Citations (142)
Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.
Read on this site (23)
Joshua K. Wood, Jeromy Anglim & Sharon Horwood. (2023) Less Evaluative Measures of Personality in Job Applicant Contexts: The Effect on Socially Desirable Responding and Criterion Validity. Journal of Personality Assessment 0:0, pages 1-12.
Read now
Read now
Seang-Hwane Joo, Philseok Lee & Stephen Stark. (2023) Modeling Multidimensional Forced Choice Measures with the Zinnes and Griggs Pairwise Preference Item Response Theory Model. Multivariate Behavioral Research 58:2, pages 241-261.
Read now
Read now
Kyosuke Bunji & Kensuke Okada. (2022) Linear Ballistic Accumulator Item Response Theory Model for Multidimensional Multiple-Alternative Forced-Choice Measurement of Personality. Multivariate Behavioral Research 57:4, pages 658-678.
Read now
Read now
Kate E. Walton, Justine Radunzel, Raeal Moore, Jeremy Burrus, Cristina Anguiano-Carrasco & Dana Murano. (2021) Adjectives vs. Statements in Forced Choice and Likert Item Types: Which Is More Resistant to Impression Management in Personality Assessment?. Journal of Personality Assessment 103:6, pages 842-853.
Read now
Read now
Vincent Ng, Philseok Lee, Moon-Ho Ringo Ho, Lauren Kuykendall, Stephen Stark & Louis Tay. (2021) The Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Forced-Choice Format Character Measure: Testing the Thurstonian IRT Approach. Journal of Personality Assessment 103:2, pages 224-237.
Read now
Read now
Ingvild Saksvik-Lehouillier, Ingrid Børstad Eriksen & Eva Langvik. (2020) A candidate perspective on personality testing in the selection process: The use of strategies and criteria for a positive experience. Cogent Psychology 7:1.
Read now
Read now
John D. Trent, Laura G. Barron, Mark R. Rose & Thomas R. Carretta. (2020) Tailored Adaptive Personality Assessment System (TAPAS) as an indicator for counterproductive work behavior: Comparing validity in applicant, honest, and directed faking conditions. Military Psychology 32:1, pages 51-59.
Read now
Read now
Michelle R. Persich, Jessica L. Bair, Becker Steinemann, Stephanie Nelson, Adam K. Fetterman & Michael D. Robinson. (2019) Hello darkness my old friend: preferences for darkness vary by neuroticism and co-occur with negative affect. Cognition and Emotion 33:5, pages 885-900.
Read now
Read now
Dirk H.M. Pelt, Dimitri van der Linden & Marise Ph Born. (2018) How Emotional Intelligence Might Get You the Job: The Relationship Between Trait Emotional Intelligence and Faking on Personality Tests. Human Performance 31:1, pages 33-54.
Read now
Read now
Daniel L. Murphy & Bradley A. Ermeling. (2016) Feedback on reflection: comparing rating-scale and forced-choice formats for measuring and facilitating teacher team reflective practice. Reflective Practice 17:3, pages 317-333.
Read now
Read now
Erin M. Richard & Patrick D. Converse. (2016) An examination of within-person variance in contextual display rules and deviation from display rules. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 25:3, pages 412-429.
Read now
Read now
Salim Qadri, Nicola A. Parkin & Philip E. Benson. (2016) Space closing versus space opening for bilateral missing upper laterals – aesthetic judgments of laypeople: a web-based survey. Journal of Orthodontics 43:2, pages 137-146.
Read now
Read now
JesúsF. Salgado & Gabriel Táuriz. (2014) The Five-Factor Model, forced-choice personality inventories and performance: A comprehensive meta-analysis of academic and occupational validity studies. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 23:1, pages 3-30.
Read now
Read now
Ute-Christine Klehe, Martin Kleinmann, Thomas Hartstein, Klaus
G. Melchers, Cornelius
J. König, Peter
A. Heslin & Filip Lievens. (2012) Responding to Personality Tests in a Selection Context: The Role of the Ability to Identify Criteria and the Ideal-Employee Factor. Human Performance 25:4, pages 273-302.
Read now
Read now
Jill
E. Ellingson & Lynn
A. McFarland. (2011) Understanding Faking Behavior Through the Lens of Motivation: An Application of VIE Theory. Human Performance 24:4, pages 322-337.
