Search in:

International Journal of Women's Health Volume 9, 2017 - Issue

Submit an article Journal homepage

Open access

239

Views

CrossRef citations to date

Altmetric

Original Research

Patient comfort from the technologist perspective: factors to consider in mammographic imaging

Christina C Mendat1 Human Factors MD, Charlotte, NC

Dave Mislan2 Hologic Inc., Marlborough, MA, USACorrespondence[email protected]

Lisa Hession-Kunz2 Hologic Inc., Marlborough, MA, USA

Pages 359-364 | Published online: 18 May 2017

Cite this article
CrossMark

Full Article
Figures & data
References
Citations
Metrics
Licensing
Reprints & Permissions
View PDF PDF

Citations (12)

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Subscribe to citation updates

Articles from other publishers (12)

Madeleine Hertel, Resam Makvandi, Steffen Kappler, Ralf Nanke, Petra Bildhauer, Sylvia Saalfeld, Marcus Radicke, Daniel Juhre & Georg Rose. (2023) Towards a biomechanical breast model to simulate and investigate breast compression and its effects in mammography and tomosynthesis. Physics in Medicine & Biology 68:8, pages 085007.
Crossref

Madeleine Hertel, Chang Liu, Haobo Song, Michael Golatta, Steffen Kappler, Ralf Nanke, Marcus Radicke, Andreas Maier & Georg Rose. (2023) Clinical prototype implementation enabling an improved day-to-day mammography compression. Physica Medica 106, pages 102524.
Crossref

Susana I. S. Patuleia, Cathy B. Moelans, Jasmijn Koopman, Julia E. C. van Steenhoven, Thijs van Dalen, Carmen C. van der Pol, Agnes Jager, Margreet G. E. M. Ausems, Paul J. van Diest, Elsken van der Wall & Karijn P. M. Suijkerbuijk. (2022) Patient-centered research: how do women tolerate nipple fluid aspiration as a potential screening tool for breast cancer?. BMC Cancer 22:1.
Crossref

Siobhan Rigby Oca, Amy Strong, Jiselle Havas, Daniel M. Buckland & Leila J. Bridgeman. (2022) Development and Testing of a Durable and Novel Breast Phantom for Robotic Autonomous Ultrasound Systems. Journal of Medical Robotics Research 07:04.
Crossref

Valentina Iotti, Paolo Giorgi Rossi, Laura Canovi, Monica Guberti, Andrea Nitrosi, Davide Giosuè Lippolis, Vanessa Marchesi, Giulia Besutti, Marta Ottone, Rita Vacondio & Pierpaolo Pattacini. (2022) Patient-centred care with self-compression mammography in clinical practice: a randomized trial compared to standard compression. European Radiology 33:1, pages 450-460.
Crossref

Yueqiang Zhu, Avice M. O’Connell, Yue Ma, Aidi Liu, Haijie Li, Yuwei Zhang, Xiaohua Zhang & Zhaoxiang Ye. (2021) Dedicated breast CT: state of the art—Part I. Historical evolution and technical aspects. European Radiology 32:3, pages 1579-1589.
Crossref

Marthe Larsen, Nataliia Moshina, Silje Sagstad & Solveig Hofvind. (2020) Factors associated with attendance and attendance patterns in a population-based mammographic screening program. Journal of Medical Screening 28:2, pages 169-176.
Crossref

Haijie Li, Lu Yin, Ni He, Peng Han, Yueqiang Zhu, Yue Ma, Aidi Liu, Hong Lu, Zhipeng Gao, Peifang Liu, Yaopan Wu & Zhaoxiang Ye. (2019) Comparison of comfort between cone beam breast computed tomography and digital mammography. European Journal of Radiology 120, pages 108674.
Crossref

Katherine E. Conlon, Lucy Lester & Sarah M. Friedewald. (2019) Digital Mammography. Advances in Clinical Radiology 1, pages 19-25.
Crossref

John Davis, Juliana Liang, Matthew B. Petterson, Albert T. Roh, Navya Chundu, Paul Kang, Samantha L. Matz, Mary J. Connell & Daniel G. Gridley. (2019) Risk Factors for Late Screening Mammography. Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology 48:1, pages 40-44.
Crossref

Corinne Balleyguier, Morgane Cousin, Ariane Dunant, Marie Attard, Suzette Delaloge & Julia Arfi-Rouche. (2018) Patient-assisted compression helps for image quality reduction dose and improves patient experience in mammography. European Journal of Cancer 103, pages 137-142.
Crossref

Andrew B. Rosenkrantz, Margaret M. Fleming, Linda Moy, James S. Babb & Richard DuszakJrJr. (2018) Screening Mammography Utilization and Medicare Beneficiaries' Perceptions of Their Primary Care Physicians. Academic Radiology 25:4, pages 461-469.
Crossref

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.

People also read
Recommended articles
Cited by

To cite this article:

Reference style: APA Chicago Harvard

Citation copied to clipboard

Reference styles above use APA (6th edition), Chicago (16th edition) & Harvard (10th edition)

Download citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by citation management software including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks and Reference Manager.

Choose format: RIS BibTex RefWorks Direct Export

Choose options: Citation Citation & abstract Citation & references

Patient comfort from the technologist perspective: factors to consider in mammographic imaging

Articles from other publishers (12)

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Your download is now in progress and you may close this window

Login or register to access this feature

Patient comfort from the technologist perspective: factors to consider in mammographic imaging

Citations (12)

Articles from other publishers (12)

Related research

To cite this article:

Download citation

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Keep up to date