102
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Do Reactions to Tests Produce Changes in the Construct Measured?

Pages 105-126 | Published online: 10 Jun 2010

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (1)

Qin Xie. (2011) Is Test Taker Perception of Assessment Related to Construct Validity?. International Journal of Testing 11:4, pages 324-348.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (10)

Heng-Tsung Danny Huang & Shao-Ting Alan Hung. (2017) EFL Test-Takers’ Feedback on Integrated Speaking Assessment. TESOL Quarterly 51:1, pages 166-179.
Crossref
Stephen W. Gilliland & Dirk D. Steiner. 2012. The Oxford Handbook of Personnel Assessment and Selection. The Oxford Handbook of Personnel Assessment and Selection 629 666 .
Silvia Bonaccio, Charlie L. Reeve & Eboni C. Winford. (2012) Text anxiety on cognitive ability test can result in differential predictive validity of academic performance. Personality and Individual Differences 52:4, pages 497-502.
Crossref
Charlie L. Reeve & Silvia Bonaccio. (2008) Does test anxiety induce measurement bias in cognitive ability tests?. Intelligence 36:6, pages 526-538.
Crossref
Justin C. Perry, Anmol Satiani, Kevin T. Henze, Jackquelyn Mascher & Janet E. Helms. (2011) Why Is There Still No Study of Cultural Equivalence in Standardized Cognitive Ability Tests? . Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development 36:3, pages 155-167.
Crossref
Charlie L. Reeve & Holly Lam. (2007) Consideration of g as a common antecedent for cognitive ability test performance, test motivation, and perceived fairness. Intelligence 35:4, pages 347-358.
Crossref
Neil Anderson, Filip Lievens, Karen van Dam & Ann Marie Ryan. (2004) Future Perspectives on Employee Selection: Key Directions for Future Research and Practice. Applied Psychology 53:4, pages 487-501.
Crossref
N. Schmitt, F. L. Oswald, B. H. Kim, M. A. Gillespie & L. J. Ramsay. (2004) The Impact of Justice and Self-Serving Bias Explanations of the Perceived Fairness of Different Types of Selection Tests. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 12:1-2, pages 160-171.
Crossref
Eva Derous, Marise Ph. Born & Karel De Witte. (2004) How Applicants Want and Expect to Be Treated: Applicants' Selection Treatment Beliefs and the Development of the Social Process Questionnaire on Selection. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 12:1-2, pages 99-119.
Crossref
David Chan & Neal Schmitt. (2004) An Agenda for Future Research on Applicant Reactions to Selection Procedures: A Construct-Oriented Approach. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 12:1-2, pages 9-23.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.