108
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The impact of whitegrub (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) damage on growth of Eucalyptus grandis and Acacia mearnsii plantation trees in South Africa

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 71-80 | Received 29 Aug 2019, Accepted 17 Jun 2022, Published online: 26 Jul 2022
 

ABSTRACT

Eucalyptus grandis and Acacia mearnsii are among the South African forest industry’s most planted commercial species. Whitegrubs are high-status pests affecting plantation forestry; they are root-feeding insects and cause poor seedling growth and elevated mortality. The aim of this study was to elucidate the impact of whitegrub damage on the growth of E. grandis and A. mearnsii trees during the first year of the establishment stage in sites previously planted with A. mearnsii in the KwaZulu-Natal Midlands of South Africa. The hypothesis was that the prophylactic application of insecticides against whitegrubs would increase tree height at six or 12 months after planting. Seven insecticides were assessed in 12 treatments over three trials in Bloemendal, KwaZulu-Natal. Statistical analyses were performed using PRIMER and SAS. Whitegrubs were the predominant mortality factor (17.1%), followed by pathogens (3.3%) and 12 other factors that cumulatively caused the remaining (7.0%) mortality. Pegylis sommeri, Schizonycha affinis and two unknown Maladera species were the most important, typical and prevalent whitegrub species, but their ranking differed between A. mearnsii and E. grandis, suggesting a host preference. The prophylactic application of insecticides against whitegrubs significantly increased tree height for E. grandis. Acacia mearnsii tree height, however, did not consistently show a significant effect with insecticide control, presumably because of additional mortality by pathogens. The crop-rotation scenario may have potentially benefited E. grandis over A. mearnsii and warrants further investigation. Whitegrubs can kill seedlings and reduce tree height when left uncontrolled.

Acknowledgements

We greatly appreciated the assistance of numerous commercial forestry employees in planting and maintaining several study trials. We thank Mr Giovanni Tovar Guayabo for his support in the statistical analyses. We also appreciate the valuable comments made by anonymous reviewers.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

Important facets of this work were supported and financed by the Institute for Commercial Forestry Research (ICFR) and its contributor forestry enterprises and by National Research Foundation (NRF)/Research and Innovation Support and Management (RISA) through its Innovation Doctoral Block Grant 2016, S&F – Innovation Doctoral Scholarships (No. 105069:2016).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 251.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.