Search in:

International Journal of Women's Health Volume 5, 2013 - Issue

Submit an article Journal homepage

Open access

144

Views

CrossRef citations to date

Altmetric

Short Report

Does social disadvantage affect the validity of self-report for cervical cancer screening?

Aisha K Lofters1 Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto;2 Department of Family and Community Medicine, St Michael’s Hospital, Toronto;3 Centre for Research on Inner City Health, The Keenan Research Centre in the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St Michael’s Hospital, TorontoCorrespondence[email protected]

Rahim Moineddin1 Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto;4 Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto;5 Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto

Stephen W Hwang3 Centre for Research on Inner City Health, The Keenan Research Centre in the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St Michael’s Hospital, Toronto;6 Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

Richard H Glazier1 Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto;2 Department of Family and Community Medicine, St Michael’s Hospital, Toronto;3 Centre for Research on Inner City Health, The Keenan Research Centre in the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St Michael’s Hospital, Toronto;4 Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto;5 Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto

Pages 29-33 | Published online: 17 Jan 2013

Cite this article

Full Article
Figures & data
References
Citations
Metrics
Licensing
Reprints & Permissions
View PDF PDF

Citations (18)

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Subscribe to citation updates

Articles from other publishers (18)

Robin T. Higashi, Jasmin A. Tiro, Rachel L. Winer, India J. Ornelas, Perla Bravo, Lisa Quirk & Larry G. Kessler. (2023) Understanding the effect of new U.S. cervical cancer screening guidelines and modalities on patients’ comprehension and reporting of their cervical cancer screening behavior. Preventive Medicine Reports 32, pages 102169.
Crossref

Elisheva R. DananJulian BrunnerAlicia BergmanMichele SpoontCatherine ChanfreauIsmelda CaneloErin E. KrebsElizabeth M. Yano. (2022) The Relationship Between Sexual Assault History and Cervical Cancer Screening Completion Among Women Veterans in the Veterans Health Administration. Journal of Women's Health 31:7, pages 1040-1047.
Crossref

Alemnew Destaw, Miresa Midaksa, Adamu Addissie, Eva Johanna Kantelhardt & Muluken Gizaw. (2021) Cervical cancer screening “see and treat approach”: real-life uptake after invitation and associated factors at health facilities in Gondar, Northwest Ethiopia. BMC Cancer 21:1.
Crossref

Jin Qin, Shahram Shahangian, Mona Saraiya, Hunter Holt, Maribeth Gagnon & George F. Sawaya. (2021) Trends in the use of cervical cancer screening tests in a large medical claims database, United States, 2013–2019. Gynecologic Oncology 163:2, pages 378-384.
Crossref

Marianne P. Bitler, Christopher S. Carpenter & Danea Horn. (2021) Effects of the Colorectal Cancer Control Program. Health Economics 30:11, pages 2667-2685.
Crossref

Ezequiel Aranda, Jeanna-eve Franck, Virginie Ringa, Jeanne Sassenou, Mireille Coeuret-Pellicer, Laurent Rigal & Gwenn Menvielle. (2021) Social inequalities in participation in cancer screening: does the mode of data collection matter? The CONSTANCES cohort. European Journal of Public Health 31:3, pages 602-608.
Crossref

Finaba Berete, Johan Van der Heyden, Stefaan Demarest, Rana Charafeddine, Jean Tafforeau, Herman Van Oyen, Olivier Bruyère & Françoise Renard. (2021) Validity of self-reported mammography uptake in the Belgian health interview survey: selection and reporting bias. European Journal of Public Health 31:1, pages 214-220.
Crossref

Chun R. Chao, Lanfang Xu & Neal M. Lonky. (2019) Adherence to Cervical Cancer Screening Guidelines Among Women Aged 66–68 Years in a Large Community-Based Practice. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 57:6, pages 757-764.
Crossref

Cyrielle Crampe-Casnabet, Jeanna-eve Franck, Virginie Ringa, Mireille Coeuret-Pellicer, Pierre Chauvin & Gwenn Menvielle. (2019) Role of obesity in differences in cervical cancer screening rates by migration history. The CONSTANCES survey. Cancer Epidemiology 58, pages 98-103.
Crossref

Aisha K Lofters, Deanna Telner, Sumeet Kalia & Morgan Slater. (2018) Association Between Adherence to Cancer Screening and Knowledge of Screening Guidelines: Feasibility Study Linking Self-Reported Survey Data With Medical Records. JMIR Cancer 4:2, pages e10529.
Crossref

Ramin Asgary. (2018) Cancer screening in the homeless population. The Lancet Oncology 19:7, pages e344-e350.
Crossref

Geetanjali D. Datta, Alexandra Blair, Marie-Pierre Sylvestre, Lise Gauvin, Mylene Drouin & Marie-Helene Mayrand. (2018) Cervical cancer screening in Montreal: Building evidence to support primary care and policy interventions. Preventive Medicine 111, pages 265-271.
Crossref

Meg Watson, Vicki Benard & Elaine W. Flagg. (2018) Assessment of trends in cervical cancer screening rates using healthcare claims data: United States, 2003–2014. Preventive Medicine Reports 9, pages 124-130.
Crossref

Emily He, Jie-Bin Lew, Sam Egger, Emily Banks, Robyn L. Ward, Valerie Beral & Karen Canfell. (2018) Factors associated with participation in colorectal cancer screening in Australia: Results from the 45 and Up Study cohort. Preventive Medicine 106, pages 185-193.
Crossref

Ramin Asgary, Analena Alcabes, Rebecca Feldman, Victoria Garland, Ramesh Naderi, Gbenga Ogedegbe & Blanca Sckell. (2015) Cervical Cancer Screening Among Homeless Women of New York City Shelters. Maternal and Child Health Journal 20:6, pages 1143-1150.
Crossref

Ramin Asgary, Analena Alcabes, Rebecca Feldman, Victoria Garland, Ramesh Naderi, Gbenga Ogedegbe & Blanca Sckell. (2015) Human Papillomavirus Knowledge and Attitude among Homeless Women of New York City Shelters. Women's Health Issues 25:6, pages 727-731.
Crossref

Silvia Bermedo-Carrasco, Juan Nicolás Peña-Sánchez, Rein Lepnurm, Michael Szafron & Cheryl Waldner. (2015) Inequities in cervical cancer screening among Colombian women: A multilevel analysis of a nationwide survey. Cancer Epidemiology 39:2, pages 229-236.
Crossref

Olveen Carrasquillo, Sheila McCann, Antony Amofah, Larry Pierre, Brendaly Rodriguez, Yisel Alonzo, Kumar Ilangovan, Martha Gonzalez, Dinah Trevil, Margaret M Byrne, Tulay Koru-Sengul & Erin Kobetz. (2014) Rationale and design of the research project of the South Florida Center for the Reduction of Cancer Health Disparities (SUCCESS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 15:1.
Crossref

Share icon
Back to Top

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.

People also read
Recommended articles
Cited by

To cite this article:

Reference style: APA Chicago Harvard

Citation copied to clipboard

Reference styles above use APA (6th edition), Chicago (16th edition) & Harvard (10th edition)

Download citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by citation management software including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks and Reference Manager.

Choose format: RIS BibTex RefWorks Direct Export

Choose options: Citation Citation & abstract Citation & references

Does social disadvantage affect the validity of self-report for cervical cancer screening?

Articles from other publishers (18)

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Your download is now in progress and you may close this window

Login or register to access this feature

Does social disadvantage affect the validity of self-report for cervical cancer screening?

Citations (18)

Articles from other publishers (18)

Related research

To cite this article:

Download citation

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Keep up to date