Read now
Read now
Gary
N. Burns & Neil
D. Christiansen. (2011) Methods of Measuring Faking Behavior. Human Performance 24:4, pages 358-372.
Read now
Read now
Robert
P. Tett & Daniel
V. Simonet. (2011) Faking in Personality Assessment: A “Multisaturation” Perspective on Faking as Performance. Human Performance 24:4, pages 302-321.
Read now
Read now
Stephen Stark, Oleksandr
S. Chernyshenko, Fritz Drasgow, Wayne
C. Lee, Leonard
A. White & Mark
C. Young. (2011) Optimizing Prediction of Attrition With the U.S. Army's Assessment of Individual Motivation (AIM). Military Psychology 23:2, pages 180-201.
Read now
Read now
Chet Robie, Shawn Komar & DouglasJ. Brown. (2010) The Effects of Coaching and Speeding on Big Five and Impression Management Scale Scores. Human Performance 23:5, pages 446-467.
Read now
Read now
PatrickD. Converse, Jaya Pathak, Joshua Quist, Matthew Merbedone, Tomer Gotlib & Edward Kostic. (2010) Statement Desirability Ratings in Forced-Choice Personality Measure Development: Implications for Reducing Score Inflation and Providing Trait-Level Information. Human Performance 23:4, pages 323-342.
Read now
Read now
Chet Robie, Simon Taggar & DouglasJ. Brown. (2009) The Effects of Warnings and Speeding on Scale Scores and Convergent Validity of Conscientiousness. Human Performance 22:4, pages 340-354.
Read now
Read now
OleksandrS. Chernyshenko, Stephen Stark, MatthewS. Prewett, AshleyA. Gray, FrederickR. Stilson & MatthewD. Tuttle. (2009) Normative Scoring of Multidimensional Pairwise Preference Personality Scales Using IRT: Empirical Comparisons With Other Formats. Human Performance 22:2, pages 105-127.
Read now
Read now
Nicholas L. Vasilopoulos, Jeffrey M. Cucina, Natalia V. Dyomina, Courtney L. Morewitz & Richard R. Reilly. (2006) Forced-Choice Personality Tests:
A Measure of Personality and Cognitive Ability?. Human Performance 19:3, pages 175-199.
Read now
Read now
Articles from other publishers (119)
Jane Phillips & Chet Robie. (2024) Can a computer outfake a human?. Personality and Individual Differences 217, pages 112434.
Crossref
Crossref
Jianbin Fu, Xuan Tan & Patrick C. Kyllonen. (2023) Information Functions of Rank‐2PL Models for Forced‐Choice Questionnaires. Journal of Educational Measurement.
Crossref
Crossref
Hugo M. Kehr, Dorena Graff & Cafer Bakaç. (2022) Followers’ Motives as Moderators of the Effects of Transformational Leadership Behaviors on Follower Outcomes and Leaders’ Influence. Journal of Business and Psychology 38:4, pages 865-886.
Crossref
Crossref
Sabah Rasheed & Chet Robie. (2023) Faking resistance of a quasi‐ipsative RIASEC occupational interest measure. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 31:2, pages 321-335.
Crossref
Crossref
Yin Lin, Anna Brown & Paul Williams. (2022) Multidimensional Forced-Choice CAT With Dominance Items: An Empirical Comparison With Optimal Static Testing Under Different Desirability Matching. Educational and Psychological Measurement 83:2, pages 322-350.
Crossref
Crossref
HyeSun Lee. (2022) Reduction of faking with the use of a forced‐choice personality test: Cross‐cultural comparisons between South Korea and the United States. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 31:1, pages 147-162.
Crossref
Crossref
Hung-Yu Huang. (2022) Diagnostic Classification Model for Forced-Choice Items and Noncognitive Tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement 83:1, pages 146-180.
Crossref
Crossref
Alexandra Martínez, Jesús F. Salgado & Mario Lado. (2022) Quasi-ipsative Forced-Choice Personality Inventories and the Control of Faking: The Biasing Effects of Transient Error. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones 38:3, pages 241-248.
Crossref
Crossref
Lauren J. Wegmeyer & Andrew B. Speer. (2022) Understanding, detecting, and deterring faking on interest inventories. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 30:4, pages 562-578.
Crossref
Crossref
Kate E. Walton, Jeremy Burrus, Dana Murano, Cristina Anguiano-Carrasco, Jason Way & Richard D. Roberts. (2022) A Big Five-Based Multimethod Social and Emotional Skills Assessment: The Mosaic™ by ACT® Social Emotional Learning Assessment. Journal of Intelligence 10:4, pages 72.
