188
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Optimizing Thermoacoustic Characterization Experiments for Identifiability Improves Both Parameter Estimation Accuracy and Closed-Loop Controller Robustness Guarantees

ORCID Icon, &
Pages 2186-2211 | Received 30 Jul 2020, Accepted 30 Nov 2020, Published online: 12 Jan 2021
 

ABSTRACT

This article examines the degree to which optimizing a Rijke tube experiment can improve the accuracy of thermoacoustic model parameter estimation, thereby facilitating robust stability control. We use a one-dimensional thermoacoustic model to describe the combustion dynamics in a Rijke tube. This model contains two unknown parameters that relate velocity perturbations to heat release rate oscillations, namely, a time delay τ and amplification factor β. The parameters are estimated from experiments where the system input is the acoustic excitation from a loudspeaker and the output is the pressure response captured by a microphone. Our work is grounded in the insight that optimizing an experiment’s design for higher Fisher identifiability leads to more accurate parameter estimates. The novel goal of this paper is to apply this insight in the laboratory using a flame-driven Rijke tube setup. For comparison purposes, we conduct a benchmark experiment with a broadband chirp signal as the excitation input. Next, we excite the Rijke tube at two frequencies optimized for Fisher identifiability. Repeats of both experiments show that the optimal experiment achieves parameter estimates with uncertainties at least one order of magnitude smaller than the benchmark. With smaller parameter estimate uncertainties, an LQG controller designed to attenuate combustion instabilities is able to achieve stronger robustness guarantees, quantified in terms of closed-loop structured singular values that account for parameter estimation uncertainty.

Acknowledgments

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. CMMI-1728307. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation [CMMI-1728307].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 1,493.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.