Citations (119)
Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.
Read on this site (13)
Nathaniel M. Voss, Cassandra Chlevin-Thiele, Christopher J. Lake & Chi-Leigh Warren. (2023) Using item response theory to understand the effects of scale contextualization: An illustration using decision making style scales. International Journal of Testing 23:1, pages 34-55.
Read now
Read now
Alexander Obbarius, Johannes C. Ehrenthal, Felix Fischer, Gregor Liegl, Nina Obbarius, Lea Sarrar & Matthias Rose. (2021) Applying Item Response Theory to the OPD Structure Questionnaire: Identification of a Unidimensional Core Construct and Feasibility of Computer Adaptive Testing. Journal of Personality Assessment 103:5, pages 645-658.
Read now
Read now
Helena Garrido-Hernansaiz, Manuel Martín-Fernández, Aida Castaño-Torrijos & Isabel Cuevas. (2018) Development and Validation of the ADAS Scale and Prediction of Attitudes Toward Affective-Sexual Diversity Among Spanish Secondary Students. Journal of Homosexuality 65:8, pages 1032-1050.
Read now
Read now
Mengyang Cao, Q. Chelsea Song & Louis Tay. (2018) Detecting Curvilinear Relationships: A Comparison of Scoring Approaches Based on Different Item Response Models. International Journal of Testing 18:2, pages 178-205.
Read now
Read now
Aja Louise Murray, Tom Booth & Dylan Molenaar. (2016) When Middle Really Means “Top” or “Bottom”: An Analysis of the 16PF5 Using Bock's Nominal Response Model. Journal of Personality Assessment 98:3, pages 319-331.
Read now
Read now
Christos D. Melas, Leonidas A. Zampetakis, Anastasia Dimopoulou & Vassilis S. Moustakis. (2014) The significance of attitudes towards evidence-based practice in information technology use in the health sector: an empirical investigation. Behaviour & Information Technology 33:12, pages 1248-1260.
Read now
Read now
Alberto Maydeu-Olivares. (2013) Why Should We Assess the Goodness-of-Fit of IRT Models?. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives 11:3, pages 127-137.
Read now
Read now
WilcoH. M. Emons, Floortje Mols, Aline Pelle, KimG. Smolderen & Johan Denollet. (2012) Type D Assessment in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure and Peripheral Arterial Disease: Evaluation of the Experimental DS(3) Scale Using Item Response Theory. Journal of Personality Assessment 94:2, pages 210-219.
Read now
Read now
Alberto Maydeu-Olivares, Li Cai & Adolfo Hernández. (2011) Comparing the Fit of Item Response Theory and Factor Analysis Models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 18:3, pages 333-356.
Read now
Read now
RobR. Meijer, IrisJ. L. Egberink, WilcoH. M. Emons & Klaas Sijtsma. (2008) Detection and Validation of Unscalable Item Score Patterns Using Item Response Theory: An Illustration with Harter's Self-Perception Profile for Children. Journal of Personality Assessment 90:3, pages 227-238.
Read now
Read now
Albert Maydeu-Olivares, Adolfo Hernández & Roderick P. McDonald. (2006) A Multidimensional Ideal Point Item Response Theory Model for Binary Data. Multivariate Behavioral Research 41:4, pages 445-472.
Read now
Read now
Albert Maydeu-Olivares. (2005) Further Empirical Results on Parametric Versus Non-Parametric IRT Modeling of Likert-Type Personality Data. Multivariate Behavioral Research 40:2, pages 261-279.
Read now
Read now
Steven P. Reise & James M. Henson. (2003) A Discussion of Modern Versus Traditional Psychometrics As Applied to Personality Assessment Scales. Journal of Personality Assessment 81:2, pages 93-103.
Read now
Read now
Articles from other publishers (106)
Leonardo Carlucci, Marco Innamorati, Melissa Ree, Giorgia D’Ignazio & Michela Balsamo. (2023) Measuring State and Trait Anxiety: An Application of Multidimensional Item Response Theory. Behavioral Sciences 13:8, pages 628.
Crossref
Crossref
Yuting Han, Jihong Zhang, Zhehan Jiang & Dexin Shi. (2022) Is the Area Under Curve Appropriate for Evaluating the Fit of Psychometric Models?. Educational and Psychological Measurement 83:3, pages 586-608.
