3,370
Views
18
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The UK Clinical Aptitude Test: Is it a fair test for selecting medical students?

, &
Pages e557-e565 | Published online: 29 May 2012

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (1)

Sarah McElwee, Kevin Y.F. Cheung, Stephen R.T. Cromie, Mark Shannon & Tom Gallacher. (2021) Revising the BioMedical Admissions Test (BMAT) to improve impact and washback for candidates and support fair access to test preparation. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 28:1, pages 77-95.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (17)

Daniel Weppert, Dorothee Amelung, Malvin Escher, Leander Troll, Martina Kadmon, Lena Listunova & Jana Montasser. (2023) The impact of preparatory activities on the largest clinical aptitude test for prospective medical students in Germany. Frontiers in Education 8.
Crossref
S. Fikrat-Wevers, W. E. De Leng, W. W. Van Den Broek, A. M. Woltman & K. M. Stegers-Jager. (2023) The added value of free preparatory activities for widening access to medical education: a multi-cohort study. BMC Medical Education 23:1.
Crossref
Michal M. Kawecki & Philip M. Newton. (2023) Widening Access: what do dental school websites signal to prospective students?. British Dental Journal 234:2, pages 106-110.
Crossref
Sanat Kulkarni, Jayne Parry & Alice Sitch. (2022) An assessment of the impact of formal preparation activities on performance in the University Clinical Aptitude Test (UCAT): a national study. BMC Medical Education 22:1.
Crossref
Alessandra J. Booth, Katharine J. Hurry & Stefan Abela. (2022) The current dental school applicant: an overview of the admission process for UK dental schools and the sociodemographic status of applicants. British Dental Journal 232:3, pages 172-176.
Crossref
Barbara Griffin, Graeme L Horton, Lisa Lampe, Boaz Shulruf & Wendy Hu. (2020) The change from UMAT to UCAT for undergraduate medical school applicants: impact on selection outcomes. Medical Journal of Australia 214:2, pages 84-89.
Crossref
Jonathan Foo, George Rivers, Louise Allen, Dragan Ilic, Stephen Maloney & Margaret Hay. (2020) The economic costs of selecting medical students: An Australian case study. Medical Education 54:7, pages 643-651.
Crossref
M. E. Kelly, F. Patterson, S. O’Flynn, J. Mulligan & A. W. Murphy. (2018) A systematic review of stakeholder views of selection methods for medical schools admission. BMC Medical Education 18:1.
Crossref
L. Zibarras, F. Patterson & R. Driver. (2018) A future research agenda for selection into healthcare. European Journal of Dental Education 22:2, pages e300-e302.
Crossref
Barbara Griffin. 2018. Selection and Recruitment in the Healthcare Professions. Selection and Recruitment in the Healthcare Professions 223 248 .
Maureen E. Kelly & Siun O’Flynn. (2016) The construct validity of HPAT-Ireland for the selection of medical students: unresolved issues and future research implications. Advances in Health Sciences Education 22:2, pages 267-286.
Crossref
Jonathan Mathers, Alice Sitch & Jayne Parry. (2016) Longitudinal assessment of the impact of the use of the UK clinical aptitude test for medical student selection. Medical Education 50:10, pages 1033-1044.
Crossref
Jonathan Mathers, Alice Sitch & Jayne Parry. (2016) Population-based longitudinal analyses of offer likelihood in UK medical schools: 1996-2012. Medical Education 50:6, pages 612-623.
Crossref
Fiona Patterson, Alec Knight, Jon Dowell, Sandra Nicholson, Fran Cousans & Jennifer Cleland. (2016) How effective are selection methods in medical education? A systematic review. Medical Education 50:1, pages 36-60.
Crossref
Benjamin HL Harris, Jason L Walsh & Simon Lammy. (2015) UK medical selection: lottery or meritocracy?. Clinical Medicine 15:1, pages 40-46.
Crossref
Janet Yates & David James. (2013) The UK clinical aptitude test and clinical course performance at Nottingham: a prospective cohort study. BMC Medical Education 13:1.
Crossref
Tom M Wilkinson & Tim J Wilkinson. (2013) Preparation courses for a medical admissions test: effectiveness contrasts with opinion. Medical Education 47:4, pages 417-424.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.