Abstract
Background: Intratympanic and intravenous gadolinium administration is used to visualise endolymphatic hydrops.
Aims/objectives: The goal of this study was to compare the image quality between intratympanic (IT-method) and intravenous (IV-method) gadolinium administration using three-dimensional inversion recovery with real reconstruction (3D real IR) sequences.
Materials and methods: A number of 152 patients with Meniere’s disease were included. The 3D real IR sequence was performed 24 h after IT administration or 4 h after IV administration. The detection rate of endolymphatic hydrops, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the two methods were compared. Specifically, the average image scores of the two methods were evaluated by two radiologists.
Results: The SNRROI and CNRs of the IT-method were higher than those of the IV-method, whereas no significant difference between the IT-method and IV-method with regard to the SNRB was found. The average image scores were 3.49 ± 0.12 and 3.30 ± 0.12 for the IT-method and IV-method, respectively (p = .229). No statistically significant difference was found between two methods in terms of the detection rate of endolymphatic hydrops.
Conclusions and significance: IT-method images can display endolymphatic hydrops more precisely than IV-method images. The IV-method can be used as an alternative to the IT-method in clinical applications to some extent.
背景:鼓室内和静脉注射钆是用来显现内淋巴积水。
目的:本研究的目的是比较鼓室内(IT法)和静脉内(IV法)钆给药(使用三维倒置恢复和真实重建(3D真红外线)序列)的图像质量。
材料与方法:对152例梅尼埃病患者进行回顾性分析。在鼓室内注射24小时或静脉注射4小时后进行三维真红外线序列分析。比较了两种方法的内淋巴积水检出率、信噪比(SNR)和反差噪声比(CNR)。两种方法的平均图像评分由两名放射科医生进行评估。
结果:IT法的信噪比和反差噪声比均高于IV法, 而IT法与IV法在信噪比方面无显著性差异。IT法和IV法的平均图像评分分别为3.49 ± 0.12和3.30 ± 0.12(P = 0.229)。两种方法对内淋巴积水的检出率无统计学差异。
结论及意义:鼓室内注射法比静脉注射法更准确地显示内淋巴积液。静脉注射法在一定程度上可在临床应用中作为鼓室内法的替代方法。
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.