Crossref
Crossref
Joel Gomes da Silva, Jonhatan Magno Norte da Silva, Lucas Gomes Miranda Bispo, Deividson Sá Fernandes de Souza, Rômulo Silva Serafim, Manoel Gerônimo Lino Torres, Wilza Karla dos Santos Leite & Elamara Marama de Araujo Vieira. (2023) Construction of a Musculoskeletal Discomfort Scale for the Lower Limbs of Workers: An Analysis Using the Multigroup Item Response Theory. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 20:7, pages 5307.
Crossref
Crossref
Juan LIU, Chanjin ZHENG, Yunchuan LI & Xu LIAN. (2022) IRT-based scoring methods for multidimensional forced choice tests. Advances in Psychological Science 30:6, pages 1410-1428.
Crossref
Crossref
Philseok Lee, Seang-Hwane Joo, Steven Zhou & Mina Son. (2022) Investigating the impact of negatively keyed statements on multidimensional forced-choice personality measures: A comparison of partially ipsative and IRT scoring methods. Personality and Individual Differences 191, pages 111555.
Crossref
Crossref
Changki Jang & WookJoon Sung. (2021) Beyond the privacy paradox: The moderating effect of online privacy concerns on online service use behavior. Telematics and Informatics 65, pages 101715.
Crossref
Crossref
Jason L. Huang & Justin A. DeSimone. (2020) Insufficient Effort Responding as a Potential Confound between Survey Measures and Objective Tests. Journal of Business and Psychology 36:5, pages 807-828.
Crossref
Crossref
Eren Halil ÖZBERK, Elif Bengi ÜNSAL ÖZBERK, Sait ULUÇ & Ferhunde ÖKTEM. (2021) Investigating Invariant Item Ordering in Intelligence Tests: Mokken Scale Analysis of KBIT-2Investigating Invariant Item Ordering in Intelligence Tests: Mokken Scale Analysis of KBIT-2. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education 8:3, pages 714-728.
Crossref
Crossref
Sibel Telli, Ridwan Maulana & Michelle Helms-Lorenz. (2020) Students’ perceptions of teaching behaviour in Turkish secondary education: a Mokken Scaling of My Teacher Questionnaire. Learning Environments Research 24:2, pages 315-337.
Crossref
Crossref
Esra SÖZER & Nilüfer KAHRAMAN. (2021) Investigation of Psychometric Properties of Likert Items with Same Categories Using Polytomous Item Response Theory Models. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi 12:2, pages 129-146.
Crossref
Crossref
Seval KARTAL & Ezgi MOR DİRLİK. (2021) Examining the Dimensionality and Monotonicity of an Attitude Dataset based on the Item Response Theory ModelsExamining the Dimensionality and Monotonicity of an Attitude Dataset based on the Item Response Theory Models. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education 8:2, pages 296-309.
Crossref
Crossref
Gezahegn Alemayehu, Gezahegne Mamo, Hiwot Desta, Biruk Alemu & Barbara Wieland. (2021) Knowledge, attitude, and practices to zoonotic disease risks from livestock birth products among smallholder communities in Ethiopia. One Health 12, pages 100223.
Crossref
Crossref
Patrícia Silva Lúcio, Joachim Vandekerckhove, Guilherme V. Polanczyk & Hugo Cogo-Moreira. (2020) Is It Worthy to Take Account of the “Guessing” in the Performance of the Raven Test? Calling for the Principle of Parsimony for Test Validation. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment 39:1, pages 100-111.
Crossref
Crossref
Sadaf Ashtari & Al Bellamy. 2021. Research Anthology on Nursing Education and Overcoming Challenges in the Workplace. Research Anthology on Nursing Education and Overcoming Challenges in the Workplace
199
223
.
Stefanie A. Wind. (2020) Exploring the Impact of Rater Effects on Person Fit in Rater‐Mediated Assessments. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 39:4, pages 76-94.
Crossref
Crossref
Clemente Rodríguez-Sabiote, José Álvarez-Rodríguez, Daniel Álvarez-Ferrandiz & Felix Zurita-Ortega. (2020) Development of Nomophobia Profiles in Education Students through the Use of Multiple Correspondence Analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17:21, pages 8252.
