413
Views
39
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Effects of Response Sets on NEO-PI-R Scores and Their Relations to External Criteria

Pages 472-488 | Published online: 10 Jun 2010

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (7)

Paul Detrick, JohnT. Chibnall & Cynthia Call. (2010) Demand Effects on Positive Response Distortion by Police Officer Applicants on the Revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment 92:5, pages 410-415.
Read now
BenjaminJ. Morasco, JeffreyD. Gfeller & KatherineA. Elder. (2007) The Utility of the NEO–PI–R Validity Scales to Detect Response Distortion: A Comparison With the MMPI–2. Journal of Personality Assessment 88:3, pages 276-283.
Read now
Uwe Peter Kanning & Susanne Kuhne. (2006) Social desirability in a multimodal personnel selection test battery. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 15:3, pages 241-261.
Read now
Frank Langer. (2004) Pairs, Reflections, and the EgoI: Exploration of a Perceptual Hypothesis. Journal of Personality Assessment 82:1, pages 114-126.
Read now
Leslie C. Morey, Brian D. Quigley, Charles A. Sanislow, Andrew E. Skodol, Thomas H. McGlashan, M. Tracie Shea, Robert L. Stout, Mary C. Zanarini & John G. Gunderson. (2002) Substance or Style? An Investigation of the NEO-PI-R Validity Scales. Journal of Personality Assessment 79:3, pages 583-599.
Read now
David T. R. Berry, R. Michael Bagby, Jessica Smerz, Jason C. Rinaldo, Alison Caldwell-Andrews & Ruth A. Baer. (2001) Effectiveness of NEO-PI-R Research Validity Scales for Discriminating Analog Malingering and Genuine Psychopathology. Journal of Personality Assessment 76:3, pages 496-516.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (32)

