Citations (48)
Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.
Read on this site (8)
Elien Van den Borre, Sam Denys, Astrid van Wieringen & Jan Wouters. (2021) The digit triplet test: a scoping review. International Journal of Audiology 60:12, pages 946-963.
Read now
Read now
Samanta Gallo & Alessandro Castiglione. (2019) The signal-to-noise ratio assessment in cochlear implanted patients through the Italian Matrix Sentence test (Oldenburg test). Hearing, Balance and Communication 17:2, pages 145-148.
Read now
Read now
Annelies Devesse, Alexander Dudek, Astrid van Wieringen & Jan Wouters. (2018) Speech intelligibility of virtual humans. International Journal of Audiology 57:12, pages 914-922.
Read now
Read now
Dimitar Spirrov, Bas van Dijk & Tom Francart. (2018) Optimal gain control step sizes for bimodal stimulation. International Journal of Audiology 57:3, pages 184-193.
Read now
Read now
Sabine Hochmuth, Tim Jürgens, Thomas Brand & Birger Kollmeier. (2015) Talker- and language-specific effects on speech intelligibility in noise assessed with bilingual talkers: Which language is more robust against noise and reverberation?. International Journal of Audiology 54:sup2, pages 23-34.
Read now
Read now
Sabine Hochmuth, Birger Kollmeier, Thomas Brand & Tim Jürgens. (2015) Influence of noise type on speech reception thresholds across four languages measured with matrix sentence tests. International Journal of Audiology 54:sup2, pages 62-70.
Read now
Read now
John H. Grose, Silvana Griz, Fernando A. Pacífico, Karina P. Advíncula & Denise C. Menezes. (2015) Modulation masking release using the Brazilian-Portuguese HINT: Psychometric functions and the effect of speech time compression. International Journal of Audiology 54:4, pages 274-281.
Read now
Read now
Sofie Jansen, Heleen Luts, Kirsten Carola Wagener, Birger Kollmeier, Matthieu Del Rio, René Dauman, Chris James, Bernard Fraysse, Emilie Vormès, Bruno Frachet, Jan Wouters & Astrid van Wieringen. (2012) Comparison of three types of French speech-in-noise tests: A multi-center study. International Journal of Audiology 51:3, pages 164-173.
Read now
Read now
Articles from other publishers (40)
Lyan Porto, Jan Wouters & Astrid van Wieringen. (2023) Speech perception in noise, working memory, and attention in children: A scoping review. Hearing Research 439, pages 108883.
Crossref
Crossref
Mira Van Wilderode, Nathan Van Humbeeck, Ralf T. Krampe & Astrid van Wieringen. (2023) Toward a Listening Training Paradigm: Evaluation in Normal-Hearing Young and Middle-Aged Adults. Ear & Hearing 44:5, pages 1229-1239.
Crossref
Crossref
Matthias Hey, Alexander Mewes & Thomas Hocke. (2022) Speech comprehension in noise—considerations for ecologically valid assessment of communication skills ability with cochlear implantsSprachverstehen im Störschall—Überlegungen zur ökologisch validen Bewertung der Kommunikationsfähigkeit mit Cochleaimplantat. HNO 71:S1, pages 26-34.
Crossref
Crossref
Diego Ruiz Callejo, Jan Wouters & Bart Boets. (2023) Speech‐in‐noise perception in autistic adolescents with and without early language delay. Autism Research.
Crossref
Crossref
Jaehoon Jung, Byoung-Duk Lim, Hyoji Shin & Jae Hee Lee. (2023) Benefits from Spatial Separation and Fluctuating Masker on Sentence-in-Noise Recognition in Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners. Audiology and Speech Research 19:2, pages 104-115.
Crossref
Crossref
Matthias Hey, Alexander Mewes & Thomas Hocke. (2022) Sprachverstehen im Störschall – Überlegungen zur ökologisch validen Bewertung der Kommunikationsfähigkeit mit CochleaimplantatSpeech comprehension in noise—considerations for ecologically valid assessment of communication skills ability with cochlear implants. German version. HNO 70:12, pages 861-869.
Crossref
Crossref
Victoria Stenbäck, Erik Marsja, Mathias Hällgren, Björn Lyxell & Birgitta Larsby. (2022) Informational Masking and Listening Effort in Speech Recognition in Noise: The Role of Working Memory Capacity and Inhibitory Control in Older Adults With and Without Hearing Impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 65:11, pages 4417-4428.
