Citations (27)
Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.
Read on this site (3)
Tatiana A. Nazarenko, Yana O. Martirosyan, Almina M. Birukova, Irina E. Korneeva, JuliaV. Sokolova & Diana G. Khubaeva. (2021) Outcomes of ovarian stimulation in the follicular and luteal phases of the menstrual cycle in cancer patients. Gynecological Endocrinology 37:sup1, pages 13-16.
Read now
Read now
Jie Li, Yan Sun, Sien Mo, Shujia Wang & Weiwei Luo. (2021) Effects of oral contraceptive for different responder women before GnRH antagonists: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gynecological Endocrinology 37:11, pages 977-986.
Read now
Read now
Bailing Jin, Zhihong Niu, Bufang Xu, Qian Chen & Aijun Zhang. (2018) Comparison of clinical outcomes among dual ovarian stimulation, mild stimulation and luteal phase stimulation protocols in women with poor ovarian response. Gynecological Endocrinology 34:8, pages 694-697.
Read now
Read now
Articles from other publishers (24)
Martina Capuzzo & Antonio La Marca. 2024. Handbook of Current and Novel Protocols for the Treatment of Infertility. Handbook of Current and Novel Protocols for the Treatment of Infertility
179
188
.
Eleni Kolibianaki & Efstratios Kolibianakis. 2024. Handbook of Current and Novel Protocols for the Treatment of Infertility. Handbook of Current and Novel Protocols for the Treatment of Infertility
125
138
.
Pasquale Petrone, Alberto Vaiarelli & Christophe Blockeel. (2023) Double stimulation for the management of poor-prognosis patients: where are we going?. Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology 35:3, pages 246-253.
Crossref
Crossref
N Massin, I Abdennebi, G Porcu-Buisson, N Chevalier, E Descat, C Piétin-Vialle, S Goro, M Brussieux, M Pinto, M Pasquier & H Bry-Gauillard. (2023) The BISTIM study: a randomized controlled trial comparing dual ovarian stimulation (duostim) with two conventional ovarian stimulations in poor ovarian responders undergoing IVF. Human Reproduction 38:5, pages 927-937.
Crossref
Crossref
Xuefeng Lu & Yanping Kuang. 2022. Ovarian Stimulation. Ovarian Stimulation
93
100
.
Serkan Oral, Meriç Karacan, Yaşam K. Akpak, Alper Şişmanoğlu & Ceyda Sancaklı Usta. (2021) Live birth rate with double ovarian stimulation is superior to follicular phase ovarian stimulation per started cycle in poor ovarian responders. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research 47:8, pages 2705-2712.
Crossref
Crossref
Buo-Jia Lu, Chien-Ju Lin, Bou-Zenn Lin, Li Huang, Li-Ting Chien & Chi-Huang Chen. (2021) ART outcomes following ovarian stimulation in the luteal phase:a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 38:8, pages 1927-1938.
Crossref
Crossref
Joaquín Llácer, Belén Moliner, Lydia Luque, Andrea Bernabéu, Belén Lledó, Juan Carlos Castillo, Jaime Guerrero, Jorge Ten & Rafael Bernabéu. (2020) Luteal phase stimulation versus follicular phase stimulation in poor ovarian responders: results of a randomized controlled trial. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology 18:1.
Crossref
Crossref
Nona Mishieva, Bella Martazanova, Khava Bogatyreva, Anna Korolkova, Anastasia Kirillova, Maria Veyukova, Olga Burmenskaya, Aydar Abubakirov & Gennady T Sukhikh. (2020) Cumulus cell gene expression in luteal-phase-derived oocytes after double stimulation in one menstrual cycle. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 41:3, pages 518-526.
Crossref
Crossref
Angela Baerwald & Roger Pierson. (2020) Ovarian follicular waves during the menstrual cycle: physiologic insights into novel approaches for ovarian stimulation. Fertility and Sterility 114:3, pages 443-457.
Crossref
Crossref
Danilo Cimadomo, Ramona Carmelo, Elvira Immacolata Parrotta, Stefania Scalise, Gianluca Santamaria, Erminia Alviggi, Maria Teresa De Angelis, Gianmarco Sarro, Alberto Vaiarelli, Roberta Venturella, Laura Rienzi, Fulvio Zullo, Filippo Maria Ubaldi & Giovanni Cuda. (2019) Similar miRNomic signatures characterize the follicular fluids collected after follicular and luteal phase stimulations in the same ovarian cycle. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 37:1, pages 149-158.