Crossref
Crossref
Thanise Sabrina Souza Santos, Dalton Francisco de Andrade, Antonio Cezar Bornia, Wolney Lisboa Conde & Betzabeth Slater Villar. (2020) Escala de violência intrafamiliar e escolar usando a Teoria de Resposta ao Item. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva 25:11, pages 4473-4484.
Crossref
Crossref
Jonhatan Magno Norte da Silva, Leila Amaral Gontijo, Antonio Cezar Bornia, Luiz Bueno da Silva, Wilza Karla dos Santos Leite, Elamara Marama de Araujo Vieira & Manoel Gerônimo Lino Torres. (2020) Construction of an osteomuscular discomfort scale for the upper region of the body of footwear industry workers. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 80, pages 103048.
Crossref
Crossref
Christopher D. Nye, Seang-Hwane Joo, Bo Zhang & Stephen Stark. (2019) Advancing and Evaluating IRT Model Data Fit Indices in Organizational Research. Organizational Research Methods 23:3, pages 457-486.
Crossref
Crossref
Gwendolyn M. Lawson, Tyler M. Moore, Kelsie H. Okamura, Emily M. Becker-Haimes & Rinad S. Beidas. (2020) Knowledge of Evidence-Based Services Questionnaire: Development and Validation of a Short Form. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research 47:4, pages 581-596.
Crossref
Crossref
Bo Zhang, Mengyang Cao, Louis Tay, Jing Luo & Fritz Drasgow. (2019) Examining the item response process to personality measures in high‐stakes situations: Issues of measurement validity and predictive validity. Personnel Psychology 73:2, pages 305-332.
Crossref
Crossref
Seang-Hwane Joo, Philseok Lee & Stephen Stark. (2019) Adaptive testing with the GGUM-RANK multidimensional forced choice model: Comparison of pair, triplet, and tetrad scoring. Behavior Research Methods 52:2, pages 761-772.
Crossref
Crossref
Biruk Alemu Gemeda, Kebede Amenu, Ulf Magnusson, Ian Dohoo, Gunilla Ström Hallenberg, Gezahegn Alemayehu, Hiwot Desta & Barbara Wieland. (2020) Antimicrobial Use in Extensive Smallholder Livestock Farming Systems in Ethiopia: Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Livestock Keepers. Frontiers in Veterinary Science 7.
Crossref
Crossref
Marle dos Santos Alvarenga, Thanise Sabrina Souza Santos & Dalton Andrade. (2020) Item Response Theory-based validation of a short form of the Disordered Eating Attitude Scale (DEAS-s) to a Brazilian sample. Cadernos de Saúde Pública 36:2.
Crossref
Crossref
Helfried Moosbrugger & Holger Brandt. 2020. Testtheorie und Fragebogenkonstruktion. Testtheorie und Fragebogenkonstruktion
91
117
.
Metin YAŞAR. (2019) Development of a “Perceived Stress Scale" Based on Classical Test Theory and Graded Response ModelDevelopment of a “Perceived Stress Scale" Based on Classical Test Theory and Graded Response Model. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education 6:3, pages 522-538.
Crossref
Crossref
Sadaf Ashtari & Al Bellamy. (2019) Factors Impacting Use of Health IT Applications. International Journal of Healthcare Information Systems and Informatics 14:4, pages 33-55.
Crossref
Crossref
Thanise Sabrina Souza Santos, Cristina Julian, Dalton Francisco de Andrade, Betzabeth Slater Villar, Raffaela Piccinelli, Marcela González-Gross, Fréderic Gottrand, Odysseas Androutsos, Mathilde Kersting, Nathalie Michels, Inge Huybrechts, Kurt Widhalm, Dénes Molnár, Ascensión Marcos, Manuel J Castillo-Garzón & Luis A Moreno. (2018) Measuring nutritional knowledge using Item Response Theory and its validity in European adolescents. Public Health Nutrition 22:3, pages 419-430.
Crossref
Crossref
Seang-Hwane Joo, Seokjoon Chun, Stephen Stark & Olexander S. Chernyshenko. (2018) Item Parameter Estimation With the General Hyperbolic Cosine Ideal Point IRT Model. Applied Psychological Measurement 43:1, pages 18-33.
Crossref
Crossref
Rodrigo Schames Kreitchmann, Francisco José Abad & Vicente Ponsoda. (2018) A Two-Dimensional Multiple-Choice Model Accounting for Omissions. Frontiers in Psychology 9.