Crossref
Crossref
Leontien Pragt, Peter van Hengel, Dagmar Grob & Jan-Willem A. Wasmann. (2022) Preliminary Evaluation of Automated Speech Recognition Apps for the Hearing Impaired and Deaf. Frontiers in Digital Health 4.
Crossref
Crossref
Jan Heeren, Theresa Nuesse, Matthias Latzel, Inga Holube, Volker Hohmann, Kirsten C. Wagener & Michael Schulte. (2022) The Concurrent OLSA Test: A Method for Speech Recognition in Multi-talker Situations at Fixed SNR. Trends in Hearing 26, pages 233121652211082.
Crossref
Crossref
Ji-Sheng Liu, Yang-Wenyi Liu, Ya-Feng Yu, John J. GalvinIIIIII, Qian-Jie Fu & Duo-Duo Tao. (2021) Segregation of competing speech in adults and children with normal hearing and in children with cochlear implants. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 150:1, pages 339-352.
Crossref
Crossref
Paz Har-shai Yahav & Elana Zion Golumbic. (2021) Linguistic processing of task-irrelevant speech at a cocktail party. eLife 10.
Crossref
Crossref
Annelies DevesseAstrid van WieringenJan Wouters. (2021) The Cost of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Cognitive Demands on Auditory Functioning in Older Adults With Normal Hearing or Using Hearing Aids. Ear & Hearing 42:3, pages 615-628.
Crossref
Crossref
Ben Somers, Damien Lesenfants, Jonas Vanthornhout, Lien Decruy, Eline Verschueren & Tom Francart. 2021. Brain-Computer Interface Research. Brain-Computer Interface Research
53
63
.
Naveen K. Nagaraj, Beula M. Magimairaj & Sarah Schwartz. (2020) Auditory distraction in school-age children relative to individual differences in working memory capacity. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 82:7, pages 3581-3593.
Crossref
Crossref
Annelies Devesse, Jan Wouters & Astrid van Wieringen. (2020) Age Affects Speech Understanding and Multitask Costs. Ear & Hearing 41:5, pages 1412-1415.
Crossref
Crossref
Benjamin DieudonnéTom Francart. (2020) Speech Understanding With Bimodal Stimulation Is Determined by Monaural Signal to Noise Ratios: No Binaural Cue Processing Involved. Ear & Hearing 41:5, pages 1158-1171.
Crossref
Crossref
Lien Decruy, Jonas Vanthornhout & Tom Francart. (2020) Hearing impairment is associated with enhanced neural tracking of the speech envelope. Hearing Research 393, pages 107961.
Crossref
Crossref
Annelies DevesseAstrid van WieringenJan Wouters. (2020) AVATAR Assesses Speech Understanding and Multitask Costs in Ecologically Relevant Listening Situations. Ear & Hearing 41:3, pages 521-531.
Crossref
Crossref
Dimitar Spirrov, Eugen Kludt, Eline Verschueren, Andreas Büchner & Tom Francart. (2020) Effect of (Mis)Matched Compression Speed on Speech Recognition in Bimodal Listeners. Trends in Hearing 24, pages 233121652094897.
Crossref
Crossref
D. Lesenfants, J. Vanthornhout, E. Verschueren, L. Decruy & T. Francart. (2019) Predicting individual speech intelligibility from the cortical tracking of acoustic- and phonetic-level speech representations. Hearing Research 380, pages 1-9.
Crossref
Crossref
Lien Decruy, Jonas Vanthornhout & Tom Francart. (2019) Evidence for enhanced neural tracking of the speech envelope underlying age-related speech-in-noise difficulties. Journal of Neurophysiology 122:2, pages 601-615.
Crossref
Crossref
A. Michelle Tanner, Emily R. SpitzerJP Hyzy & John H. Grose. (2019) Masking Release for Speech in Modulated Maskers: Electrophysiological and Behavioral Measures. Ear & Hearing 40:4, pages 1009-1015.
Crossref
Crossref
Benjamin DieudonnéTom Francart. (2019) Redundant Information Is Sometimes More Beneficial Than Spatial Information to Understand Speech in Noise. Ear & Hearing 40:3, pages 545-554.
Crossref
Crossref
Jelmer van Schoonhoven, Koenraad S. Rhebergen & Wouter A. Dreschler. (2019) The Extended Speech Transmission Index: Predicting speech intelligibility in fluctuating noise and reverberant rooms. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 145:3, pages 1178-1194.