Crossref
Crossref
Joshua K. Wood, Jeromy Anglim & Sharon Horwood. (2022) Effect of job applicant faking and cognitive ability on self‐other agreement and criterion validity of personality assessments. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 30:3, pages 378-391.
Crossref
Crossref
Yin Lin. (2021) Reliability Estimates for IRT-Based Forced-Choice Assessment Scores. Organizational Research Methods 25:3, pages 575-590.
Crossref
Crossref
Jesús F. Salgado, Dámaris Cuadrado & Silvia Moscoso. (2022) Counterproductive Academic Behaviors and Academic Performance: A Meta-Analysis and a Path Analysis Model. Frontiers in Psychology 13.
Crossref
Crossref
Xue-Lan Qiu, Jimmy de la Torre, Sage Ro & Wen-Chung Wang. (2022) Computerized Adaptive Testing for Ipsative Tests with Multidimensional Pairwise-Comparison Items: Algorithm Development and Applications. Applied Psychological Measurement 46:4, pages 255-272.
Crossref
Crossref
Philseok Lee, Seang-Hwane Joo, Steven Zhou & Mina Son. (2022) Investigating the impact of negatively keyed statements on multidimensional forced-choice personality measures: A comparison of partially ipsative and IRT scoring methods. Personality and Individual Differences 191, pages 111555.
Crossref
Crossref
Susanne Frick. (2021) Modeling Faking in the Multidimensional Forced-Choice Format: The Faking Mixture Model. Psychometrika 87:2, pages 773-794.
Crossref
Crossref
Patrick D. Dunlop, Djurre Holtrop, Liam M. Ashby, Anupama Bharadwaj & John J. Donovan. (2022) Valence, Instrumentality, Expectancy, and Ability as Determinants of Faking, and the Effects of Faking on Criterion-Related Validity. Journal of Business and Psychology.
Crossref
Crossref
Jason D. Way, Dana Murano & Kate E. Walton. 2022. Social and Emotional Learning and Complex Skills Assessment. Social and Emotional Learning and Complex Skills Assessment
9
26
.
Andrew B. Speer & Angie Y. Delacruz. (2021) Introducing a supervised alternative to forced‐choice personality scoring: A test of validity and resistance to faking. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 29:3-4, pages 448-466.
Crossref
Crossref
Goran Pavlov, Dexin Shi, Alberto Maydeu-Olivares & Amanda Fairchild. (2021) Item desirability matching in forced-choice test construction. Personality and Individual Differences 183, pages 111114.
Crossref
Crossref
Godson A. Tetteh, Kwasi Amoako-Gyampah & Amoako Kwarteng. (2021) Detecting faking responses during empirical research: a study in a developing country environment. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma 12:5, pages 889-922.
Crossref
Crossref
Alexandra Martínez & Jesús F. Salgado. (2021) A Meta-Analysis of the Faking Resistance of Forced-Choice Personality Inventories. Frontiers in Psychology 12.
Crossref
Crossref
Dirk H. M. Pelt, Dimitri Van der Linden, Curtis S. Dunkel & Marise Ph. Born. (2019) The Motivation and Opportunity for Socially Desirable Responding Does Not Alter the General Factor of Personality. Assessment 28:5, pages 1376-1396.
Crossref
Crossref
Alexandra Martínez, Silvia Moscoso & Mario Lado. (2021) Effects of Faking on the Predictive Validity of a Quasi-Ipsative Forced-Choice Personality Inventory: Implications for Sustainable Personnel Selection. Sustainability 13:8, pages 4398.
Crossref
Crossref
Alexandra Martínez, Silvia Moscoso & Mario Lado. (2021) Faking Effects on the Factor Structure of a Quasi-Ipsative Forced-Choice Personality Inventory. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones 37:1, pages 1-10.
Crossref
Crossref
Michael Schilling, Nicolas Becker, Magdalena M. Grabenhorst & Cornelius J. König. (2020) The relationship between cognitive ability and personality scores in selection situations: A meta‐analysis. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 29:1, pages 1-18.
Crossref
Crossref
Neil D. Christiansen, Chet Robie, Gary N. Burns, Robert W. Loy, Andrew B. Speer & Rick R. Jacobs. (2021) Effects of applicant response distortion on the relationship between personality trait scores and cognitive ability. Personality and Individual Differences 171, pages 110542.
Crossref
Crossref
Dev K. Dalal, Xiaoyuan (Susan) Zhu, Bertha Rangel, Anthony S. Boyce & Eleni Lobene. (2019) Improving Applicant Reactions to Forced-Choice Personality Measurement: Interventions to Reduce Threats to Test Takers’ Self-Concepts. Journal of Business and Psychology 36:1, pages 55-70.