Crossref
Crossref
Manuel Martín-Fernández, Enrique Gracia & Marisol Lila. (2018) Assessing Victim-Blaming Attitudes in Cases of Intimate Partner Violence against Women: Development and Validation of the VB-IPVAW Scale. Psychosocial Intervention 27:3, pages 133-143.
Crossref
Crossref
Louis Tay & Andrew T. Jebb. (2018) Establishing Construct Continua in Construct Validation: The Process of Continuum Specification. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science 1:3, pages 375-388.
Crossref
Crossref
Seang-Hwane Joo, Philseok Lee & Stephen Stark. (2018) Development of Information Functions and Indices for the GGUM-RANK Multidimensional Forced Choice IRT Model. Journal of Educational Measurement 55:3, pages 357-372.
Crossref
Crossref
Qishan Chen, Yurou Kong, Wenyang Gao & Lei Mo. (2018) Effects of Socioeconomic Status, Parent–Child Relationship, and Learning Motivation on Reading Ability. Frontiers in Psychology 9.
Crossref
Crossref
Manuel Martín-Fernández, Enrique Gracia, Miriam Marco, Viviana Vargas, Faraj A. Santirso & Marisol Lila. (2018) Measuring Acceptability of Intimate Partner Violence Against Women: Development and Validation of the A-IPVAW Scale. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context 10:1, pages 26-34.
Crossref
Crossref
Jing-Jing Wang, Tzu-An Chen, Tom Baranowski & Patrick W.C. Lau. (2017) Item response modeling: a psychometric assessment of the children’s fruit, vegetable, water, and physical activity self-efficacy scales among Chinese children. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 14:1.
Crossref
Crossref
Ute-Christine Klehe & Neil Anderson. 2017. The Blackwell Handbook of Personnel Selection. The Blackwell Handbook of Personnel Selection
329
353
.
Garett C. Foster, Hanyi Min & Michael J. Zickar. (2017) Review of Item Response Theory Practices in Organizational Research. Organizational Research Methods 20:3, pages 465-486.
Crossref
Crossref
Stefanie A. Wind. (2017) An Instructional Module on Mokken Scale Analysis. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 36:2, pages 50-66.
Crossref
Crossref
Yueng-hsiang Huang, Jin Lee, Zhuo Chen, MacKenna Perry, Janelle H. Cheung & Mo Wang. (2017) An item-response theory approach to safety climate measurement: The Liberty Mutual Safety Climate Short Scales. Accident Analysis & Prevention 103, pages 96-104.
Crossref
Crossref
Louis Tay & Lauren Kuykendall. (2016) Why Self-Reports of Happiness and Sadness May Not Necessarily Contradict Bipolarity: A Psychometric Review and Proposal. Emotion Review 9:2, pages 146-154.
Crossref
Crossref
Jorge N. Tendeiro. (2016) The lz(p)* Person-Fit Statistic in an Unfolding Model Context. Applied Psychological Measurement 41:1, pages 44-59.
Crossref
Crossref
Mengyang Cao, Louis Tay & Yaowu Liu. (2016) A Monte Carlo Study of an Iterative Wald Test Procedure for DIF Analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement 77:1, pages 104-118.
Crossref
Crossref
Stefano Rainelli, Rebecca J. Bulotsky-Shearer, Veronica A. Fernandez, Daryl B. Greenfield & Michael López. (2017) Validity of the first two subtests of the preschool language assessment scale as a language screener for Spanish-speaking preschool children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly 38, pages 10-22.
Crossref
Crossref
Stefanie A. Wind & George EngelhardJr.Jr.. (2015) Exploring Rating Quality in Rater-Mediated Assessments Using Mokken Scale Analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement 76:4, pages 685-706.
Crossref
Crossref
Nathan T. Carter, Li Guan, Jessica L. Maples, Rachel L. Williamson & Joshua D. Miller. (2016) The Downsides of Extreme Conscientiousness for Psychological Well-being: The Role of Obsessive Compulsive Tendencies. Journal of Personality 84:4, pages 510-522.
