Citations (39)
Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.
Read on this site (6)
Jieqiong Fan, Li-Fang Zhang & Yanbi Hong. (2021) The malleability of thinking styles over one year. Educational Psychology 41:6, pages 748-763.
Read now
Read now
Wei Yuan, Li-Fang Zhang & Mingchen Fu. (2017) Thinking styles and academic stress coping among Chinese secondary school students. Educational Psychology 37:8, pages 1015-1025.
Read now
Read now
Aristoklis Andreas Nicolaou & Xenia Xistouri. (2011) Field dependence/independence cognitive style and problem posing: an investigation with sixth grade students. Educational Psychology 31:5, pages 611-627.
Read now
Read now
Weiqiao Fan, Li‐Fang Zhang & David Watkins. (2010) Incremental validity of thinking styles in predicting academic achievements: an experimental study in hypermedia learning environments. Educational Psychology 30:5, pages 605-623.
Read now
Read now
Li‐Fang Zhang. (2007) Intellectual Styles and Academic Achievement among Senior Secondary School Students in Rural China. Educational Psychology 27:5, pages 675-692.
Read now
Read now
Fernando Doménech Betoret. (2007) The Influence of Students’ and Teachers’ Thinking Styles on Student Course Satisfaction and on Their Learning Process. Educational Psychology 27:2, pages 219-234.
Read now
Read now
Articles from other publishers (33)
Samson John Mgaiwa. (2023) Do university academics’ thinking styles account for their job satisfaction? A cross-sectional study. SN Social Sciences 3:8.
Crossref
Crossref
Ahmad Ahmadi, Arash Ziapour, Javad Yoosefi lebni & Nafiul Mehedi. (2021) Prediction of Academic Motivation Based on Variables of Personality Traits, Academic Self-Efficacy, Academic Alienation and Social Support in Paramedical Students. Community Health Equity Research & Policy 43:2, pages 195-201.
Crossref
Crossref
Sylvio Rudian, Jennifer Haase & Niels Pinkwart. (2022) Predicting Creativity in Online Courses. Predicting Creativity in Online Courses.
Pınar Güner & Hatice Nur Erbay. (2021) Prospective mathematics teachers’ thinking styles and problem-solving skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity 40, pages 100827.
Crossref
Crossref
Özkan KIRMIZI & Nur GÜNEŞ UÇAR. (2021) Exploring the Correlation between Thinking Styles and Social and Academic Integration in English Major Students. SDU International Journal of Educational Studies 8:1, pages 19-35.
Crossref
Crossref
Sérgio Inácio Torres, Graziela Bortz & Katya Luciane de Oliveira. (2020) ADAPTAÇÃO E VALIDAÇÃO SEMÂNTICA DO THINKING STYLES INVENTORY – REVISED II (TSI-R2) PARA AS LICENCIATURAS EM MÚSICA NO BRASIL. Orfeu 5:2.
Crossref
Crossref
Sowmya Sathya. (2020) ECLECTIC 4.0: the new learning model for business schools. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning 10:3, pages 581-590.
Crossref
Crossref
Naemi D. Brandt, Clemens M. Lechner, Julia Tetzner & Beatrice Rammstedt. (2019) Personality, cognitive ability, and academic performance: Differential associations across school subjects and school tracks. Journal of Personality 88:2, pages 249-265.
Crossref
Crossref
Jaime Huincahue, Claudio Gaete-Peralta & Véliz Viviana Garrido. (2019) Thinking styles and computer engineering training: An empirical study. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science Engineering and Education 7:1, pages 21-33.
Crossref
Crossref
Behnoosh Atashzar & Karim Afsharinia. (2018) Effectiveness of the Impact of Hardiness on Increased Happiness and Academic Achievement of Students in Kermanshah City (High School of Medical Science) for the Academic Year 95 - 96. Journal of Clinical Research in Paramedical Sciences In Press:In Press.
Crossref
Crossref
Risnanosanti & Ristontowi. (2018) Students’ thinking styles and their proof writing levels. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 948, pages 012029.
Crossref
Crossref
Tine Nielsen & Svend Kreiner. (2017) Course evaluation for the purpose of development: What can learning styles contribute?. Studies in Educational Evaluation 54, pages 58-70.
Crossref
Crossref
Ayhan Dikici. 2017. Exploring the Benefits of Creativity in Education, Media, and the Arts. Exploring the Benefits of Creativity in Education, Media, and the Arts
136
157
.
