon Kraus. (2023) The Impact of the Curriculum on Pre-service Physics Teachers’ Nature of Science Conceptions. Science & Education.
Crossref
Sharon Ince, Christopher Hoadley & Paul Kirschner. (2022) Collaborative technology practices in social science early career scholarly research workflows. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, pages 096100062211401.
Crossref
Bing Wei, Zhimeng Jiang & Lichun Gai. (2021) Examining the Nature of Practical Work in School Science Textbooks: Coverage of the Diversity of Scientific Methods. Science & Education 31:4, pages 943-960.
Crossref
Yu-Liang Ting, Shin-Ping Tsai, Yaming Tai & Teng-Hui Tseng. (2022) Tackling the Challenges of Acquiring Web Videos for STEM Hands-On Learning. International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design 12:3, pages 1-16.
Crossref
Thiago Caetano, Mikael Frank Rezende Junior, Agenor Pina da Silva & Camila Cardoso Moreira. (2022) The physics remote laboratory: implementation of an experiment on standing waves. European Journal of Physics 43:2, pages 025801.
Crossref
Yu-Liang Ting, Shin-Ping Tsai, Yaming Tai & Teng-Hui Tseng. 2022. Learning and Collaboration Technologies. Designing the Learner and Teacher Experience. Learning and Collaboration Technologies. Designing the Learner and Teacher Experience
140
153
.
Markus Emden. (2021) Reintroducing “the” Scientific Method to Introduce Scientific Inquiry in Schools?. Science & Education 30:5, pages 1037-1073.
Crossref
Hasan Zuhtu Okulu & Ayse Oguz-Unver. (2021) The Development and Evaluation of a Tool to Determine the Characteristics of STEM Activities. European Journal of STEM Education 6:1, pages 06.
Crossref
Lennart Moheit, Johannes D. Schmid, Jonas M. Schmid, Martin Eser & Steffen Marburg. (2021) Acoustics Apps: Interactive simulations for digital teaching and learning of acoustics. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 149:2, pages 1175-1182.
Crossref
Markus Emden & Mario Gerwig. (2020) Can Faraday's The Chemical History of a Candle Inform the Teaching of Experimentation?. Science & Education 29:3, pages 589-616.
Crossref
Roxana Jara, Cristian Merino, Marcela Arellano, Gisselle Inzunza, Miriam Satlov & Agustín Adúriz-Bravo. 2020. Education and Technology in Sciences. Education and Technology in Sciences
128
140
.
Lars Brehm, Marion Rauscher & Andreas Humpe. 2020. Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality. Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality
297
309
.
Sérgio Ferreira, Roberta Corrêa & Fernando César Silva. (2019) Estudo dos roteiros de experimentos disponibilizados em repositórios virtuais por meio do ensino por investigação. Ciência & Educação (Bauru) 25:4, pages 999-1017.
Crossref
Marcos A.S. Ribeiro, Angélica P.P. Tonin, Camila B. Poliseli, Beatriz B. Lima, Luiz E.N. Castro, Valquíria M. Silva, Marcelo Valério, Jaime C. Cedran & Eduardo C. Meurer. (2019) Teaching venturi electrospray mass spectrometry with amino acid analysis. International Journal of Mass Spectrometry 444, pages 116183.
Crossref
İşıl AYKUTLU, Sevim BEZEN & Celal BAYRAK. (2019) An Examination of Pre-Service Teachers’ Metaphorical Perceptions Concerning Physics Lab ApplicationsÖğretmen Adaylarının Fizik Laboratuvar Uygulamasına İlişkin Metaforik Algılarının İncelenmesi. Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 8:1, pages 32-53.
Crossref
P R Scomparin & J T Carvalho-Neto. (2018) A simple and effective magnetic dynamometer to teach Newton’s third law. Physics Education 53:6, pages 065002.
Crossref
Antonio García-Carmona & José Antonio Acevedo-Díaz. (2018) The Nature of Scientific Practice and Science Education. Science & Education 27:5-6, pages 435-455.
Crossref
Tamara J. Moore, S. Selcen Guzey, Gillian H. Roehrig & Richard A. Lesh. 2018. Towards a Framework for Representational Competence in Science Education. Towards a Framework for Representational Competence in Science Education
13
30
.
Jan Andersson & Margareta Enghag. (2017) THE LABORATORY WORK STYLE’S INFLUENCE ON STUDENTS’ COMMUNICATION. Journal of Baltic Science Education 16:6, pages 958-979.
Crossref
Chui Im Choi & Sun-Kung Lee. (2016) Reconsidering the Meanings of Experiments and Instruments Based on the Analysis of Chemistry Experiments in Textbooks. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society 60:4, pages 267-275.
Crossref
Celeste R. Gomes, Armando F. Rocha, Joaquim A. Ferreira & Ana Rola. 2016. Geoscience Education. Geoscience Education
73
84
.
Roland M. Schulz. 2014. International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching. International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching
1259
1316
.
Derek Hodson. 2014. International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching. International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching
911
970
.
Laurinda Leite & Luís Dourado. (2013) Laboratory Activities, Science Education and Problem-solving Skills. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 106, pages 1677-1686.