Crossref
Crossref
Matthew L. LaPalme, Wei Wang, Dana L. Joseph, Donald H. Saklofske & Gonggu Yan. (2016) Measurement equivalence of the Wong and Law Emotional Intelligence Scale across cultures: An item response theory approach. Personality and Individual Differences 90, pages 190-198.
Crossref
Crossref
Dev K. Dalal, Dalia L. Diab, Xiaoyuan Susan Zhu & Timothy Hwang. (2015) Understanding the Construct of Maximizing Tendency: A Theoretical and Empirical Evaluation. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 28:5, pages 437-450.
Crossref
Crossref
Leonidas A. Zampetakis, Manolis Lerakis, Konstantinos Kafetsios & Vassilis Moustakis. (2015) Using item response theory to investigate the structure of anticipated affect: do self-reports about future affective reactions conform to typical or maximal models?. Frontiers in Psychology 6.
Crossref
Crossref
Rafael Lucian & Jairo Simião Dornelas. (2015) Mensuração de Atitude: Proposição de um Protocolo de Elaboração de Escalas. Revista de Administração Contemporânea 19:spe2, pages 157-177.
Crossref
Crossref
Tzu-An Chen, Teresia M. O'Connor, Sheryl O. Hughes, Alicia Beltran, Janice Baranowski, Cassandra Diep & Tom Baranowski. (2015) Vegetable parenting practices scale. Item response modeling analyses. Appetite 91, pages 190-199.
Crossref
Crossref
Mengyang Cao, Fritz Drasgow & Seonghee Cho. (2014) Developing Ideal Intermediate Personality Items for the Ideal Point Model. Organizational Research Methods 18:2, pages 252-275.
Crossref
Crossref
Wei Wang, Jimmy de la Torre & Fritz Drasgow. (2014) MCMC GGUM. Applied Psychological Measurement 39:2, pages 160-161.
Crossref
Crossref
Lucas De Francisco Carvalho, Ananias Queroiga De Oliveira Filho, Fernando Pessotto & Silvana Ligia Vincenzi Bortolotti. (2015) Application of the Unfolding Model to the Aggression Dimension of the Dimensional Clinical Personality Inventory (IDCP). Revista Colombiana de Psicología 23:2.
Crossref
Crossref
W. Paul Jones. (2014) Enhancing a Short Measure of Big Five Personality Traits With Bayesian Scaling. Educational and Psychological Measurement 74:6, pages 1049-1066.
Crossref
Crossref
Jean M. Twenge, W. Keith Campbell & Nathan T. Carter. (2014) Declines in Trust in Others and Confidence in Institutions Among American Adults and Late Adolescents, 1972–2012. Psychological Science 25:10, pages 1914-1923.
Crossref
Crossref
Dev K. Dalal, Nathan T. Carter & Christopher J. Lake. (2013) Middle Response Scale Options are Inappropriate for Ideal Point Scales. Journal of Business and Psychology 29:3, pages 463-478.
Crossref
Crossref
Stéphanie M. van den Berg, Marleen H. M. de Moor, Matt McGue, Erik Pettersson, Antonio Terracciano, Karin J. H. Verweij, Najaf Amin, Jaime Derringer, Tõnu Esko, Gerard van Grootheest, Narelle K. Hansell, Jennifer Huffman, Bettina Konte, Jari Lahti, Michelle Luciano, Lindsay K. Matteson, Alexander Viktorin, Jasper Wouda, Arpana Agrawal, Jüri Allik, Laura Bierut, Ulla Broms, Harry Campbell, George Davey Smith, Johan G. Eriksson, Luigi Ferrucci, Barbera Franke, Jean-Paul Fox, Eco J. C. de Geus, Ina Giegling, Alan J. Gow, Richard Grucza, Annette M. Hartmann, Andrew C. Heath, Kauko Heikkilä, William G. Iacono, Joost Janzing, Markus Jokela, Lambertus Kiemeney, Terho Lehtimäki, Pamela A. F. Madden, Patrik K. E. Magnusson, Kate Northstone, Teresa Nutile, Klaasjan G. Ouwens, Aarno Palotie, Alison Pattie, Anu-Katriina Pesonen, Ozren Polasek, Lea Pulkkinen, Laura Pulkki-Råback, Olli T. Raitakari, Anu Realo, Richard J. Rose, Daniela Ruggiero, Ilkka Seppälä, Wendy S. Slutske, David C. Smyth, Rossella Sorice, John M. Starr, Angelina R. Sutin, Toshiko Tanaka, Josine Verhagen, Sita Vermeulen, Eero Vuoksimaa, Elisabeth Widen, Gonneke Willemsen, Margaret J. Wright, Lina Zgaga, Dan Rujescu, Andres Metspalu, James F. Wilson, Marina Ciullo, Caroline Hayward, Igor Rudan, Ian J. Deary, Katri Räikkönen, Alejandro Arias Vasquez, Paul T. Costa, Liisa Keltikangas-Järvinen, Cornelia M. van Duijn, Brenda W. J. H. Penninx, Robert F. Krueger, David M. Evans, Jaakko Kaprio, Nancy L. Pedersen, Nicholas G. Martin & Dorret I. Boomsma. (2014) Harmonization of Neuroticism and Extraversion phenotypes across inventories and cohorts in the Genetics of Personality Consortium: an application of Item Response Theory. Behavior Genetics 44:4, pages 295-313.