Crossref
Crossref
Seito NONODA, Kyosuke BUNJI & Kensuke OKADA. (2021) An Estimation Method in the Paired-comparison Format Questionnaires2因子を測定する一対比較型質問紙における推定法. Kodo Keiryogaku (The Japanese Journal of Behaviormetrics) 48:2, pages 53-68.
Crossref
Crossref
Angus W. Hughes, Patrick D. Dunlop, Djurre Holtrop & Serena Wee. (2021) Spotting the “Ideal” Personality Response. Journal of Personnel Psychology 20:1, pages 17-26.
Crossref
Crossref
Inmaculada Otero, Dámaris Cuadrado & Alexandra Martínez. (2020) Convergent and Predictive Validity of the Big Five Factors Assessed with SingleStimulus and Quasi-Ipsative Questionnaires. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones 36:3, pages 215-222.
Crossref
Crossref
Dámaris Cuadrado, Jesús F. Salgado & Silvia Moscoso. (2020) Individual differences and counterproductive academic behaviors in high school. PLOS ONE 15:9, pages e0238892.
Crossref
Crossref
Michael Schilling, Jörn R. Sparfeldt, Nicolas Becker, Marie Engel, Julie Levacher, Tilman F. P. Sebastian, Juliane Schäfer, Sarah Schwabe & Cornelius J. König. (2020) Is it enough to be willing to win or do you have to be smart? The relationship between competitive worldviews, cognitive abilities, and applicant faking in personality tests. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 28:3, pages 264-282.
Crossref
Crossref
Eunike Wetzel, Susanne Frick & Samuel Greiff. (2020) The Multidimensional Forced-Choice Format as an Alternative for Rating Scales. European Journal of Psychological Assessment 36:4, pages 511-515.
Crossref
Crossref
Kyosuke Bunji & Kensuke Okada. (2020) Joint modeling of the two-alternative multidimensional forced-choice personality measurement and its response time by a Thurstonian D-diffusion item response model. Behavior Research Methods 52:3, pages 1091-1107.
Crossref
Crossref
Kate E. Walton, Lina Cherkasova & Richard D. Roberts. (2019) On the Validity of Forced Choice Scores Derived From the Thurstonian Item Response Theory Model. Assessment 27:4, pages 706-718.
Crossref
Crossref
HyeSun Lee & Weldon Z. Smith. (2019) A Bayesian Random Block Item Response Theory Model for Forced-Choice Formats. Educational and Psychological Measurement 80:3, pages 578-603.
Crossref
Crossref
Rachelle Sass, Susanne Frick, Ulf-Dietrich Reips & Eunike Wetzel. (2018) Taking the Test Taker’s Perspective: Response Process and Test Motivation in Multidimensional Forced-Choice Versus Rating Scale Instruments. Assessment 27:3, pages 572-584.
Crossref
Crossref
María Elena Oliveri. 2020. Higher Education Admissions Practices. Higher Education Admissions Practices
1
118
.
A. Susan M. Niessen & Rob R. Meijer. 2020. Higher Education Admissions Practices. Higher Education Admissions Practices
76
95
.
Ahmet Durmaz, İnci Dursun & Ebru Tümer Kabadayi. 2020. Applied Social Science Approaches to Mixed Methods Research. Applied Social Science Approaches to Mixed Methods Research
146
185
.
Cuadrado, Salgado & Moscoso. (2019) Prevalence and Correlates of Academic Dishonesty: Towards a Sustainable University. Sustainability 11:21, pages 6062.
Crossref
Crossref
Paul-Christian Bürkner, Niklas Schulte & Heinz Holling. (2019) On the Statistical and Practical Limitations of Thurstonian IRT Models. Educational and Psychological Measurement 79:5, pages 827-854.
Crossref
Crossref
Goran Pavlov, Alberto Maydeu-Olivares & Amanda J. Fairchild. (2018) Effects of Applicant Faking on Forced-Choice and Likert Scores. Organizational Research Methods 22:3, pages 710-739.
Crossref
Crossref
Luc Watrin, Mattis Geiger, Maik Spengler & Oliver Wilhelm. (2019) Forced-Choice Versus Likert Responses on an Occupational Big Five Questionnaire. Journal of Individual Differences 40:3, pages 134-148.
