![The World Congress on Controversies in Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility (COGI). Click here to learn more.]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/112382/JournalAd-COGI2024-Leaderboard.jpg"})
Citations (15)
Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.
Read on this site (5)
M. K. Stafford, M. C. Pitman, N. Nanthakumaran, J. R. Smith. (1998) Blunt-tipped versus sharp-tipped needles: wound morbidity. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 18:1, pages 18-19.
Read now
Read now
J. C. ABLETT M. WHITTEN J. R. SMITH. (1998) Do blunt tipped needles reduce the risk of glove puncture and needlestick injury in the suture of episiotomy and perineal repair?. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 18:5, pages 478-479.
Read now
Read now
P. B. Thomas, S. Falder, M. Jolly, N. J. St. G. Saunders & J. R. Smith. (1995) The role of blunt-tipped needles and a new needle-holder in reducing needlestick injury. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 15:5, pages 336-337.
Read now
Read now
G. S. J. Tydeman. (1995) Risks to surgeons: A comparison of blunt and sharp tipped suture needles. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 15:5, pages 333-335.
Read now
Read now
S. Falder, P. Thomas, M. Jolly, G. Iatrakis & J. R. Smith. (1994) Reducing the risk of needlestick injury in surgical practice. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 14:1, pages 56-56.
Read now
Read now
Articles from other publishers (10)
Annika Saarto, Jos H Verbeek, Marie-Claude Lavoie & Manisha Pahwa. (2011) Blunt versus sharp suture needles for preventing percutaneous exposure incidents in surgical staff. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2016:3.
Crossref
Crossref
Daniel R. Lefebvre, Louise F. Strande & Charles W. Hewitt. (2008) An Enzyme-Mediated Assay to Quantify Inoculation Volume Delivered by Suture Needlestick Injury: Two Gloves Are Better Than One. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 206:1, pages 113-122.
Crossref
Crossref
Monika Malhotra, Jai Bhagwan Sharma, Leena Wadhwa & Raksha Arora. (2004) Prospective study of glove perforation in obstetrical and gynecological operations: Are we safe enough?. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research 30:4, pages 319-322.
Crossref
Crossref
K.R. Hema & R. Johanson. (2001) Techniques for performing caesarean section. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology 15:1, pages 17-47.
Crossref
Crossref
E. Kovavisarach & P. Vanitchanon. (1999) Perforation in single- and double-gloving methods for cesarean section. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 67:3, pages 157-161.
Crossref
Crossref
S. D. Eckford, M. James, S. R. Jackson, A. J. Hamer & J. J. Browning. (1997) Detection of glove puncture and skin contamination during caesarean section. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 104:10, pages 1209-1211.
Crossref
Crossref
M. K. Stafford, V. S. Kitchen & J. R. Smith. (2005) Reducing the risk of blood borne infection in surgical practice. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 102:6, pages 439-441.
Crossref
Crossref
B. Arena, N. Maffulli, I. Vocaturo & G. Scognamiglio. (1992) Incidence of glove perforation during episiotomy repair. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 251:3, pages 111-114.
Crossref
Crossref
Frank D. Johnstone. (1992) 5 The effect of HIV infection on pregnancy outcome. Baillière's Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology 6:1, pages 69-84.
Crossref
Crossref
J. R. Smith & V. S. Kitchen. (1991) Reducing the risk of infection for obstetricians. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 98:2, pages 124-126.
Crossref
Crossref