Crossref
Crossref
Nathan T. Carter, Lindsey M. Kotrba & Christopher J. Lake. (2012) Null Results in Assessing Survey Score Comparability: Illustrating Measurement Invariance Using Item Response Theory. Journal of Business and Psychology 29:2, pages 205-220.
Crossref
Crossref
Jüri Allik. (2014) A mixed-binomial model for Likert-type personality measures. Frontiers in Psychology 5.
Crossref
Crossref
Paul Irwing, Tom Booth & Mark Batey. (2014) An Investigation of the Factor Structure of the 16PF, Version 5. Journal of Individual Differences 35:1, pages 38-46.
Crossref
Crossref
Anzalee Khan, Jean-Pierre Lindenmayer, Mark Opler, Christian Yavorsky, Brian Rothman & Luka Lucic. (2013) A new Integrated Negative Symptom structure of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) in schizophrenia using item response analysis. Schizophrenia Research 150:1, pages 185-196.
Crossref
Crossref
Rebecca J. Bulotsky-Shearer, Veronica A. Fernandez & Stefano Rainelli. (2013) The validity of the Devereux Early Childhood Assessment for culturally and linguistically diverse Head Start children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly 28:4, pages 794-807.
Crossref
Crossref
Wei Wang, Louis Tay & Fritz Drasgow. (2013) Detecting Differential Item Functioning of Polytomous Items for an Ideal Point Response Process. Applied Psychological Measurement 37:4, pages 316-335.
Crossref
Crossref
Louis Tay & Fritz Drasgow. (2012) Theoretical, Statistical, and Substantive Issues in the Assessment of Construct Dimensionality. Organizational Research Methods 15:3, pages 363-384.
Crossref
Crossref
Louis Tay & Fritz Drasgow. (2011)
Adjusting the Adjusted χ
2
/
df
Ratio Statistic for Dichotomous Item Response Theory Analyses
. Educational and Psychological Measurement 72:3, pages 510-528.
Crossref
Crossref
DongGun Park, MyungOk Choi, WonSun Lee, HyeMin Lee & JunHee Lee. (2012) Comparison between dominance process model and ideal point response model for personality assesment. Korean Journal of Industrial and Organizational Psychology 25:2, pages 421-452.
Crossref
Crossref
Glenda S. Stump, Jenefer Husman & Sarah K. Brem. (2012) The Nursing Student Self-Efficacy Scale. Nursing Research 61:3, pages 149-158.
Crossref
Crossref
Jüri Allik, Anu Realo, René Mõttus, Peter Borkenau, Peter Kuppens & Martina Hřebíčková. (2012) Person-Fit to the Five Factor Model of Personality. Swiss Journal of Psychology 71:1, pages 35-45.
Crossref
Crossref
Timo Gnambs & Bernad Batinic. (2011) Polytomous Adaptive Classification Testing. Educational and Psychological Measurement 71:6, pages 1006-1022.
Crossref
Crossref
Erin O'Brien & David M. LaHuis. (2011) Do Applicants and Incumbents Respond to Personality Items Similarly? A Comparison of Dominance and Ideal Point Response Models. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 19:2, pages 109-118.
Crossref
Crossref
Matthew D. Finkelman, Jennifer Greif Green,Michael J. Gruber & Alan M. Zaslavsky. (2011)
A zero‐ and
K
‐inflated mixture model for health questionnaire data
. Statistics in Medicine 30:9, pages 1028-1043.
