7,944
Views
34
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Quality of Environmental Impact Assessment: Finnish EISs and the opinions of EIA professionals

, , &
Pages 15-27 | Published online: 20 Feb 2012

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (10)

R.C. Alberts, F.P. Retief, J. Arts, C. Roos, D.P Cilliers & T.B. Fischer. (2022) EIA decision-making and administrative justice: the substance of just decisions. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 40:4, pages 296-304.
Read now
Álvaro Enríquez-de-Salamanca. (2019) Environmental assessment: a third division subject at the university. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 37:5, pages 452-454.
Read now
Jie Ma, Peter N. Duinker & Tony R. Walker. (2018) Scholar and practitioner views on science in environmental assessment. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 36:6, pages 516-528.
Read now
Samantha Paredes, Sean Pascoe, Louisa Coglan, Sarah Jennings, Satoshi Yamazaki & James Innes. (2017) At-sea dumping of dredge spoil: an overview of the Australian policy and legislative framework. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management 24:2, pages 184-199.
Read now
Ivar Lyhne, Matthew Cashmore, Hens Runhaar & Frank van Laerhoven. (2016) Quality Control for Environmental Policy Appraisal Tools: An Empirical Investigation of Relations Between Quality, Quality Control and Effectiveness. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 18:1, pages 121-140.
Read now
Kimmo Jalava, Anne-Mari Haakana & Markku Kuitunen. (2015) The rationale for and practice of EIA follow-up: an analysis of Finnish road projects. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 33:4, pages 255-264.
Read now
Nethi Venkata Sainath & K.S. Rajan. (2015) Meta-analysis of EIA public hearings in the state of Gujarat, India: its role versus the goal of environmental management. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 33:2, pages 148-153.
Read now
Kimmo Jalava, Ismo Pölönen, Pekka Hokkanen & Markku Kuitunen. (2013) The precautionary principle and management of uncertainties in EIAs – analysis of waste incineration cases in Finland. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 31:4, pages 280-290.
Read now
StephanieN.T. Landim & LuisE. Sánchez. (2012) The contents and scope of environmental impact statements: how do they evolve over time?. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 30:4, pages 217-228.
Read now
S. M. Zobaidul Kabir & Salim Momtaz. (2012) The quality of environmental impact statements and environmental impact assessment practice in Bangladesh. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 30:2, pages 94-99.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (24)

