Citations (14)
Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.
Read on this site (1)
Walter P. Vispoel. (2000) Computerized Versus Paper-and-Pencil Assessment of Self-Concept: Score Comparability and Respondent Preferences. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development 33:3, pages 130-143.
Read now
Read now
Articles from other publishers (13)
Mon-hsin Wang Flahive, Ying-Chih ChuangChien-Mo Li. (2010) Reliability and Validity Evidence of the Chinese Piers-Harris Children’s Self-Concept Scale Scores Among Taiwanese Children. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment 29:3, pages 273-285.
Crossref
Crossref
Christopher A. Flessner, Jeffrey Sapyta, Abbe Garcia, Jennifer B. Freeman, Martin E. Franklin, Edna Foa & John March. (2010) Examining the Psychometric Properties of the Family Accommodation Scale-Parent-Report (FAS-PR). Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment 33:1, pages 38-46.
Crossref
Crossref
Michael Berger. (2006) Computer Assisted Clinical Assessment. Child and Adolescent Mental Health 11:2, pages 64-75.
Crossref
Crossref
Diana Echeverria, Nicholas J. Heyer, Alvan C. BittnerJr.Jr., Diane Rohlman & James S. Woods. (2016) Test-Retest Reliability and Factor Stability of the Behavioral Evaluation for Epidemiology Studies Test Battery. Perceptual and Motor Skills 95:3, pages 845-867.
Crossref
Crossref
Richard V. Bressani & A.Chris Downs. (2002) Youth independent living assessment: testing the equivalence of web and paper/pencil versions of the Ansell–Casey Life Skills Assessment. Computers in Human Behavior 18:4, pages 453-464.
Crossref
Crossref
Barbara M. Byrne. (2002) Validating the measurement and structure of self-concept: Snapshots of past, present, and future research.. American Psychologist 57:11, pages 897-909.
Crossref
Crossref
Walter P. Vispoel, Jaeyool Boo & Timothy Bleiler. (2016) Computerized and Paper-and-Pencil Versions of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: A Comparison of Psychometric Features and Respondent Preferences. Educational and Psychological Measurement 61:3, pages 461-474.
Crossref
Crossref
Armand De Clercq, Annemie Desoete & Herbert Roeyers. (2000) Epa2000: A multilingual, programmable computer assessment of off-line metacognition in children with mathematical-learning disabilities. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 32:2, pages 304-311.
Crossref
Crossref
Stefan E. Schulenberg & Barbara A. Yutrzenka. (1999) The equivalence of computerized and paper-and-pencil psychological instruments: Implications for measures of negative affect. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 31:2, pages 315-321.
Crossref
Crossref
Keith A. Campbell, Diane S. Rohlman, Daniel Storzbach, Laurence M. Binder, W. Kent Anger, Craig A. Kovera, Kelly L. Davis & Sandra J. Grossmann. (2016) Test-Retest Reliability of Psychological and Neurobehavioral Tests Self-Administered by Computer. Assessment 6:1, pages 21-32.
Crossref
Crossref
David L. DiLalla. (2016) Computerized Administration of the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire. Assessment 3:4, pages 365-374.
Crossref
Crossref
Craig A. Kovera, W.Kent Anger, Keith A. Campbell, Laurence M. Binder, Daniel Storzbach, Kelly L. Davis & Diane S. Rohlman. (1996) Computer-administration of questionnaires: A Health Screening System (HSS) developed for veterans. Neurotoxicology and Teratology 18:4, pages 511-518.
Crossref
Crossref
B.Douglas Ford, Romeo Vitelli & Noreen Stuckless. (1996) The effects of computer versus paper-and-pencil administration on measures of anger and revenge with an inmate population. Computers in Human Behavior 12:1, pages 159-166.
Crossref
Crossref