Crossref
Crossref
Stephen StarkOleksandr S. Chernyshenko & Nigel Guenole. (2010) Can Subject Matter Experts’ Ratings of Statement Extremity Be Used to Streamline the Development of Unidimensional Pairwise Preference Scales?. Organizational Research Methods 14:2, pages 256-278.
Crossref
Crossref
Nathan T. CarterDev K. Dalal, Christopher J. Lake, Bing C. Lin & Michael J. Zickar. (2010) Using Mixed-Model Item Response Theory to Analyze Organizational Survey Responses: An Illustration Using the Job Descriptive Index. Organizational Research Methods 14:1, pages 116-146.
Crossref
Crossref
David M. LaHuisPatrick Clark & Erin O'Brien. (2009) An Examination of Item Response Theory Item Fit Indices for the Graded Response Model. Organizational Research Methods 14:1, pages 10-23.
Crossref
Crossref
Leonidas A. Zampetakis. 2011. What Have We Learned? Ten Years On. What Have We Learned? Ten Years On
289
315
.
Fritz Drasgow, Oleksandr S. Chernyshenko & Stephen Stark. (2015) 75 Years After Likert: Thurstone Was Right!. Industrial and Organizational Psychology 3:4, pages 465-476.
Crossref
Crossref
LEONIDAS A. ZAMPETAKIS. (2011) Unfolding the Measurement of the Creative Personality. The Journal of Creative Behavior 44:2, pages 105-123.
Crossref
Crossref
Heather H. McIntyre. (2010) Gender differences in the nature and linkage of higher-order personality factors to trait and ability emotional intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences 48:5, pages 617-622.
Crossref
Crossref
Pablo Rebollo, Eduardo García Cueto, Pilar C. Zardaín, Jesús Cuervo, Ignacio Martínez, Jordi Alonso, Montserrat Ferrer & José Muñiz. (2009) Desarrollo del CAT-Health, primer test adaptativo informatizado para la evaluación de la calidad de vida relacionada con la salud en España. Medicina Clínica 133:7, pages 241-251.
Crossref
Crossref
Gabriel E. Lopez Rivas, Stephen StarkOleksandr S. Chernyshenko. (2008) The Effects of Referent Item Parameters on Differential Item Functioning Detection Using the Free Baseline Likelihood Ratio Test. Applied Psychological Measurement 33:4, pages 251-265.
Crossref
Crossref
NATHAN R KUNCEL & AUKE TELLEGEN. (2009) A CONCEPTUAL AND EMPIRICAL REEXAMINATION OF THE MEASUREMENT OF THE SOCIAL DESIRABILITY OF ITEMS: IMPLICATIONS FOR DETECTING DESIRABLE RESPONSE STYLE AND SCALE DEVELOPMENT. Personnel Psychology 62:2, pages 201-228.
Crossref
Crossref
Yebing Yang, Danmin Miao, Jianquan Tian, Xufeng Liu & Xia Zhu. (2009) A Real Data Simulation Study of Computerized Adaptive Testing of Chinese Soldier Personality Questionnaire. A Real Data Simulation Study of Computerized Adaptive Testing of Chinese Soldier Personality Questionnaire.
Francisco J. AbadJulio Olea & Vicente Ponsoda. (2009) The Multiple-Choice Model. Applied Psychological Measurement 33:3, pages 200-221.
Crossref
Crossref
David M. LaHuisDerek Copeland. (2008) Investigating Faking Using a Multilevel Logistic Regression Approach to Measuring Person Fit. Organizational Research Methods 12:2, pages 296-319.
Crossref
Crossref
Ye-Bing YANG. (2008) Item Analysis of the Chinese Soldier Personality Questionnaire Using Item Response Theory. Acta Psychologica Sinica 40:5, pages 611-617.
Crossref
Crossref
Wilco H. M. Emons. (2008) Nonparametric Person-Fit Analysis of Polytomous Item Scores. Applied Psychological Measurement 32:3, pages 224-247.
Crossref
Crossref
Anke M. Weekers & Rob R. Meijer. (2008) Scaling Response Processes on Personality Items Using Unfolding and Dominance Models. European Journal of Psychological Assessment 24:1, pages 65-77.