Crossref
Crossref
Jeffrey M. Cucina, Nicholas L. Vasilopoulos, Chihwei Su, Henry H. Busciglio, Irina Cozma, Arwen H. DeCostanza, Nicholas R. Martin & Megan N. Shaw. (2018) The Effects of Empirical Keying of Personality Measures on Faking and Criterion-Related Validity. Journal of Business and Psychology 34:3, pages 337-356.
Crossref
Crossref
Philseok Lee, Seang-Hwane Joo & Sunhee Lee. (2019) Examining stability of personality profile solutions between Likert-type and multidimensional forced choice measure. Personality and Individual Differences 142, pages 13-20.
Crossref
Crossref
Tracy M. Kantrowitz, Darrin M. Grelle & Yin Lin. 2019. The Cambridge Handbook of Technology and Employee Behavior. The Cambridge Handbook of Technology and Employee Behavior
131
150
.
David M. Dueber, Abigail M. A. Love, Michael D. Toland & Trisha A. Turner. (2018) Comparison of Single-Response Format and Forced-Choice Format Instruments Using Thurstonian Item Response Theory. Educational and Psychological Measurement 79:1, pages 108-128.
Crossref
Crossref
Daniel Morillo, Francisco J. Abad, Rodrigo S. Kreitchmann, Iwin Leenen, Pedro Hontangas & Vicente Ponsoda. (2019) The Journey from Likert to Forced-Choice Questionnaires: Evidence of the Invariance of Item Parameters. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones 35:2, pages 75-83.
Crossref
Crossref
Sooyeon Kim & Tim Moses. (2018) The Impact of Aberrant Responses and Detection in Forced‐Choice Noncognitive Assessment. ETS Research Report Series 2018:1, pages 1-15.
Crossref
Crossref
Jesús F. Salgado & Mario Lado. (2018) Faking Resistance of a Quasi-ipsative Forced-Choice Personality Inventory without Algebraic Dependence. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones 34:3, pages 213-216.
Crossref
Crossref
Giulio Vidotto, Pasquale Anselmi, Luca Filipponi, Marco Tommasi & Aristide Saggino. (2018) Using Overt and Covert Items in Self-Report Personality Tests: Susceptibility to Faking and Identifiability of Possible Fakers. Frontiers in Psychology 9.
Crossref
Crossref
Peter A. Fisher, Chet Robie, Neil D. Christiansen & Shawn Komar. (2018) The impact of psychopathy and warnings on faking behavior: A multisaturation perspective. Personality and Individual Differences 127, pages 39-43.
Crossref
Crossref
Anna Brown & Albert Maydeu‐Olivares. 2018. The Wiley Handbook of Psychometric Testing. The Wiley Handbook of Psychometric Testing
523
569
.
Philseok Lee, Sunhee Lee & Stephen Stark. (2018) Examining validity evidence for multidimensional forced choice measures with different scoring approaches. Personality and Individual Differences 123, pages 229-235.
Crossref
Crossref
Eunike Wetzel & Samuel Greiff. (2018) The World Beyond Rating Scales. European Journal of Psychological Assessment 34:1, pages 1-5.
Crossref
Crossref
María Elena Oliveri, René Lawless & Hillary Molloy. (2017) A Literature Review on Collaborative Problem Solving for College and Workforce Readiness. ETS Research Report Series 2017:1, pages 1-27.
Crossref
Crossref
Chet Robie, Stephen D. Risavy, Djurre Holtrop & Marise Ph. Born. (2017) Fully contextualized, frequency-based personality measurement: A replication and extension. Journal of Research in Personality 70, pages 56-65.
Crossref
Crossref
Josef Merk, Wolff Schlotz & Thomas Falter. (2017) The Motivational Value Systems Questionnaire (MVSQ): Psychometric Analysis Using a Forced Choice Thurstonian IRT Model. Frontiers in Psychology 8.
Crossref
Crossref
Thomas A. O'Neill, Rhys J. Lewis, Stephanie J. Law, Nicole Larson, Samantha Hancock, Jelena Radan, Naomi Lee & Julie J. Carswell. (2017) Forced-choice pre-employment personality assessment: Construct validity and resistance to faking. Personality and Individual Differences 115, pages 120-127.
Crossref
Crossref
Dave Bartram & Nancy Tippins. 2017. The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of the Psychology of Recruitment, Selection and Employee Retention. The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of the Psychology of Recruitment, Selection and Employee Retention
271
292
.
Yin Lin & Anna Brown. (2016) Influence of Context on Item Parameters in Forced-Choice Personality Assessments. Educational and Psychological Measurement 77:3, pages 389-414.
