Advanced search
Publication Cover
Acta Oncologica Volume 53, 2014 - Issue 7
Journal homepage
2,067
Views
21
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Colorectal cancer

Preferences for potential innovations in non-invasive colorectal cancer screening: A labeled discrete choice experiment for a Dutch screening campaign

Tim M. BenningInstitute of Health Policy & Management, Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The NetherlandsCorrespondence[email protected]
,
Benedict G. C. DellaertDepartment of Business Economics, Erasmus School of Economics, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
,
Carmen D. DirksenDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
&
Johan L. SeverensInstitute of Health Policy & Management, Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Pages 898-908 | Received 02 Jul 2013, Accepted 04 Dec 2013, Published online: 23 Jan 2014

Citations (21)

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Subscribe to citation updates

Read on this site (3)

Melanie Brinkmann, Isabell von Holt, Leonie Diedrich, Christian Krauth, Gabriele Seidel & Maren Dreier. (2022) Attributes Characterizing Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests That Influence Preferences of Individuals Eligible for Screening in Germany: A Qualitative Study. Patient Preference and Adherence 16, pages 2051-2066.
Read now
Pochamana Phisalprapa, Surachat Ngorsuraches, Tanatape Wanishayakorn, Chayanis Kositamongkol, Siripen Supakankunti & Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk. (2021) Estimating the preferences and willingness-to-pay for colorectal cancer screening: an opportunity to incorporate the perspective of population at risk into policy development in Thailand. Journal of Medical Economics 24:1, pages 226-233.
Read now
Joanne M Osborne, Ingrid Flight, Carlene J Wilson, Gang Chen, Julie Ratcliffe & Graeme P Young. (2018) The impact of sample type and procedural attributes on relative acceptability of different colorectal cancer screening regimens. Patient Preference and Adherence 12, pages 1825-1836.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (18)

