Advanced search
Publication Cover
The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine Volume 29, 2016 - Issue 12
Submit an article Journal homepage
709
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

30 mL Single- versus 80 mL double-balloon catheter for pre-induction cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial

Kara K. HoppeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA, Correspondence[email protected]
,
Melissa A. SchiffDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA, ;Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA,
,
Suzanne E. PetersonSwedish Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA, and
&
Michael G. GravettDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA, ;Global Alliance to Prevent Prematurity and Stillbirth (GAPPS), Seattle Children’s, Seattle, WA, USA
Pages 1919-1925 | Received 13 May 2015, Accepted 25 Jun 2015, Published online: 13 Aug 2015

Citations (19)

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Subscribe to citation updates

Read on this site (1)

Ido Solt, Maya Frank Wolf, Shani Ben-Haroush, Svetlana Kaminskyi, Ella Ophir & Jacob Bornstein. (2021) Foley catheter versus cervical double balloon for labor induction: a prospective randomized study. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine 34:7, pages 1034-1041.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (18)

Morgan D. Peel, Doortje M. R. Croll, Jørg Kessler, Birte Haugland, Craig E. Pennell, Jan E. Dickinson, Raed Salim, Noah Zafran, Kirsten R. Palmer, Ben W. Mol & Wentao Li. (2023) Double‐vs single‐balloon catheter for induction of labor: Systematic review and individual participant data meta‐analysis. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 102:11, pages 1440-1449.
Crossref
Luis Sanchez-Ramos, Lisa D. Levine, Anthony C. Sciscione, Ellen L. Mozurkewich, Patrick S. Ramsey, Charles David Adair, Andrew M. Kaunitz & Jordan A. McKinney. (2023) Methods for the induction of labor: efficacy and safety. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Crossref
Marieke DT de Vaan, Mieke LG ten Eikelder, Marta Jozwiak, Kirsten R Palmer, Miranda Davies-Tuck, Kitty WM Bloemenkamp, Ben Willem J Mol & Michel Boulvain. (2023) Mechanical methods for induction of labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2023:7.
Crossref
Ge Zhao, Guang Song & Jing Liu. (2022) Safety and efficacy of double-balloon catheter for cervical ripening: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 22:1.
Crossref
Alicia Martínez-Varea, Andrea Santolaria-Baig, Carlos Sánchez-Ajenjo, Rogelio Monfort-Ortiz, Alfredo Perales-Marín & Vicente Diago-Almela. (2022) Mechanical cervical ripening for prolonged pregnancies with a previous cesarean section: Double-balloon catheter vs Foley catheter. Obstetrics & Gynecology International Journal 13:4, pages 212-216.
Crossref
Mehmet Obut, Deniz Balsak, Kemal Sarsmaz, Harun E. Tolunay, Erol N. Varlı, Dilek Şahin & Aykan Yücel. (2021) Double Foley catheter for labor induction: An alternative method. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 155:3, pages 496-504.
Crossref
Lisa D. Levine, Catalina M. Valencia & Jorge E. Tolosa. (2020) Induction of labor in continuing pregnancies. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology 67, pages 90-99.
Crossref
Inna Bleicher, Elena Dikopoltsev, Einav Kadour-Ferro, Rami Sammour, Ron Gonen, Shlomi Sagi, Aya Eshel, Liraz Nussam & Dana Vitner. (2020) Double-Balloon Device for 6 Compared With 12 Hours for Cervical Ripening. Obstetrics & Gynecology 135:5, pages 1153-1160.
Crossref
Lisa D. Levine. (2020) Cervical ripening: Why we do what we do. Seminars in Perinatology 44:2, pages 151216.
Crossref
Xiyao Liu, Yu Wang, Fan Zhang, Xiaoni Zhong, Rong Ou, Xin Luo & Hongbo Qi. (2019) Double- versus single-balloon catheters for labour induction and cervical ripening: a meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 19:1.
Crossref
Marieke DT de Vaan, Mieke LG ten Eikelder, Marta Jozwiak, Kirsten R Palmer, Miranda Davies-Tuck, Kitty WM Bloemenkamp, Ben Willem J Mol & Michel Boulvain. (2019) Mechanical methods for induction of labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2019:10.
Crossref
Therese M McGee, Beata Gidaszewski, Marjan Khajehei, Toni Tse & Emma Gibbs. (2018) Foley catheter silicone versus latex for term outpatient induction of labour: A randomised trial. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 59:2, pages 235-242.
Crossref
Gözde Demirezen, Berna Aslan Çetin, Begüm Aydoğan Mathyk, Nadiye Köroğlu & Gökhan Yildirim. (2018) Efficiency of the Foley catheter versus the double balloon catheter during the induction of second trimester pregnancy terminations: a randomized controlled trial. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 298:5, pages 881-887.
Crossref
Héctor Lajusticia, Samuel J. Martínez-Domínguez, Gonzalo R. Pérez-Roncero, Peter Chedraui & Faustino R. Pérez-López. (2018) Single versus double-balloon catheters for the induction of labor of singleton pregnancies: a meta-analysis of randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 297:5, pages 1089-1100.
Crossref
Raed Salim, Naama Schwartz, Noah Zafran, Sivan Zuarez-Easton, Gali Garmi & Shabtai Romano. (2017) Comparison of single- and double-balloon catheters for labor induction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Perinatology 38:3, pages 217-225.
Crossref
Fang Yang, Shijin Huang, Yu Long & Lingling Huang. (2018) Double-balloon versus single-balloon catheter for cervical ripening and labor induction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research 44:1, pages 27-34.
Crossref
Camil Castelo-Branco. (2017) Induction of Labour: Eternal Controversy. International Journal of Pregnancy & Child Birth 3:3.
Crossref
YM Du, LY Zhu, LN Cui, BH Jin & JL Ou. (2017) Double-balloon catheter versus prostaglandin E2 for cervical ripening and labour induction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 124:6, pages 891-899.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.