Friedemann StrackeFriedemann Stracke. 2023. Menschen verstehen – Potenziale erkennen. Menschen verstehen – Potenziale erkennen 175 196 .
David M. Corey & Paul Detrick. 2022. Comprehensive Clinical Psychology. Comprehensive Clinical Psychology 258 284 .
Marc Dupuis, Emanuele Meier & Félix Cuneo. (2018) Detecting computer-generated random responding in questionnaire-based data: A comparison of seven indices. Behavior Research Methods 51:5, pages 2228-2237.
Crossref
Goran Pavlov, Alberto Maydeu-Olivares & Amanda J. Fairchild. (2018) Effects of Applicant Faking on Forced-Choice and Likert Scores. Organizational Research Methods 22:3, pages 710-739.
Crossref
Paul Detrick & John T. Chibnall. 2019. Human Performance Technology. Human Performance Technology 1476 1489 .
Roger L Greene & Irving B Weiner. 2017. Handbook of Personality Assessment, Second Edition. Handbook of Personality Assessment, Second Edition 287 308 .
Paul Detrick & John T. Chibnall. 2017. Police Psychology and Its Growing Impact on Modern Law Enforcement. Police Psychology and Its Growing Impact on Modern Law Enforcement 79 92 .
Marcus Roth & Philipp Yorck Herzberg. (2017) The Resilient Personality Prototype. Journal of Individual Differences 38:1, pages 1-11.
Crossref
Jesús F. Salgado. (2016) A Theoretical Model of Psychometric Effects of Faking on Assessment Procedures: Empirical findings and implications for personality at work. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 24:3, pages 209-228.
Crossref
Marc Dupuis, Emanuele Meier, Roland Capel & Francis Gendre. (2015) Measuring individuals' response quality in self-administered psychological tests: an introduction to Gendre's functional method. Frontiers in Psychology 6.
Crossref
Jacques Juhel, Sophie Brunot & Gérard Zapata. (2012) Response Distortion on the NEO PI-R among Candidates Taking the Entrance Examination to the National School of Civil Aviation (ENAC-France). Psychology 03:05, pages 393-398.
Crossref
Danielle L. Burchett & Yossef S. Ben-Porath. (2010) The Impact of Overreporting on MMPI-2-RF Substantive Scale Score Validity. Assessment 17:4, pages 497-516.
Crossref
Jeremias J. de Klerk, Adré B. Boshoff & René van Wyk. (2009) Measuring Meaning in Life in South Africa: Validation of an Instrument Developed in the USA. South African Journal of Psychology 39:3, pages 314-325.
Crossref
Barbara Krahé, Jana Becker & Jana Zöllter. (2020) Contextual cues as a source of response bias in personality questionnaires: The case of the NEO‐FFI. European Journal of Personality 22:8, pages 655-673.
Crossref
Martin SellbomR. Michael Bagby. (2008) The Validity and Utility of the Positive Presentation Management and Negative Presentation Management Scales for the Revised NEO Personality Inventory. Assessment 15:2, pages 165-176.
Crossref
Nathan R. Kuncel & Matthew J. Borneman. (2007) Toward a New Method of Detecting Deliberately Faked Personality Tests: The use of idiosyncratic item responses. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 15:2, pages 220-231.
Crossref
Morris Bell, Joanna Fiszdon, Randall Richardson, Paul Lysaker & Gary Bryson. (2007) Are self-reports valid for schizophrenia patients with poor insight? Relationship of unawareness of illness to psychological self-report instruments. Psychiatry Research 151:1-2, pages 37-46.
Crossref
Glenn D. Walters. (2016) Effect of Test Administration Set on the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles (PICTS). International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 50:6, pages 661-671.
Crossref
Kenn Konstabel, Toivo Aavik & Jüri Allik. (2020) Social desirability and consensual validity of personality traits. European Journal of Personality 20:7, pages 549-566.
Crossref
Filip De Fruyt, Anton Aluja, Luis F. Garcia, Jean-Pierre Rolland & Sung Cheol Jung. (2006) Positive Presentation Management and Intelligence and the Personality Differentiation by Intelligence Hypothesis in Job Applicants. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 14:2, pages 101-112.
Crossref
Carol L. Wagner, Mark T. Wagner, Myla Ebeling, Katreia Gleaton Chatman, Millicent Cohen & Thomas C. Hulsey. (2016) The Role of Personality and Other Factors in a Mother’s Decision to Initiate Breastfeeding. Journal of Human Lactation 22:1, pages 16-26.
Crossref
Margarita B. Marshall, Filip De Fruyt, Jean-Pierre Rolland & R. Michael Bagby. (2005) Socially desirable responding and the factorial stability of the NEO PI-R.. Psychological Assessment 17:3, pages 379-384.
Crossref
Cornelia A. Pauls & Nicolas W. Crost. (2005) Cognitive Ability and Self-Reported Efficacy of Self-Presentation Predict Faking on Personality Measures. Journal of Individual Differences 26:4, pages 194-206.
Crossref
Thomas M. Achenbach, Rebecca A. Krukowski, Levent Dumenci & Masha Y. Ivanova. (2005) Assessment of Adult Psychopathology: Meta-Analyses and Implications of Cross-Informant Correlations.. Psychological Bulletin 131:3, pages 361-382.
Crossref
R. Michael Bagby & Margarita B. Marshall. (2016) Assessing Underreporting Response Bias on the MMPI-2. Assessment 11:2, pages 115-126.
Crossref
Barbara Griffin, Beryl Hesketh & David Grayson. (2004) Applicants faking good: evidence of item bias in the NEO PI-R. Personality and Individual Differences 36:7, pages 1545-1558.
Crossref
Philipp Yorck Herzberg. (2004) Lässt sich der Einfluss sozialer Erwünschtheit in einem Fragebogen zur Erfassung aggressiver Verhaltensweisen im Straßenverkehr korrigieren?. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie 25:1, pages 19-29.
Crossref
Bruce A. Arrigo & Natalie Claussen. (2016) Police Corruption and Psychological Testing: A Strategy for Preemployment Screening. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 47:3, pages 272-290.
Crossref
R. Michael Bagby & Margarita B. Marshall. (2003) Positive Impression Management and Its Influence on the Revised NEO Personality Inventory: A Comparison of Analog and Differential Prevalence Group Designs.. Psychological Assessment 15:3, pages 333-339.
Crossref
James F. Ballenger, Alison Caldwell-Andrews & Ruth A. Baer. (2001) Effects of positive impression management on the NEO Personality Inventory–Revised in a clinical population.. Psychological Assessment 13:2, pages 254-260.
Crossref
Gregory J. Meyer, Stephen E. Finn, Lorraine D. Eyde, Gary G. Kay, Kevin L. Moreland, Robert R. Dies, Elena J. Eisman, Tom W. Kubiszyn & Geoffrey M. Reed. (2001) Psychological testing and psychological assessment: A review of evidence and issues.. American Psychologist 56:2, pages 128-165.
Crossref
Jian Yang, R. Michael Bagby & Andrew G. Ryder. (2016) Response Style and the Revised NEO Personality Inventory: Validity Scales and Spousal Ratings in a Chinese Psychiatric Sample. Assessment 7:4, pages 389-402.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.