Citations (14)
Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.
Read on this site (1)
Murat Akbas, Faik Mumtaz Koyuncu, Yeşim Bülbül, Burcu Artunc-Ulkumen & Alptekin Çetin. (2021) The impact of invasive prenatal testing on anxiety and sleep quality in pregnant women with a screen-positive result for aneuploidy. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology 42:1, pages 15-21.
Read now
Read now
Articles from other publishers (13)
Erica Danya Goldblatt Hyatt. (2019) Counseling Women Who Have Terminated a Pregnancy Due to Fetal Anomaly (TOPFA): The ACCEPT Model. Clinical Social Work Journal 49:1, pages 52-63.
Crossref
Crossref
Valentina Di Mattei, Federica Ferrari, Gaia Perego, Valentina Tobia, Fabio Mauro & Massimo Candiani. (2021) Decision-making factors in prenatal testing: A systematic review. Health Psychology Open 8:1, pages 205510292098745.
Crossref
Crossref
Marsha Michie. (2020) Is preparation a good reason for prenatal genetic testing? Ethical and critical questions. Birth Defects Research 112:4, pages 332-338.
Crossref
Crossref
Pawel Sadlecki, Marek Grabiec, Pawel Walentowicz & Malgorzata Walentowicz-Sadlecka. (2018) Why do patients decline amniocentesis? Analysis of factors influencing the decision to refuse invasive prenatal testing. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 18:1.
Crossref
Crossref
Sarah Long, Peter O’Leary, Roanna Lobo & Jan E. Dickinson. (2017) Women’s Understanding and Attitudes towards Down Syndrome and Other Genetic Conditions in the Context of Prenatal Screening. Journal of Genetic Counseling 27:3, pages 647-655.
Crossref
Crossref
S. L. van der Steen, E. M. Bunnik, M. G. Polak, K. E. M. Diderich, J. Verhagen-Visser, L. C. P. Govaerts, M. Joosten, M. F. C. M. Knapen, A. T. J. I. Go, D. Van Opstal, M. I. Srebniak, R. J. H. Galjaard, A. Tibben & S. R. Riedijk. (2017) Choosing between Higher and Lower Resolution Microarrays: do Pregnant Women Have Sufficient Knowledge to Make Informed Choices Consistent with their Attitude?. Journal of Genetic Counseling 27:1, pages 85-94.
Crossref
Crossref
Allison Werner-Lin, Frances K. Barg, Katherine S. Kellom, Kallyn J. Stumm, Lisa Pilchman, Ashley N. Tomlinson & Barbara A. Bernhardt. (2016) Couple’s Narratives of Communion and Isolation Following Abnormal Prenatal Microarray Testing Results. Qualitative Health Research 26:14, pages 1975-1987.
Crossref
Crossref
Allison Werner‐Lin, Judith L. M. McCoyd & Barbara A. Bernhardt. (2016) Balancing Genetics (Science) and Counseling (Art) in Prenatal Chromosomal Microarray Testing. Journal of Genetic Counseling 25:5, pages 855-867.
Crossref
Crossref
Maria Ekelin & Anna-Karin Larsson. (2016) Expectant parents’ attitudes to termination of pregnancy in general and in cases of fetal abnormality. Nordic Journal of Nursing Research 36:3, pages 128-135.
Crossref
Crossref
Monique Robinson, Craig E. Pennell, Neil J. McLean, Jessica E. Tearne, Wendy H. Oddy & John P. Newnham. (2015) Risk Perception in Pregnancy. European Psychologist 20:2, pages 120-127.
Crossref
Crossref
Judith L. M. McCoyd. 2015. Prenatal and Preimplantation Diagnosis. Prenatal and Preimplantation Diagnosis
269
285
.
Sam Riedijk, Karin Diderich, Sanne van der Steen, Lutgarde Govaerts, Marieke Joosten, Maarten Knapen, Femke de Vries, Diane van Opstal, Aad Tibben & Robert-Jan Galjaard. (2014) The Psychological Challenges of Replacing Conventional Karyotyping with Genomic SNP Array Analysis in Prenatal Testing. Journal of Clinical Medicine 3:3, pages 713-723.
Crossref
Crossref
Karina Dyrvig Honore & Ester Garne. (2014) Trends in prenatal diagnosis of congenital anomalies among live births over a 30-year period. Journal of Reproductive Biology and Health 2:1, pages 1.
Crossref
Crossref