Crossref
Crossref
Tilde Van Hirtum, Arturo Moncada-Torres, Pol Ghesquière & Jan Wouters. (2019) Speech Envelope Enhancement Instantaneously Effaces Atypical Speech Perception in Dyslexia. Ear and Hearing 40:5, pages 1242-1252.
Crossref
Crossref
Tine Goossens, Charlotte Vercammen, Jan Wouters & Astrid van Wieringen. (2018) Neural envelope encoding predicts speech perception performance for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired adults. Hearing Research 370, pages 189-200.
Crossref
Crossref
Barbara Ohlenforst, Dorothea Wendt, Sophia E. Kramer, Graham Naylor, Adriana A. Zekveld & Thomas Lunner. (2018) Impact of SNR, masker type and noise reduction processing on sentence recognition performance and listening effort as indicated by the pupil dilation response. Hearing Research 365, pages 90-99.
Crossref
Crossref
Eline C. van Knijff, Martine Coene & Paul J. Govaerts. (2018) Speech understanding in noise in elderly adults: the effect of inhibitory control and syntactic complexity. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders 53:3, pages 628-642.
Crossref
Crossref
Lien Decruy, Neetha Das, Eline Verschueren & Tom Francart. (2018) The Self-Assessed Békesy Procedure: Validation of a Method to Measure Intelligibility of Connected Discourse. Trends in Hearing 22, pages 233121651880270.
Crossref
Crossref
Melanie Krueger, Michael Schulte, Melanie A. Zokoll, Kirsten C. Wagener, Markus Meis, Thomas Brand & Inga Holube. (2017) Relation Between Listening Effort and Speech Intelligibility in Noise. American Journal of Audiology 26:3S, pages 378-392.
Crossref
Crossref
Tine Goossens, Charlotte Vercammen, Jan Wouters & Astrid van Wieringen. (2017) Masked speech perception across the adult lifespan: Impact of age and hearing impairment. Hearing Research 344, pages 109-124.
Crossref
Crossref
Elke M. J. Devocht, A. Miranda L. Janssen, Josef Chalupper, Robert J. Stokroos & Erwin L. J. George. (2016) Monaural Beamforming in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users: Effect of (A)symmetric Directivity and Noise Type. PLOS ONE 11:8, pages e0160829.
Crossref
Crossref
Rebecca Carroll & Esther Ruigendijk. (2016) ERP responses to processing prosodic phrasing of sentences in amplitude modulated noise. Neuropsychologia 82, pages 91-103.
Crossref
Crossref
Norbert Dillier & Wai Kong Lai. (2015) Speech Intelligibility in Various Noise Conditions with the Nucleus® 5 Cp810 Sound Processor. Audiology Research 5:2, pages 132.
Crossref
Crossref
Rochelle S. Newman, Giovanna Morini, Faraz Ahsan & Gerald KiddJr.Jr.. (2015) Linguistically-based informational masking in preschool children. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 138:1, pages EL93-EL98.
Crossref
Crossref
Niklas Rönnberg, Mary Rudner, Thomas Lunner & Stefan Stenfelt. (2014) Memory performance on the Auditory Inference Span Test is independent of background noise type for young adults with normal hearing at high speech intelligibility. Frontiers in Psychology 5.
Crossref
Crossref
Koenraad S. Rhebergen, Ruben E. Pool & Wouter A. Dreschler. (2014) Characterizing the Speech Reception Threshold in hearing-impaired listeners in relation to masker type and masker level. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 135:3, pages 1491-1505.
Crossref
Crossref
Obaid ur Rehman Qazi, Bas van Dijk, Marc Moonen & Jan Wouters. (2013) Understanding the effect of noise on electrical stimulation sequences in cochlear implants and its impact on speech intelligibility. Hearing Research 299, pages 79-87.
Crossref
Crossref
Tom Francart & Hugh McDermott. (2012) Speech Perception and Localisation with SCORE Bimodal: A Loudness Normalisation Strategy for Combined Cochlear Implant and Hearing Aid Stimulation. PLoS ONE 7:10, pages e45385.
Crossref
Crossref
O. ur Rehman Qazi, B. van Dijk, M. Moonen & J. Wouters. (2012) Speech Understanding Performance of Cochlear Implant Subjects Using Time–Frequency Masking-Based Noise Reduction. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 59:5, pages 1364-1373.
Crossref
Crossref