198
Views
44
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

On the Science of Rorschach Research

Pages 46-81 | Published online: 10 Jun 2010

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (19)

Bent Rosenbaum, Palle Bent Andersen, Per Bjerregaard Knudsen & Pia Lorentzen. (2012) Rorschach Inkblot Method data at baseline and after 2 years treatment of consecutively admitted patients with first-episode schizophrenia. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry 66:2, pages 79-85.
Read now
Lily Rothschild, Liza Lacoua, Yohanan Eshel & Daniel Stein. (2008) Changes in Defensiveness and in Affective Distress Following Inpatient Treatment of Eating Disorders: Rorschach Comprehensive System and Self-Report Measures. Journal of Personality Assessment 90:4, pages 356-367.
Read now
TamK. Dao, Frances Prevatt & Heather Leveta Horne. (2008) Differentiating Psychotic Patients From Nonpsychotic Patients With the MMPI–2 and Rorschach. Journal of Personality Assessment 90:1, pages 93-101.
Read now
JamesN. Bow, JonathanW. Gould, JamesR. Flens & Dana Greenhut. (2006) Testing in Child Custody Evaluations–Selection, Usage, and Daubert Admissibility: A Survey of Psychologists. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice 6:2, pages 17-38.
Read now
JanetR. Johnston, MarjorieG. Walters & NancyW. Olesen. (2005) Clinical Ratings of Parenting Capacity and Rorschach Protocols of Custody-Disputing Parents: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Child Custody 2:1-2, pages 159-178.
Read now
RobertE. Erard. (2005) What the Rorschach Can Contribute to Child Custody and Parenting Time Evaluations. Journal of Child Custody 2:1-2, pages 119-142.
Read now
Cato Gronnerod. (2004) Rorschach Assessment of Changes Following Psychotherapy: A Meta-Analytic Review. Journal of Personality Assessment 83:3, pages 256-276.
Read now
Mark J. Hilsenroth & George Stricker. (2004) A Consideration of Challenges to Psychological Assessment Instruments Used in Forensic Settings: Rorschach As Exemplar. Journal of Personality Assessment 83:2, pages 141-152.
Read now
Ellen Hartmann, Catharina E. Wang, Marit Berg & Line Sæther. (2003) Depression and Vulnerability As Assessed by the Rorschach Method. Journal of Personality Assessment 81:3, pages 242-255.
Read now
Cato Gronnerod. (2003) Temporal Stability in the Rorschach Method : A Meta-Analytic Review. Journal of Personality Assessment 80:3, pages 272-293.
Read now
Ellen Hartmann, Tor Sunde, Wenche Kristensen & Monica Martinussen. (2003) Psychological Measures As Predictors of Military Training Performance. Journal of Personality Assessment 80:1, pages 87-98.
Read now
Joseph Masling. (2002) How Do I Score Thee? Let Me Count the Ways. Or Some Different Methods of Categorizing Rorschach Responses. Journal of Personality Assessment 79:3, pages 399-421.
Read now
Gregory J. Meyer. (2002) Exploring Possible Ethnic Differences and Bias in the Rorschach Comprehensive System. Journal of Personality Assessment 78:1, pages 104-129.
Read now
CarlB. Gacono, F. Barton Evans$suffix/text()$suffix/text() & DonaldJ. Viglione. (2002) The Rorschach in Forensic Practice. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice 2:3, pages 33-53.
Read now
CarlB. Gacono, JamesL. Loving, F. Barton Evans$suffix/text()$suffix/text() & MichaelT. Jumes. (2002) The Psychopathy Checklist-Revised: PCL-R Testimony and Forensic Practice. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice 2:3, pages 11-32.
Read now
CarlB. Gacono. (2002) Introduction to a Special Series: Forensic Psychodiagnostic Testing. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice 2:3, pages 1-10.
Read now
CarlB. Gacono & RobertH. Bodholdt. (2001) The Role of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R) in Violence Risk and Threat Assessment. Journal of Threat Assessment 1:4, pages 67-81.
Read now
James M. Wood, M. Teresa Nezworski, William J. Stejskal & Sena Garven. (2001) Advancing Scientific Discourse in the Controversy Surrounding the Comprehensive System for the Rorschach: A Rejoinder to Meyer (2000). Journal of Personality Assessment 76:3, pages 369-378.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (25)

