Advanced search
Publication Cover
Basic and Applied Social Psychology Volume 18, 1996 - Issue 2
Submit an article Journal homepage
37
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Personal Attitudes, Constraint Magnitude, and Correspondence Bias

Mark D. Alicke
,
Jennifer I. Zerbst
&
Frank M. LoSchiavo
Pages 211-228 | Published online: 07 Jun 2010

Citations (8)

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Subscribe to citation updates

Read on this site (2)

Jonas Colliander & Susanna Erlandsson. (2015) The blog and the bountiful: Exploring the effects of disguised product placement on blogs that are revealed by a third party. Journal of Marketing Communications 21:2, pages 110-124.
Read now
Bertram Gawronski. (2004) Theory-based bias correction in dispositional inference: The fundamental attribution error is dead, long live the correspondence bias. European Review of Social Psychology 15:1, pages 183-217.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (6)

Peter Meindl, Kate M. Johnson & Jesse Graham. (2016) The Immoral Assumption Effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 42:4, pages 540-553.
Crossref
John Paley. (2015) Francis, fatalism and the fundamental attribution error: A reply to Philip Darbyshire. Nurse Education Today 35:3, pages 468-473.
Crossref
Michelle Horhota & Fredda Blanchard–Fields. (2006) Do Beliefs and Attributional Complexity Influence Age Differences in the Correspondence Bias?. Social Cognition 24:3, pages 310-337.
Crossref
Kimberly Renk. (2005) Cross-Informant Ratings of the Behavior of Children and Adolescents: The “Gold Standard”. Journal of Child and Family Studies 14:4, pages 457-468.
Crossref
Jack C. Wright & Audrey L. Zakriski. (2001) A contextual analysis of externalizing and mixed syndrome boys: When syndromal similarity obscures functional dissimilarity.. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 69:3, pages 457-470.
Crossref
Mark D. Alicke, Frank M. Loschiavo & Justin T. Buckingham. (2000) Attitude Transference. Social Cognition 18:1, pages 1-34.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.