368
Views
22
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research articles

Learner Metalinguistic Reflections Following Output-oriented and Reflective Activities

&
Pages 131-146 | Published online: 05 Jan 2009

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (3)

Sasan Baleghizadeh & Fatemeh Arab. (2011) Comparing native models and peer feedback in promoting noticing through written output. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 5:1, pages 63-79.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (19)

C. Cecilia Tocaimaza-Hatch & Jonathan Santo. (2020) Social interaction in the Spanish classroom: How proficiency and linguistic background impact vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research 27:5, pages 1142-1166.
Crossref
Yoon-Kyoung Kim & Tae-Young Kim. (2021) Motivational languaging intervention for L2 learners: The differential effect of individual and group writing. Language Teaching Research, pages 136216882110114.
Crossref
Rosa M. Manchón, Florentina Nicolás-Conesa, Lourdes Cerezo & Raquel Criado. 2020. Languaging in Language Learning and Teaching. Languaging in Language Learning and Teaching 242 265 .
Kevin López. (2020) Impact of Pushed Output on Students' Oral Production. GIST – Education and Learning Research Journal 20, pages 85-108.
Crossref
Véronique Fortier, Philippa Bell, Valérie Perron & Isabelle Gauvin. (2019) Réflexions métalinguistiques et correction d’erreurs en anglais langue seconde : étude des types de réflexions et relation avec l’exactitude des corrections. The Canadian Modern Language Review 75:1, pages 3-22.
Crossref
Masako Ishikawa & Wataru Suzuki. (2016) The effect of written languaging on learning the hypothetical conditional in English. System 58, pages 97-111.
Crossref
Debra Myhill & Ruth Newman. (2016) Metatalk: Enabling metalinguistic discussion about writing. International Journal of Educational Research 80, pages 177-187.
Crossref
María Basterrechea. (2015) Pushed output in a multi-stage dictogloss task. ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 166:2, pages 307-329.
Crossref
Heike Neumann & Kim McDonough. (2015) Exploring student interaction during collaborative prewriting discussions and its relationship to L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 27, pages 84-104.
Crossref
Mª Teresa Cáceres-Lorenzo. (2014) Variables en el desarrollo de la reflexión metalingüística (L1) de alumnos plurilingües en el primer año universitario. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 27:2, pages 275-296.
Crossref
Zia Tajeddin & Maryam Pezeshki. (2014) Acquisition of Politeness Markers in an EFL Context: Impact of Input Enhancement and Output Tasks. RELC Journal 45:3, pages 269-286.
Crossref
Heidi Byrnes & Rosa M. Manchón. 2014. Task-Based Language Learning – Insights from and for L2 Writing. Task-Based Language Learning – Insights from and for L2 Writing 1 23 .
Giuliana Dettori & Valentina Lupi. 2013. International Handbook of Metacognition and Learning Technologies. International Handbook of Metacognition and Learning Technologies 615 625 .
Wataru Suzuki. (2012) Written Languaging, Direct Correction, and Second Language Writing Revision. Language Learning 62:4, pages 1110-1133.
Crossref
Gillian Wigglesworth & Neomy Storch. (2012) What role for collaboration in writing and writing feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing 21:4, pages 364-374.
Crossref
Shirin Abadikhah. (2012) The effect of mechanical and meaningful production of output on learning English relative clauses. System 40:1, pages 129-143.
Crossref
YouJin KimKim McDonough. (2011) Using pretask modelling to encourage collaborative learning opportunities. Language Teaching Research 15:2, pages 183-199.
Crossref
Peter A. Shaw. (2009) The Syllabus is Dead, Long Live the Syllabus: Thoughts on the State of Language Curriculum, Content, Language, Tasks, Projects, Materials, Wikis, Blogs and the World Wide Web. Language and Linguistics Compass 3:5, pages 1266-1283.
Crossref
Wataru Suzuki & Nobuya Itagaki. (2009) Languaging in grammar exercises by Japanese EFL learners of differing proficiency. System 37:2, pages 217-225.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.