Crossref
Crossref
Cornelius J. König, Larissa A. Steiner Thommen, Anne-Marie Wittwer & Martin Kleinmann. (2017) Are observer ratings of applicants’ personality also faked? Yes, but less than self-reports. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 25:2, pages 183-192.
Crossref
Crossref
Yue Xiao, Hongyun Liu & Hui Li. (2017) Integration of the Forced-Choice Questionnaire and the Likert Scale: A Simulation Study. Frontiers in Psychology 8.
Crossref
Crossref
A. Susan M. Niessen & Rob R. Meijer. (2017) On the Use of Broadened Admission Criteria in Higher Education. Perspectives on Psychological Science 12:3, pages 436-448.
Crossref
Crossref
Jesús F. Salgado. (2017) Moderator effects of job complexity on the validity of forced-choice personality inventories for predicting job performance. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones 33:3, pages 229-239.
Crossref
Crossref
Neil M.A. Hauenstein, Kevin M. Bradley, Patrick Gavan O’Shea, Yashna J. Shah & Douglas P. Magill. (2017) Interactions between motivation to fake and personality item characteristics: Clarifying the process. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 138, pages 74-92.
Crossref
Crossref
Janek Musek. 2017. The General Factor of Personality. The General Factor of Personality
107
123
.
Richard L. Griffith, Leah Wolfeld, Brigitte K. Armon, Joseph Rios & Ou Lydia Liu. (2016) Assessing Intercultural Competence in Higher Education: Existing Research and Future Directions. ETS Research Report Series 2016:2, pages 1-44.
Crossref
Crossref
Daniel Morillo, Iwin Leenen, Francisco J. Abad, Pedro Hontangas, Jimmy de la Torre & Vicente Ponsoda. (2016) A Dominance Variant Under the Multi-Unidimensional Pairwise-Preference Framework. Applied Psychological Measurement 40:7, pages 500-516.
Crossref
Crossref
Richard D. Goffin & Taylor M. Spring. (2016) Is the Perceived Ability to Deceive confounded by General Mental Ability?. Personality and Individual Differences 101, pages 356-359.
Crossref
Crossref
Eline Van Geert, Altan Orhon, Iulia A. Cioca, Rui Mamede, Slobodan Golušin, Barbora Hubená & Daniel Morillo. (2016) Study Protocol on Intentional Distortion in Personality Assessment: Relationship with Test Format, Culture, and Cognitive Ability. Frontiers in Psychology 7.
Crossref
Crossref
Alan J. Tomassetti, Reeshad S. Dalal & Seth A. Kaplan. (2016) Is Policy Capturing Really More Resistant Than Traditional Self-Report Techniques to Socially Desirable Responding?. Organizational Research Methods 19:2, pages 255-285.
Crossref
Crossref
Anna Brown. (2014) Item Response Models for Forced-Choice Questionnaires: A Common Framework. Psychometrika 81:1, pages 135-160.
Crossref
Crossref
David J Finch, Melanie Peacock, Nadege Levallet & William Foster. (2016) A dynamic capabilities view of employability. Education + Training 58:1, pages 61-81.
Crossref
Crossref
Jesús F. Salgado, Neil Anderson & Gabriel Tauriz. (2015) The validity of ipsative and quasi-ipsative forced-choice personality inventories for different occupational groups: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 88:4, pages 797-834.
Crossref
Crossref
Judith Torney-Purta, Julio C. Cabrera, Katrina Crotts Roohr, Ou Lydia Liu & Joseph A. Rios. (2015) Assessing Civic Competency and Engagement in Higher Education: Research Background, Frameworks, and Directions for Next-Generation Assessment. ETS Research Report Series 2015:2, pages 1-48.
Crossref
Crossref
Pedro M. Hontangas, Jimmy de la Torre, Vicente Ponsoda, Iwin Leenen, Daniel Morillo & Francisco J. Abad. (2015) Comparing Traditional and IRT Scoring of Forced-Choice Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement 39:8, pages 598-612.
Crossref
Crossref
Gary N. Burns, Jenna N. Filipkowski, Megan B. Morris & Elizabeth A. Shoda. (2015) Impact of electronic warnings on online personality scores and test-taker reactions in an applicant simulation. Computers in Human Behavior 48, pages 163-172.
Crossref
Crossref
S. K. Barber, N. Houghton & R. J. Spencer. (2014) Limitations of a method used for adolescent assessment of smile aesthetics. The European Journal of Orthodontics 37:2, pages 135-141.