Junyeong An, Jinhee Lee, Byung Kwon Lee, El-Sayed Salama, Minpa Lee & Min-Kyu Ji. (2023) Decision support algorithm for efficient environmental impact assessments: Focusing on aquatic environment assessment in South Korea. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 100, pages 107067.
Crossref
Romina Giselle Sales, Antonio Alberto Rodríguez Sousa, Eliseo Yáñez, Laura Blanco Cano, Daniela Raffin, Lara Jatar, Elizabeth Astrada, María Clara Rubio, Pedro A. Aguilera, Rubén D. Quintana & Alejandro J. Rescia. (2023) Degree of importance of demographic and socio-cultural factors in environmental perception: bases for the design of public policies in Argentina and Spain. Environment, Development and Sustainability.
Crossref
Vincent D. Choji, Isaac T. Rampedi, Lee-Ann S. Modley & Ayodeji P. Ifegbesan. (2022) An Evaluation of the Quality of Environmental Impact Assessment Reports in the Mobile Telecommunications Infrastructure Sector: The Case of Plateau State in Nigeria. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19:19, pages 12659.
Crossref
Andreea Nita, Constantina-Alina Hossu, Cristina G. Mitincu & Ioan-Cristian Iojă. (2022) A review of the quality of environmental impact statements with a focus on urban projects from Romania. Ecological Informatics 70, pages 101723.
Crossref
Ana L. Caro-Gonzalez, Javier Toro & Montserrat Zamorano. (2021) Effectiveness of environmental impact statement methods: A Colombian case study. Journal of Environmental Management 300, pages 113659.
Crossref
Ezequiel Zárate-Toledo, Paul Wood & Rodrigo Patiño. (2021) In search of wind farm sustainability on the Yucatan coast: Deficiencies and public perception of Environmental Impact Assessment in Mexico. Energy Policy 158, pages 112525.
Crossref
Sanna Mäkeläinen & Aleksi Lehikoinen. (2021) Biodiversity and bird surveys in Finnish environmental impact assessments and follow-up monitoring. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 87, pages 106532.
Crossref
Tetsuya Kamijo & Guangwei Huang. (2020) Decision factors and benchmarks of EIA report quality for Japan’s cooperation projects. Environment, Development and Sustainability 23:2, pages 2552-2569.
Crossref
Luke A. Sandham, Carla Huysamen, Francois P. Retief, Angus Morrison-Saunders, Alan J. Bond, Jenny Pope & Reece C. Alberts. (2020) Evaluating Environmental Impact Assessment report quality in South African national parks. KOEDOE - African Protected Area Conservation and Science 62:1.
Crossref
Alberto Fonseca & German Marino Rivera Fernández. (2020) Reviewers’ perceptions of the volume of information provided in environmental impact statements: The case for refocusing attention on what is relevant. Journal of Cleaner Production 251, pages 119757.
Crossref
Daniel S. Boshoff. (2019) Of Smoke and Mirrors: (Mis)Communicating EIA Results of Solar Energy Projects in South Africa. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management 21:03, pages 1950014.
Crossref
Salim Momtaz & S.M. Zobaidul Kabir. 2018. Evaluating Environmental and Social Impact Assessment in Developing Countries. Evaluating Environmental and Social Impact Assessment in Developing Countries 185 201 .
A.K.A. Rathi. (2017) Evaluation of project-level environmental impact assessment and SWOT analysis of EIA process in India. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 67, pages 31-39.
Crossref
Tetsuya Kamijo & Guangwei Huang. (2017) Enhancing the discussion of alternatives in EIA using principle component analysis leads to improved public involvement. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 65, pages 63-74.
Crossref
Kultip Suwanteep, Takehiko Murayama & Shigeo Nishikizawa. (2017) The Quality on Public Participation in Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Reports in Thailand. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management 19:02, pages 1750008.
Crossref
Mari Kågström. (2016) Between ‘best’ and ‘good enough’: How consultants guide quality in environmental assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 60, pages 169-175.
Crossref
Samia Saif, Asim Mehmood, Muhammad Nawaz Chaudhry & Sana Akhtar. (2015) Evaluating the Adequacy and Quality of Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) Reports in Punjab, Pakistan. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management 17:03, pages 1550030.
Crossref
Ainhoa González, Riki Thérivel, John Fry & Walter Foley. (2015) Advancing practice relating to SEA alternatives. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 53, pages 52-63.
Crossref
. 2013. Impact Assessment. Impact Assessment 435 468 .
L.A. Sandham, A.J. van Heerden, C.E. Jones, F.P. Retief & A.N. Morrison-Saunders. (2013) Does enhanced regulation improve EIA report quality? Lessons from South Africa. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 38, pages 155-162.
Crossref
Salim Momtaz & S.M. Zobaidul Kabir. 2013. Evaluating Environmental and Social Impact Assessment in Developing Countries. Evaluating Environmental and Social Impact Assessment in Developing Countries 171 187 .
PEKKA HOKKANEN & JORMA JANTUNEN. (2013) A MULTI-VIEW EVALUATION OF THE FINNISH EIA SYSTEM: AN 18-YEAR SUCCESS STORY?. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management 14:04, pages 1250024.
Crossref
Richard K. Morgan, Andrew Hart, Claire Freeman, Brian Coutts, David Colwill & Andrew Hughes. (2012) Practitioners, professional cultures, and perceptions of impact assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 32:1, pages 11-24.
Crossref
Ismo Pölönen, Pekka Hokkanen & Kimmo Jalava. (2011) The effectiveness of the Finnish EIA system — What works, what doesn't, and what could be improved?. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 31:2, pages 120-128.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.