Crossref
Crossref
Gautam Nand Allahbadia, Goral Gandhi, Akanksha Allahbadia Gupta & A. H. Maham. 2020. Textbook of Assisted Reproduction. Textbook of Assisted Reproduction
631
641
.
Qiuju Chen & Yanping Kuang. 2020. Pick Up and Oocyte Management. Pick Up and Oocyte Management
179
194
.
Qian Peng, Xiang Cao, Jing Wang, Lin Wang, Jun Xu, Xiaowei Ji, Suying Liu, Jin Zhu & Xi Dong. (2019) Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation vs mild stimulation in women with advanced age above 40: a retrospective cohort study. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology 17:1.
Crossref
Crossref
Reda S. Hussein, Ihab Elnashar, Ahmed F. Amin, Hisham A. Abou-Taleb, Ahmed M. Abbas, Ahmed M. Abdelmageed, Tarek Farghaly & Yulian Zhao. (2019) Revisiting debates of premature luteinization and its effect on assisted reproductive technology outcome. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 36:11, pages 2195-2206.
Crossref
Crossref
Antonio La Marca & Martina Capuzzo. (2019) Use of progestins to inhibit spontaneous ovulation during ovarian stimulation: the beginning of a new era?. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 39:2, pages 321-331.
Crossref
Crossref
Filippo Maria Ubaldi, Danilo Cimadomo, Alberto Vaiarelli, Gemma Fabozzi, Roberta Venturella, Roberta Maggiulli, Rossella Mazzilli, Susanna Ferrero, Antonio Palagiano & Laura Rienzi. (2019) Advanced Maternal Age in IVF: Still a Challenge? The Present and the Future of Its Treatment. Frontiers in Endocrinology 10.
Crossref
Crossref
Giovanna Sighinolfi, Sesh Kamal Sunkara & Antonio La Marca. (2018) New strategies of ovarian stimulation based on the concept of ovarian follicular waves: From conventional to random and double stimulation. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 37:4, pages 489-497.
Crossref
Crossref
Apostolos Kaponis, Elpiniki Chronopoulou & George Decavalas. (2018) The curious case of premature luteinization. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 35:10, pages 1723-1740.
Crossref
Crossref
Danilo Cimadomo, Alberto Vaiarelli, Silvia Colamaria, Elisabetta Trabucco, Carlo Alviggi, Roberta Venturella, Erminia Alviggi, Ramona Carmelo, Laura Rienzi & Filippo Maria Ubaldi. (2018) Luteal phase anovulatory follicles result in the production of competent oocytes: intra-patient paired case-control study comparing follicular versus luteal phase stimulations in the same ovarian cycle. Human Reproduction 33:8, pages 1442-1448.
Crossref
Crossref
Alberto Vaiarelli, Danilo Cimadomo, Nicolò Ubaldi, Laura Rienzi & Filippo Maria Ubaldi. (2018) What is new in the management of poor ovarian response in IVF?. Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology 30:3, pages 155-162.
Crossref
Crossref
Li-Te Lin, Salvatore Giovanni Vitale, San-Nung Chen, Zhi-Hong Wen, Hsiao-Wen Tsai, Chyi-uei Chern & Kuan-Hao Tsui. (2018) Luteal Phase Ovarian Stimulation May Improve Oocyte Retrieval and Oocyte Quality in Poor Ovarian Responders Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization: Preliminary Results from a Single-Center Prospective Pilot Study. Advances in Therapy 35:6, pages 847-856.
Crossref
Crossref
Nathalie Massin. (2017) New stimulation regimens: endogenous and exogenous progesterone use to block the LH surge during ovarian stimulation for IVF. Human Reproduction Update.
Crossref
Crossref
Qiong Zhang, Xiaoyue M. Guo & Yanping Li. (2017) Implantation rates subsequent to the transfer of embryos produced at different phases during double stimulation of poor ovarian responders. Reproduction, Fertility and Development 29:6, pages 1178.
Crossref
Crossref