Crossref
Crossref
Wolfgang A. Rauch, Karl Schweizer & Helfried Moosbrugger. (2008) An IRT Analysis of the Personal Optimism Scale. European Journal of Psychological Assessment 24:1, pages 49-56.
Crossref
Crossref
A. Michiel HolHarrie C. M. Vorst & Gideon J. Mellenbergh. (2016) Computerized Adaptive Testing for Polytomous Motivation Items: Administration Mode Effects and a Comparison With Short Forms. Applied Psychological Measurement 31:5, pages 412-429.
Crossref
Crossref
J. Douglas Carroll, Bruce A. Williams & Michael V. Levine. (2007) Multidimensional modeling with unidimensional approximations. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 51:4, pages 207-228.
Crossref
Crossref
Víctor J. Rubio, David Aguado, Pedro M. Hontangas & José M. Hernández. (2007) Psychometric Properties of an Emotional Adjustment Measure. European Journal of Psychological Assessment 23:1, pages 39-46.
Crossref
Crossref
Carol M. Woods. (2006) Ramsay-curve item response theory (RC-IRT) to detect and correct for nonnormal latent variables.. Psychological Methods 11:3, pages 253-270.
Crossref
Crossref
Harry Joe & Albert Maydeu-Olivares. (2006) On the asymptotic distribution of Pearson’s X 2 in cross-validation samples. Psychometrika 71:3, pages 587-592.
Crossref
Crossref
José M. HernándezVíctor J. Rubio, Javier Revuelta & José Santacreu. (2016) A Procedure for Estimating Intrasubject Behavior Consistency. Educational and Psychological Measurement 66:3, pages 417-434.
Crossref
Crossref
Hugo Zagorsek, Stanley J. Stough & Marko Jaklic. (2006) Analysis of the Reliability of the Leadership Practices Inventory in the Item Response Theory Framework. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 14:2, pages 180-191.
Crossref
Crossref
Jimmy de la TorreStephan Stark & Oleksandr S. Chernyshenko. (2016) Markov Chain Monte Carlo Estimation of Item Parameters for the Generalized Graded Unfolding Model. Applied Psychological Measurement 30:3, pages 216-232.
Crossref
Crossref
Elizabeth J. Austin, Ian J. Deary & Vincent Egan. (2006) Individual differences in response scale use: Mixed Rasch modelling of responses to NEO-FFI items. Personality and Individual Differences 40:6, pages 1235-1245.
Crossref
Crossref
Stephen Stark, Oleksandr S. Chernyshenko, Fritz Drasgow & Bruce A. Williams. (2006) Examining assumptions about item responding in personality assessment: Should ideal point methods be considered for scale development and scoring?. Journal of Applied Psychology 91:1, pages 25-39.
Crossref
Crossref
Stephen StarkOleksandr S. Chernyshenko & Fritz Drasgow. (2016) An IRT Approach to Constructing and Scoring Pairwise Preference Items Involving Stimuli on Different Dimensions: The Multi-Unidimensional Pairwise-Preference Model. Applied Psychological Measurement 29:3, pages 184-203.
Crossref
Crossref
Oleksandr S. Chernyshenko & Stephen Stark. 2005. Encyclopedia of Social Measurement. Encyclopedia of Social Measurement
957
963
.
Richard B. Fletcher & John A. Hattie. (2004) An examination of the psychometric properties of the physical self-description questionnaire using a polytomous item response model. Psychology of Sport and Exercise 5:4, pages 423-446.
Crossref
Crossref
Ana Hernández, Fritz Drasgow & Vicente González-Romá. (2004) Investigating the Functioning of a Middle Category by Means of a Mixed-Measurement Model.. Journal of Applied Psychology 89:4, pages 687-699.
Crossref
Crossref
Rob R. Meijer & Joost J. Baneke. (2004) Analyzing Psychopathology Items: A Case for Nonparametric Item Response Theory Modeling.. Psychological Methods 9:3, pages 354-368.
Crossref
Crossref
Michael V. Levine. (2003) Dimension in latent variable models. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 47:4, pages 450-466.
Crossref
Crossref
Susana Lloret Segura & Vicente González-Romá. (2003) How Do Respondents Construe Ambiguous Response Formats of Affect Items?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85:5, pages 956-968.
Crossref
Crossref