Advanced search
Publication Cover
British Journal of Audiology Volume 23, 1989 - Issue 3
Journal homepage
19
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

A comparative evaluation of four hearing aid selection procedures. I—Speech discrimination measures of benefit

Roger Green Audiology Unit, Royal Berkshire Hospital, London Road, Reading, RG1 5AN
,
Simon Day Audiology Unit, Royal Berkshire Hospital, London Road, Reading, RG1 5AN
&
John Bamford Audiology Unit, Royal Berkshire Hospital, London Road, Reading, RG1 5AN
Pages 185-199 | Received 07 Aug 1987, Accepted 26 Oct 1987, Published online: 12 Oct 2009

Citations (7)

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Subscribe to citation updates

Read on this site (5)

Kirsten Carola Wagener & Thomas Brand. (2005) Sentence intelligibility in noise for listeners with normal hearing and hearing impairment: Influence of measurement procedure and masking parameters La inteligibilidad de frases en silencio para sujetos con audición normal y con hipoacusia: la influencia del procedimiento de medición y de los parámetros de enmascaramiento. International Journal of Audiology 44:3, pages 144-156.
Read now
Jonathan O. Parsons & Charles R. Clark. (2002) Comparison of an ‘intuitive’ NHS hearing aid prescription method with DSL 4.1 targets for amplification: Comparación de un metodo “intuitivo” de prescripción de auxiliares auditivos en el NHS, con las metas de amplificación DSL 4.1. International Journal of Audiology 41:6, pages 357-362.
Read now
R. G. C. Harrowven. (1998) Insertion Gain versus Median Ear Corrected Coupler Gain: A Comparison of Two Fitting Methods in New NHS Hearing Aid Users. British Journal of Audiology 32:3, pages 153-165.
Read now
D. N. Brooks. (1990) Measures for the assessment of hearing aid provision and rehabilitation. British Journal of Audiology 24:4, pages 229-233.
Read now
Roger Green, Simon Day & John Bamford. (1989) A comparative evaluation of four hearing-aid selection procedures. II—Quality judgements as measures of benefit. British Journal of Audiology 23:3, pages 201-206.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (2)

James R. Curran & Jason A. Galster. (2013) The Master Hearing Aid. Trends in Amplification 17:2, pages 108-134.
Crossref
Sdg Stephens & R. Meredith. (2016) Qualitative reports of hearing aid benefit. Clinical Rehabilitation 5:3, pages 225-229.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.