Advanced search
Publication Cover
Current Medical Research and Opinion Volume 27, 2011 - Issue 3
Submit an article Journal homepage
330
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research letter

Compatibility testing of two types of pen needles with a range of injection pens for diabetes medication

Peter Buus Novo Nordisk A/S, Hillerød, DenmarkCorrespondence[email protected]
,
Søren Kruse Lilleøre Novo Nordisk A/S, Virum, Denmark
&
Kirsten Larsen Novo Nordisk A/S, Hillerød, Denmark
Pages 589-592 | Accepted 09 Dec 2010, Published online: 12 Jan 2011

Citations (5)

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Subscribe to citation updates

Read on this site (5)

Antonio Nicolucci & Luca Leonardi. (2022) Compatibility of PiC Insupen Needles with a Broad Range of Pens for the Injection of Subcutaneously Administered Drugs for Diabetes. Medical Devices: Evidence and Research 15, pages 71-77.
Read now
Gerhard Klausmann, Irene Hramiak, Marianne Qvist, Kristian Handberg Mikkelsen & Xiaohui Guo. (2013) Evaluation of preference for a novel durable insulin pen with memory function among patients with diabetes and health care professionals. Patient Preference and Adherence 7, pages 285-292.
Read now
Xiaohui Guo, Bärbel Sommavilla, Grace Vanterpool, Marianne Qvist, Matthias Bethien & Søren Kruse Lilleøre. (2012) Evaluation of a new durable insulin pen with memory function among people with diabetes and healthcare professionals. Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery 9:4, pages 355-366.
Read now
David Oyer, Parth Narendran, Marianne Qvist, Marcus Niemeyer & Daniel A Nadeau. (2011) Ease of use and preference of a new versus widely available prefilled insulin pen assessed by people with diabetes, physicians and nurses. Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery 8:10, pages 1259-1269.
Read now
T. Bailey, J. Thurman, M. Niemeyer & G. Schmeisl. (2011) Usability and preference evaluation of a prefilled insulin pen with a novel injection mechanism by people with diabetes and healthcare professionals. Current Medical Research and Opinion 27:10, pages 2043-2052.
Read now

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.