Crossref
Crossref
Tina Joubert, Ilke Inceoglu, Dave Bartram, Kim Dowdeswell & Yin Lin. (2015) A Comparison of the Psychometric Properties of the Forced Choice and Likert Scale Versions of a Personality Instrument. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 23:1, pages 92-97.
Crossref
Crossref
Frans M. van Eijnatten, L. Andries van der Ark & Sjaña S. Holloway. (2014) Ipsative measurement and the analysis of organizational values: an alternative approach for data analysis. Quality & Quantity 49:2, pages 559-579.
Crossref
Crossref
Anna Brown. 2015. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences
840
848
.
Markus Bühner. 2015. Auswahl von Männern und Frauen als Führungskräfte. Auswahl von Männern und Frauen als Führungskräfte
17
31
.
John E.G. Bateson, Jochen Wirtz, Eugene Burke & Carly Vaughan. (2014) Psychometric sifting to efficiently select the right service employees. Managing Service Quality 24:5, pages 418-433.
Crossref
Crossref
Jennica R. WebsterTerry A. Beehr. (2012) Antecedents and outcomes of employee perceptions of intra‐organizational mobility channels. Journal of Organizational Behavior 34:7, pages 919-941.
Crossref
Crossref
Paul Irwing. (2013) The general factor of personality: Substance or artefact?. Personality and Individual Differences 55:3, pages 234-242.
Crossref
Crossref
Chad Seifried. (2013) The Forced-Choice Certainty Method: A Review of an Underutilized Survey Approach. Kinesiology Review 2:2, pages 130-141.
Crossref
Crossref
Courtney L. Holladay, Emily David & Stefanie K. Johnson. (2013) Retesting Personality in Employee Selection: Implications of the Context, Sample, and Setting. Psychological Reports 112:2, pages 486-501.
Crossref
Crossref
Philip Bobko & Philip L. Roth. (2012) Reviewing, Categorizing, and Analyzing the Literature on Black–White Mean Differences for Predictors of Job Performance: Verifying Some perceptions and Updating/Correcting Others. Personnel Psychology 66:1, pages 91-126.
Crossref
Crossref
Dave Bartram. (2011) Scalar Equivalence of OPQ32. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 44:1, pages 61-83.
Crossref
Crossref
D. Betsy McCoach, Robert K. Gable & John P. MaduraD. Betsy McCoach, Robert K. Gable & John P. Madura. 2013. Instrument Development in the Affective Domain. Instrument Development in the Affective Domain
33
90
.
Anna Brown & Alberto Maydeu-Olivares. (2012) Fitting a Thurstonian IRT model to forced-choice data using Mplus. Behavior Research Methods 44:4, pages 1135-1147.
Crossref
Crossref
Cornelius J. König, Ann-Sibill Merz & Nicoletta Trauffer. (2012) What is in Applicants' Minds When They Fill Out a Personality Test? Insights from a qualitative study. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 20:4, pages 442-452.
Crossref
Crossref
ANNE JANSEN, CORNELIUS J. KöNIG, MARTIN KLEINMANN & KLAUS G. MELCHERS. (2012)
The Interactive Effect of Impression Motivation and Cognitive Schema on Self‐Presentation in a Personality Inventory
1
. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 42:8, pages 1932-1957.
Crossref
Crossref
Stephen Stark, Oleksandr S. Chernyshenko, Fritz Drasgow & Leonard A. White. (2012) Adaptive Testing With Multidimensional Pairwise Preference Items. Organizational Research Methods 15:3, pages 463-487.
Crossref
Crossref
JULIA LEVASHINA, FREDERICK P. MORGESON & MICHAEL A. CAMPION. (2012) TELL ME SOME MORE: EXPLORING HOW VERBAL ABILITY AND ITEM VERIFIABILITY INFLUENCE RESPONSES TO BIODATA QUESTIONS IN A HIGH‐STAKES SELECTION CONTEXT. Personnel Psychology 65:2, pages 359-383.
Crossref
Crossref
Murray R. Barrick & Michael K. Mount. 2012. The Oxford Handbook of Personnel Assessment and Selection. The Oxford Handbook of Personnel Assessment and Selection
225
251
.
Robert P. Tett, Kurt A. Freund, Neil D. Christiansen, Kevin E. Fox & John Coaster. (2012) Faking on self-report emotional intelligence and personality tests: Effects of faking opportunity, cognitive ability, and job type. Personality and Individual Differences 52:2, pages 195-201.
