Abstract
Background: It has been reported that head-up sleep (HUS) prevents free-floating otoliths from entering canals and that vertical recognition training (VRT) promotes vestibular compensation.
Aims/objectives: We would like to assess HUS and VRT for intractable motion-evoked dizziness, including possible benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV).
Materials and methods: 162 patients diagnosed with intractable motion-evoked dizziness of unknown origin were enrolled and randomly divided into the following four groups: HUS−/VRT−, HUS+/VRT−, HUS−/VRT+, and HUS+/VRT+. The at-home interventions comprised HUS with an upper head position of 45° when lying down and VRT with a right down-left down 30° head inclination while watching the vertical index.
Results: At the post-treatment 6th month, visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for vertiginous sensation were significantly lower in the HUS+/VRT + group than in the HUS+/VRT − and HUS−/VRT + groups, which were in turn significantly lower than those in the HUS−/VRT − group. VAS scores in the HUS−/VRT + group of patients with abnormal subjective visual vertical (SVV) were significantly lower than those in the HUS+/VRT − group, while those in the HUS+/VRT − group of patients with normal SVV were significantly lower than those in the HUS−/VRT + group.
Conclusions: HUS and/or VRT is a good initial treatment for patients with intractable undiagnosed motion-evoked dizziness, including possible BPPV.
Chinese abstract
背景:据报道, 头高位睡眠(HUS)可防止游离耳石进入耳道, 垂直识别训练(VRT)可促进前庭代偿。
目的:我们希望能评估HUS和VRT对难治性运动性眩晕(包括可能的良性阵发性位置性眩晕(BPPV))的疗效。
材料与方法:将162例不明原因顽固性运动性眩晕患者随机分为4组:HUS-/VRT-、HUS+/VRT-、HUS-/VRT+、HUS-/VRT+和HUS+/VRT+。居家干预包括躺下时头上部位置为45°的HUS和观察垂直指数时右下左下30°的VRT。
结果:治疗6个月后, HUS+/VRT+组眩晕感觉视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分显著低于HUS+/VRT-组和HUS-/VRT+组, 后者又显著低于HUS-/VRT-组。HUS-/VRT+组主观垂直视觉异常(SVV)患者的VAS评分显著低于HUS-/VRT+组, 而HUS-/VRT+组SVV正常患者的VAS评分显著低于HUS-/VRT+组。
结论:HUS和/或VRT是治疗难治性未确诊运动诱发性眩晕(包括可能的BPPV)的良好初始治疗方法.
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank Dr. Masashi Choubi, a registered statistician (certificate number: 622017) for helpful advice on statistical analyses and Dr. Adam Phillips from Edanz Group (www.edanzediting.com/ac) for editing a draft of this manuscript.
Author contributions
Tadashi Kitahara and Akira Horinaka: study design, data interpretation, and writing. Tomoyuki Shiozaki and Taeko Ito: data collection and analysis. Yoshiro Wada, Toshiaki Yamanaka, and Kazuhiko Nario: data interpretation.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).