Citations (34)
Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.
Read on this site (2)
John A. Barnden, Stephen Helmreich, Eric Iverson & Gees C. Stein. (1996) Artificial Intelligence and Metaphors of Mind: Within-Vehicle Reasoning and Its Benefits. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 11:2, pages 101-123.
Read now
Read now
JOHNA. BARNDEN. (1989) Towards a paradigm shift in belief representation methodology. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 1:2, pages 133-161.
Read now
Read now
Articles from other publishers (32)
Robert Witcher. (2022) Editorial. Antiquity 96:386, pages 271-279.
Crossref
Crossref
Cristián Simonetti. (2015) The stratification of time. Time & Society 24:2, pages 139-162.
Crossref
Crossref
Asher Koriat & Morris Goldsmith. (2010) The correspondence metaphor of memory: Right, wrong, or useful?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2, pages 211-228.
Crossref
Crossref
Daniel B. Wright. (2010) Hypothesis testing in experimental and naturalistic memory research. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2, pages 210-211.
Crossref
Crossref
Eugene Winograd. (2010) Contexts and functions of retrieval. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2, pages 209-210.
Crossref
Crossref
K. Geoffrey White. (2010) Direct remembering and the correspondence metaphor. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2, pages 208-209.
Crossref
Crossref
Jocelyn Penny Small. (2010) Classical antecedents for modern metaphors for memory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2, pages 208-208.
Crossref
Crossref
Bennett L. Schwartz. (2010) Amnesia and metamemory demonstrate the importance of both metaphors. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2, pages 207-207.
Crossref
Crossref
David C. Palmer. (2010) Operationaling “correspondence”. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2, pages 206-207.
Crossref
Crossref
Ian R. Newby & Michael Ross. (2010) Beyond the correspondence metaphor: When accuracy cannot be assessed. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2, pages 205-206.
Crossref
Crossref
Thomas O. Nelson. (2010) Metacognition, metaphors, and the measurement of human memory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2, pages 204-205.
Crossref
Crossref
Ulric Neisser. (2010) Remembering as doing. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2, pages 203-204.
Crossref
Crossref
Timothy P. McNamara. (2010) False dichotomies and dead metaphors. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2, pages 203-203.
Crossref
Crossref
Giuliana Mazzoni. (2010) The phenomenal object of memory and control processes. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2, pages 202-203.
Crossref
Crossref
Andrew R. Mayes, Rob van Eijk & Patricia L. Gooding. (2010) Accuracy and quantity are poor measures of recall and recognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2, pages 201-202.
Crossref
Crossref
Steen F. Larsen. (2010) Correspondence to the past: The essence of the archaeology metaphor. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2, pages 200-201.
Crossref
Crossref
Lia Kvavilashvili & Judi Ellis. (2010) Let's forget the everyday/laboratory controversy. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2, pages 199-200.
Crossref
Crossref
Arie W. Kruglanski. (2010) The storehouse/correspondence partition in memory research: Promises and perils. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2, pages 198-199.
Crossref
Crossref
Keith S. Karn & Gregory J. Zelinsky. (2010) Driving and dish-washing: Failure of the correspondence metaphor for memory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2, pages 198-198.
Crossref
Crossref
Ronald P. Fisher. (2010) Implications of output-bound measures for laboratory and field research in memory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2, pages 197-197.
Crossref
Crossref
Howard Eichenbaum. (2010) The real-life/laboratory controversy as viewed from the cognitive neurobiology of animal learning and memory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2, pages 196-197.
Crossref
Crossref
Martin A. Conway. (2010) What do memories correspond to?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2, pages 195-196.
Crossref
Crossref
Darryl Bruce. (2010) The correspondence metaphor: Prescriptive or descriptive?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2, pages 194-195.
Crossref
Crossref
Robert A. Bjork & Thomas D. Wickens. (2010) Memory, metamemory, and conditional statistics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2, pages 193-194.
Crossref
Crossref
Aaron Ben-Ze'ev. (2010) The alternative to the storehouse metaphor. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2, pages 192-193.
Crossref
Crossref
Ian Maynard Begg. (2010) On correspondence, accuracy, and truth. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2, pages 191-192.
Crossref
Crossref
Harry P. Bahrick. (2010) The relation between reproductive and reconstructive processing of memory content. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2, pages 191-191.
Crossref
Crossref
Norman H. Anderson. (2010) Functional memory requires a quite different value metaphor. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2, pages 190-191.
Crossref
Crossref
Richard Alterman. (2010) Everyday memory and activity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2, pages 189-190.
Crossref
Crossref
Daniel Algom. (2010) Correspondence conception of memory: A good match is hard to find. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2, pages 188-189.
Crossref
Crossref
Asher Koriat & Morris Goldsmith. (2010) Memory metaphors and the real-life/laboratory controversy: Correspondence versus storehouse conceptions of memory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2, pages 167-188.
Crossref
Crossref
John A. Barnden. (2007) BELIEF IN METAPHOR: TAKING COMMONSENSE PSYCHOLOGY SERIOUSLY1. Computational Intelligence 8:3, pages 520-552.
Crossref
Crossref