José Abdelnour-Nocera, Torkil Clemmensen & Tatiane G. Guimaraes. 2017. Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2017. Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2017
198
217
.
Jieqiong Fan. (2016) The role of thinking styles in career decision-making self-efficacy among university students. Thinking Skills and Creativity 20, pages 63-73.
Crossref
Crossref
Goretti Soroa, Nekane Balluerka, Bernhard Hommel & Aitor Aritzeta. (2015) Assessing interactions between cognition, emotion, and motivation in creativity: The construction and validation of EDICOS. Thinking Skills and Creativity 17, pages 45-58.
Crossref
Crossref
Tzu-Ling Wang & Yi-Kuan Tseng. (2014) DO THINKING STYLES MATTER FOR SCIENCE ACHIEVEMENT AND ATTITUDES TOWARD SCIENCE CLASS IN MALE AND FEMALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL STUDENTS IN TAIWAN?. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 13:3, pages 515-533.
Crossref
Crossref
Robert J. Sternberg. (2015) Book Reviews: Styles of Thinking and Learning: Personal Mirror or Personal Mirage?. The American Journal of Psychology 128:1, pages 115-122.
Crossref
Crossref
Melinde Coetzee & Ingrid L. Potgieter. (2014) The relation of cognitive learning strategies to psychosocial employability attributes amongst black adult learners in the economic and management sciences field. SA Journal of Human Resource Management 14:1.
Crossref
Crossref
Weng-Tink Chooi, Holly Long & Lee Thompson. (2014) The Sternberg Triarchic Abilities Test (Level-H) is a Measure of g. Journal of Intelligence 2:3, pages 56-67.
Crossref
Crossref
Jieqiong Fan & Li-fang Zhang. (2014) The role of perceived parenting styles in thinking styles. Learning and Individual Differences 32, pages 204-211.
Crossref
Crossref
Fernando Doménech-Betoret & Amparo Gómez-Artiga. (2014) The relationship among students' and teachers' thinking styles, psychological needs and motivation. Learning and Individual Differences 29, pages 89-97.
Crossref
Crossref
Qiuzhi Xie, Xiangping Gao & Ronnel B. King. (2013) Thinking styles in implicit and explicit learning. Learning and Individual Differences 23, pages 267-271.
Crossref
Crossref
Stephanie D. Figg, Karen B. Rogers, John McCormick & Renae Low. (2012) Differentiating Low Performance of the Gifted Learner. Journal of Advanced Academics 23:1, pages 53-71.
Crossref
Crossref
Li-fang Zhang. (2012) Why Schools Should Care About Intellectual Styles. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology 11:3, pages 256-270.
Crossref
Crossref
Ahmad Alipour, Nila Akhondy & Khadijeh Aerab-sheybani. (2012) Relationship between handedness and thinking styles in female and male students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 32, pages 22-28.
Crossref
Crossref
Guo-Hai Chen & David Watkins. (2010) Can Student Ratings of Teaching be Predicted by Teaching Styles?. Psychological Reports 106:2, pages 501-512.
Crossref
Crossref
Li-Fang Zhang. (2010) Do age and gender make a difference in the relationship between intellectual styles and abilities?. European Journal of Psychology of Education 25:1, pages 87-103.
Crossref
Crossref
Lorenzo Vigentini. (2009) Using learning technology in university courses: do styles matter?. Multicultural Education & Technology Journal 3:1, pages 17-32.
Crossref
Crossref
Xiaojing Liu, Richard J. Magjuka & Seung-hee Lee. (2008) The effects of cognitive thinking styles, trust, conflict management on online students' learning and virtual team performance. British Journal of Educational Technology 39:5, pages 829-846.
Crossref
Crossref
Anne C. Black & D. Betsy McCoach. (2008) Validity Study of the Thinking Styles Inventory. Journal for the Education of the Gifted 32:2, pages 180-210.
Crossref
Crossref
Birsen Palut. (2008) THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THINKING STYLES AND LEVEL OF EXTERNALITY: A STUDY Of TURKISH FEMALE PRESCHOOL STUDENT TEACHERS. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal 36:4, pages 519-528.
Crossref
Crossref
Li-fang Zhang. (2007) Revisiting thinking styles' contributions to the knowledge and use of and attitudes towards computing and information technology. Learning and Individual Differences 17:1, pages 17-24.
Crossref
Crossref