Crossref
Jennifer L. Eastwood, Troy D. Sadler, Robert D. Sherwood & Whitney M. Schlegel. (2012) Students’ Participation in an Interdisciplinary, Socioscientific Issues Based Undergraduate Human Biology Major and Their Understanding of Scientific Inquiry. Research in Science Education 43:3, pages 1051-1078.
Crossref
Haydée Santilli. (2010) Science and Technology, Autonomous and More Interdependent Every Time. Science & Education 21:6, pages 797-811.
Crossref
Giuliana Maria Gabancho Barrenechea Bueno, Sidilene Aquino de Farias & Luiz Henrique Ferreira. (2012) Concepções de ensino de ciências no início do Século XX: o olhar do educador alemão Georg Kerschensteiner. Ciência & Educação (Bauru) 18:2, pages 435-450.
Crossref
Barry J. Fraser. 2012. Second International Handbook of Science Education. Second International Handbook of Science Education
1191
1239
.
Per Högström, Christina Ottander & Sylvia Benckert. (2009) Lab Work and Learning in Secondary School Chemistry: The Importance of Teacher and Student Interaction. Research in Science Education 40:4, pages 505-523.
Crossref
Sahide Maral, Ayse Oguz-Unver & Kemal Yurumezoglu. (2010) The tendencies and difficulties experienced by pre-service science teachers during basic measuring. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 2:2, pages 2189-2193.
Crossref
Marisa Correia & Ana Freire. (2009) TRABALHO LABORATORIAL E PRÁTICAS DE AVALIAÇÃO DE PROFESSORES DE CIÊNCIAS FÍSICO-QUÍMICAS DO ENSINO BÁSICO. Ensaio Pesquisa em Educação em Ciências (Belo Horizonte) 11:1, pages 160-191.
Crossref
Laura April McEwendik HarrisRichard F. Schmid, Jackie Vogel, Tamara Western & Paul Harrison. (2009) Evaluation of the Redesign of an Undergraduate Cell Biology Course. CBE—Life Sciences Education 8:1, pages 72-78.
Crossref
Siu Ling Wong & Derek Hodson. (2008) From the horse's mouth: What scientists say about scientific investigation and scientific knowledge. Science Education 93:1, pages 109-130.
Crossref
Mary B. Nakhleh, John Polles & Eric Malina. 2003. Chemical Education: Towards Research-based Practice. Chemical Education: Towards Research-based Practice
69
94
.
Karen Sullenger & Steve Turner. 2002. The Nature of Science in Science Education. The Nature of Science in Science Education
243
253
.
Barry J. Fraser. 1998. International Handbook of Science Education. International Handbook of Science Education
527
561
.
John Wilkinson & Malcolm Ward. (1997) A comparative study of students' and their teacher's perceptions of laboratory work in secondary schools. Research in Science Education 27:4, pages 599-610.
Crossref
Marthie A. M. Meester & Paul A. Kirschner. (1995) Practical work at the Open University of the Netherlands. Journal of Science Education and Technology 4:2, pages 127-140.
Crossref
Barry J. Fraser, Geoffrey J. Giddings & Campbell J. McRobbie. (2006) Evolution and validation of a personal form of an instrument for assessing science laboratory classroom environments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 32:4, pages 399-422.
Crossref
Wayne Schulz & Campbell McRobbie. (1994) A constructivist approach to secondary school science experiments. Research in Science Education 24:1, pages 295-303.
Crossref
P G J T Parkhouse. (1994) Emphasizing theory in science education. Physics Education 29:4, pages 204-208.
Crossref
Kok‐Aun Toh & Brian E. Woolnough. (2006) Middle school students' achievement in laboratory investigations: Explicit versus tacit knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 30:5, pages 445-457.
Crossref
Derek Hodson. (1993) Philosophic stance of secondary school science teachers, curriculum experiences, and children's understanding of science: Some preliminary findings. Interchange 24:1-2, pages 41-52.
Crossref
Barry J. Fraser, Geoffrey J. Giddings & Campbell J. McRobbie. (1992) Assessment of the psychosocial environment of university science laboratory classrooms: a cross-national study. Higher Education 24:4, pages 431-451.
Crossref
Derek Hodson. (1992) Assessment of practical work. Science and Education 1:2, pages 115-144.
Crossref
Michael R. Matthews. (1992) History, philosophy, and science teaching: The present rapprochement. Science and Education 1:1, pages 11-47.
Crossref
Yoshisuke Kumano. (2016) Why Does Japan Need STS …. a Comparative Study of Secondary Science Education between Japan and the U.S. Focussing on an STS Approach. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 11:6, pages 322-330.
Crossref
Andrew T. Lumpe & Lawrence C. Scharmann. (1991) Meeting Contemporary Goals for Lab Instruction: A Content Analysis of Two Secondary Biology Textbooks. School Science and Mathematics 91:6, pages 231-235.
Crossref
. (1991) Dimensions of Hands-on Science. The American Biology Teacher 53:6, pages 345-348.
Crossref
Liam F. Heaney. (1990) APU Science Tests: Concept Acquisition. International Journal of Educational Management 4:3.
Crossref