Crossref
Crossref
Gary N. Burns & Neil D. Christiansen. (2011) Self‐efficacy in the Workplace: Linking personality to domain‐specific efficacy beliefs. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 19:4, pages 429-434.
Crossref
Crossref
Richard D. Goffin, Isaac Jang & Erica Skinner. (2011) Forced-choice and conventional personality assessment: Each may have unique value in pre-employment testing. Personality and Individual Differences 51:7, pages 840-844.
Crossref
Crossref
Thomas A. O’Neill, Rhys J. Lewis & Julie J. Carswell. (2011) Employee personality, justice perceptions, and the prediction of workplace deviance. Personality and Individual Differences 51:5, pages 595-600.
Crossref
Crossref
Winfred ArthurJr.Jr. & Ryan M. Glaze. 2011. Technology‐Enhanced Assessment of Talent. Technology‐Enhanced Assessment of Talent
99
152
.
Rick Hense & Jay Janovics. 2011. Technology‐Enhanced Assessment of Talent. Technology‐Enhanced Assessment of Talent
324
337
.
Fritz Drasgow, Oleksandr S. Chernyshenko & Stephen Stark. (2015) 75 Years After Likert: Thurstone Was Right!. Industrial and Organizational Psychology 3:4, pages 465-476.
Crossref
Crossref
Neil D. Christiansen, Jay E. Janovics & Brian P. Siers. (2010) Emotional Intelligence in Selection Contexts: Measurement method, criterion‐related validity, and vulnerability to response distortion. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 18:1, pages 87-101.
Crossref
Crossref
C. Harry Hui, S. Tess Pak & Kevin H. C. Cheng. (2009) Validation Studies on a Measure of Overall Managerial Readiness for the Chinese. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 17:2, pages 127-141.
Crossref
Crossref
Patrick D. Converse, Mitchell H. Peterson & Richard L. Griffith. (2009) Faking on Personality Measures: Implications for selection involving multiple predictors. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 17:1, pages 47-60.
Crossref
Crossref
Filip Lievens & Helga Peeters. (2008) Impact of Elaboration on Responding to Situational Judgment Test Items. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 16:4, pages 345-355.
Crossref
Crossref
Jacob B. Hirsh & Jordan B. Peterson. (2008) Predicting creativity and academic success with a “Fake-Proof” measure of the Big Five. Journal of Research in Personality 42:5, pages 1323-1333.
Crossref
Crossref
Patrick D. Converse, Frederick L. Oswald, Anna Imus, Cynthia Hedricks, Radha Roy & Hilary Butera. (2008) Comparing Personality Test Formats and Warnings: Effects on criterion-related validity and test-taker reactions. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 16:2, pages 155-169.
Crossref
Crossref
DENIZ S. ONES, STEPHAN DILCHERT, CHOCKALINGAM VISWESVARAN & TIMOTHY A. JUDGE. (2007) IN SUPPORT OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT IN ORGANIZATIONAL SETTINGS. Personnel Psychology 60:4, pages 995-1027.
Crossref
Crossref
ROBERT P. TETT & NEIL D. CHRISTIANSEN. (2007) PERSONALITY TESTS AT THE CROSSROADS: A RESPONSE TO MORGESON, CAMPION, DIPBOYE, HOLLENBECK, MURPHY, AND SCHMITT (2007). Personnel Psychology 60:4, pages 967-993.
Crossref
Crossref
Ilke InceogluDave Bartram. (2007) Die Validität von Persönlichkeitsfragebögen. Zeitschrift für Personalpsychologie 6:4, pages 160-173.
Crossref
Crossref
Chet Robie, Douglas J. Brown & James C. Beaty. (2007) Do people fake on personality inventories? A verbal protocol analysis. Journal of Business and Psychology 21:4, pages 489-509.
Crossref
Crossref
Chet Robie, Kathleen A. Tuzinski & Paul R. Bly. (2006) A survey of assessor beliefs and practices related to faking. Journal of Managerial Psychology 21:7, pages 669-681.
Crossref
Crossref
Mitchell G. Rothstein & Richard D. Goffin. (2006) The use of personality measures in personnel selection: What does current research support?. Human Resource Management Review 16:2, pages 155-180.
Crossref
Crossref
Chet Robie. (2006) EFFECTS OF PERCEIVED SELECTION RATIO ON PERSONALITY TEST FAKING. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal 34:10, pages 1233-1244.
Crossref
Crossref