Citations (8)
Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.
Read on this site (5)
David Tuckett, Jacqueline Amati Mehler, Sara Collins, Michael Diercks, Denis Flynn, Claudia Frank, David Millar, Elisabeth Skale & Marie-Ange Wagtmann. (2020) Psychoanalytic training in the Eitingon model and its controversies: A way forward. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis 101:6, pages 1106-1135.
Read now
Read now
Sabrina Cherry, Gregory Mann & Ruth Graver. (2020) Becoming a Training and Supervising Analyst: Interviews from the Columbia Postgraduate Analytic Practice Study. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis 101:2, pages 300-319.
Read now
Read now
C. Edward Watkins$suffix/text()$suffix/text(). (2016) Psychoanalytic supervision in the new millennium: On pressing needs and impressing possibilities. International Forum of Psychoanalysis 25:1, pages 50-67.
Read now
Read now
Gábor Szőnyi. (2014) The Vicissitudes of the Budapest Model of Supervision: Can We Learn From It Today?. Psychoanalytic Inquiry 34:6, pages 606-618.
Read now
Read now
Didier Houzel. (2012) Infant observation and the French model. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis 93:1, pages 181-201.
Read now
Read now
Articles from other publishers (3)
Werner Bohleber. (2019) Zur Geschichte des Eitingon-Modells und seiner Bedeutung für die psychoanalytische Ausbildung. PSYCHE 73:07, pages 477-496.
Crossref
Crossref
C. Edward WatkinsJr.Jr.. (2014) On Psychoanalytic Supervision as Signature Pedagogy. The Psychoanalytic Review 101:2, pages 175-195.
Crossref
Crossref
Nancy J. Chodorow. (2010) Beyond the Dyad: Individual Psychology, Social World. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 58:2, pages 207-230.
Crossref
Crossref