Joni L. Mihura, Callie E. Jowers, Nicolae Dumitrascu, Alicia W. Villanueva van den Hurk & Philip J. Keddy. (2022) The Specific Uses of the Rorschach in Clinical Practice. Rorschachiana 43:1, pages 25-41.
Crossref
Jason M. Smith, Carl B. Gacono & Ted B. Cunliffe. 2021. Understanding Female Offenders. Understanding Female Offenders 113 239 .
Carl B. Gacono & Jason M. Smith. 2021. Understanding Female Offenders. Understanding Female Offenders 241 298 .
Joshua J. Eblin, Gregory J. Meyer, Joni L. Mihura, Donald J. Viglione & Emily T. O'Gorman. (2018) Development and preliminary validation of a brief behavioral measure of psychotic propensity. Psychiatry Research 268, pages 340-347.
Crossref
김정안 & 최성진. (2016) Diagnostic efficiency and differential ability of MMPI-2 and Rorschach: Focus on Schizophrenia-Spectrum Disorder. Korean Journal of Health Psychology 21:2, pages 411-430.
Crossref
Shira Tibon-Czopp & Irving B. WeinerShira Tibon-Czopp & Irving B. Weiner. 2016. Rorschach Assessment of Adolescents. Rorschach Assessment of Adolescents 65 95 .
J. Englebert, E. Thiltges, C. Wertz & A. Blavier. (2013) Les contenus anatomiques au test de Rorschach : comparaison des réponses de sujets infirmiers à une population contrôle. L'Encéphale 39:2, pages 94-100.
Crossref
Jack A. Naglieri & John R. Graham. 2012. Handbook of Psychology, Second Edition. Handbook of Psychology, Second Edition.
Joni L. Mihura. (2012) The Necessity of Multiple Test Methods in Conducting Assessments: The Role of the Rorschach and Self-Report. Psychological Injury and Law 5:2, pages 97-106.
Crossref
Steven R. Smith. (2007) Performance-Based Assessment in Schools. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment 25:3, pages 248-256.
Crossref
David N. Miller & Amanda B. Nickerson. (2014) Projective Assessment and School Psychology: Contemporary Validity Issues and Implications for Practice. The California School Psychologist 11:1, pages 73-84.
Crossref
Drew Westen & Joel Weinberger. (2005) Clinical Judgment in Science: Reply.. American Psychologist 60:6, pages 659-661.
Crossref
Damien Fouques. (2004) Evaluation des psychothérapies : l'apport du Rorschach (S.I.). Psychologie Française 49:1, pages 25-32.
Crossref
Carl-Erik Mattlar. (2004) Are We Entitled to Use Rorschach Workshop's Norms When Interpreting the Comprehensive System in Finland?. Rorschachiana 26:1, pages 85-109.
Crossref
Carl-Erik Mattlar. (2004) The Rorschach Comprehensive System is Reliable, Valid, and Cost-Effective. Rorschachiana 26:1, pages 158-186.
Crossref
Marianne Nygren. (2004) Differences in Comprehensive System Rorschach Variables Between Groups Differing in Therapy Suitability. Rorschachiana 26:1, pages 110-146.
Crossref
Howard N. Garb. (2003) Incremental Validity and the Assessment of Psychopathology in Adults.. Psychological Assessment 15:4, pages 508-520.
Crossref
Jack A. Naglieri & John R. Graham. 2003. Handbook of Psychology. Handbook of Psychology.
Donald J. Viglione & Bridget Rivera. 2003. Handbook of Psychology. Handbook of Psychology.
Michael T. Jumes, Peter P. Oropeza, B. Thomas Gray & Carl B. Gacono. (2016) Use of the Rorschach in Forensic Settings for Treatment Planning and Monitoring. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 46:3, pages 294-307.
Crossref
Carl B. Gacono. (2016) Guest Editorial: Why There Is a Need for the Personality Assessment of Offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 46:3, pages 271-273.
Crossref
Barry Ritzler, Robert Erard & Gary Pettigrew. (2002) A final reply to Grove and Barden: The relevance of the Rorschach Comprehensive System for expert testimony.. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 8:2, pages 235-246.
Crossref
William M. Grove, R. Christopher Barden, Howard N. Garb & Scott O. Lilienfeld. (2002) Failure of Rorschach-Comprehensive-System-based testimony to be admissible under the Daubert-Joiner-Kumho standard.. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 8:2, pages 216-234.
Crossref
Barry Ritzler, Robert Erard & Gary Pettigrew. (2002) Protecting the integrity of Rorschach expert witnesses: A reply to Grove and Barden (1999) re: The admissibility of testimony under Daubert/Kumho analyses.. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 8:2, pages 201-215.
Crossref
Scott O. Lilienfeld, James M. Wood & Howard N. Garb. (2017) The Scientific Status of Projective Techniques. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 1:2, pages 27-66.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.