Kaitlyn V. Davis, Mie H. Hallman, Melissa DiCarlo, Sophie M. Wambua, Rachel L. Jaffe, Allison W. Welsh, Cameron Kerber, Hushan Yang, Christopher V. Chambers & Ronald E. Myers. (2022) Factors Likely to Affect the Uptake of Genomic Approaches to Cancer Screening in Primary Care: A Scoping Review. Journal of Personalized Medicine 12:12, pages 2044.
Crossref
Samare P.I. Huls & Esther W. de Bekker-Grob. (2022) Can healthcare choice be predicted using stated preference data? The role of model complexity in a discrete choice experiment about colorectal cancer screening. Social Science & Medicine 315, pages 115530.
Crossref
Melanie Brinkmann, Lara Marleen Fricke, Leonie Diedrich, Bernt-Peter Robra, Christian Krauth & Maren Dreier. (2022) Attributes in stated preference elicitation studies on colorectal cancer screening and their relative importance for decision-making among screenees: a systematic review. Health Economics Review 12:1.
Crossref
Rebekah Hall, Antonieta Medina-Lara, Willie Hamilton & Anne E. Spencer. (2021) Attributes Used for Cancer Screening Discrete Choice Experiments: A Systematic Review. The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research 15:3, pages 269-285.
Crossref
Thuy Ngan Tran, Allegra Ferrari, Sarah Hoeck, Marc Peeters & Guido Van Hal. (2021) Colorectal Cancer Screening: Have We Addressed Concerns and Needs of the Target Population?. Gastrointestinal Disorders 3:4, pages 173-203.
Crossref
Maaike M. Rademaker, Brigitte A. B. Essers, Robert J. Stokroos, Adriana L. Smit & Inge Stegeman. (2021) What Tinnitus Therapy Outcome Measures Are Important for Patients?– A Discrete Choice Experiment. Frontiers in Neurology 12.
Crossref
Enea Ferlizza, Rossella Solmi, Michela Sgarzi, Luigi Ricciardiello & Mattia Lauriola. (2021) The Roadmap of Colorectal Cancer Screening. Cancers 13:5, pages 1101.
Crossref
Sonja Neumeyer, Xinwei Hua, Petra Seibold, Lina Jansen, Axel Benner, Barbara Burwinkel, Niels Halama, Sonja I. Berndt, Amanda I. Phipps, Lori C. Sakoda, Robert E. Schoen, Martha L. Slattery, Andrew T. Chan, Manish Gala, Amit D. Joshi, Shuji Ogino, Mingyang Song, Esther Herpel, Hendrik Bläker, Matthias Kloor, Dominique Scherer, Alexis Ulrich, Cornelia M. Ulrich, Aung K. Win, Jane C. Figueiredo, John L. Hopper, Finlay Macrae, Roger L. Milne, Graham G. Giles, Daniel D. Buchanan, Ulrike Peters, Michael Hoffmeister, Hermann Brenner, Polly A. Newcomb & Jenny Chang-Claude. (2020) Genetic Variants in the Regulatory T cell–Related Pathway and Colorectal Cancer Prognosis. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention 29:12, pages 2719-2728.
Crossref
Norma B. Bulamu, Gang Chen, Tim Bright, Julie Ratcliffe, Adrian Chung, Robert J. L. Fraser, Björn Törnqvist & David I. Watson. (2018) Preferences for Surveillance of Barrett’s Oesophagus: a Discrete Choice Experiment. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 23:7, pages 1309-1317.
Crossref
Minhong Jeun, Hyo Jeong Lee, Sungwook Park, Eun‐ju Do, Jaewon Choi, You‐Na Sung, Seung‐Mo Hong, Sang‐Yeob Kim, Dong‐Hee Kim, Ja Young Kang, Hye‐Nam Son, Jinmyoung Joo, Eun Mi Song, Sung Wook Hwang, Sang Hyoung Park, Dong‐Hoon Yang, Byong Duk Ye, Jeong‐Sik Byeon, Jaewon Choe, Suk‐Kyun Yang, Helen Moinova, Sanford D. Markowitz, Kwan Hyi Lee & Seung‐Jae Myung. (2019) A Novel Blood‐Based Colorectal Cancer Diagnostic Technology Using Electrical Detection of Colon Cancer Secreted Protein‐2. Advanced Science 6:11.
Crossref
Deirdre Weymann, David L. Veenstra, Gail P. Jarvik & Dean A. Regier. (2018) Patient preferences for massively parallel sequencing genetic testing of colorectal cancer risk: a discrete choice experiment. European Journal of Human Genetics 26:9, pages 1257-1265.
Crossref
Vajiheh Ramezani Doroh, Alireza Delavari, Mehdi Yaseri, Sara Emamgholipour Sefiddashti & Ali Akbari Sari. (2018) Preferences for Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests: Differences Between Insured and Uninsured Beneficiaries of Iranian Health Transformation Plan. Health Scope 7:S.
Crossref
Richard De Abreu Lourenco, Marion Haas, Jane Hall & Rosalie Viney. (2016) Valuing Meta-Health Effects for Use in Economic Evaluations to Inform Reimbursement Decisions: A Review of the Evidence. PharmacoEconomics 35:3, pages 347-362.
Crossref
Laura Ciarloni, Sahar Hosseinian Ehrensberger, Natsuko Imaizumi, Sylvain Monnier-Benoit, Cristina Nichita, Seung-Jae Myung, Joo Sung Kim, Si Young Song, Tae Il Kim, Boudewijn van der Weg, Rémy Meier, Jan Borovicka, Christoph Beglinger, Cédric Vallet, Philippe Maerten, Curzio Rüegg & Gian Dorta. (2016) Development and Clinical Validation of a Blood Test Based on 29-Gene Expression for Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer. Clinical Cancer Research 22:18, pages 4604-4611.
Crossref
Carol Mansfield, Florence K. L. Tangka, Donatus U. Ekwueme, Judith Lee Smith, Gery P. GuyJrJr, Chunyu Li & A. Brett Hauber. (2016) Stated Preference for Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review of the Literature, 1990?2013. Preventing Chronic Disease 13.
Crossref
Erin L Symonds, Susanne Pedersen, Stephen R Cole, Joseph Massolino, Daniel Byrne, John Guy, Patricia Backhouse, Robert J Fraser, Lawrence LaPointe & Graeme P Young. (2016) Improving Participation in Colorectal Cancer Screening: a Randomised Controlled Trial of Sequential Offers of Faecal then Blood Based Non-Invasive Tests. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention 16:18, pages 8455-8460.
Crossref
Erin L Symonds, Susanne K Pedersen, Rohan T Baker, David H Murray, Snigdha Gaur, Stephen R Cole, Geetha Gopalsamy, Dileep Mangira, Lawrence C LaPointe & Graeme P Young. (2016) A Blood Test for Methylated BCAT1 and IKZF1 vs. a Fecal Immunochemical Test for Detection of Colorectal Neoplasia. Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology 7:1, pages e137.
Crossref
Tim M. Benning, Benedict G.C. Dellaert, Johan L. Severens & Carmen D. Dirksen. (2014) The Effect of Presenting Information about Invasive Follow-Up Testing on Individuals? Noninvasive Colorectal Cancer Screening Participation Decision: Results from a Discrete Choice Experiment. Value in Health 17:5, pages 578-587.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.