Does simulation-based training in medical education need additional stressors? An experimental study

Abstract

The increased curricular integration of simulation-based training (SBT) in medical education is accompanied by researchers’ calls to examine the effectiveness of SBT. We address conflicting results regarding effects of an added stressor on learning outcomes. In an experimental setting, one group of medical students (N = 20) performed cardiopulmonary resuscitation on a patient simulator. For a second group (N = 21) the scenario differed in that they encountered a defect defibrillator. We found participants of both groups to show increased biological stress-levels, independent of group allocation. Paradoxically, participants who encountered the equipment failure subjectively reported less stress. We discuss the implications of the comparable high stress levels in both groups with regards to future studies. We further discuss the result regarding subjective stress levels within the framework of attribution theory.

Practitioner summary: The results of our experimental study underline the need for evidence-based choices of additional stressors for the design of simulation scenarios. We describe the choice of stimuli and setting in detail to maximise practical value for the construction of simulation-based medical trainings.

Keywords:

• Simulation-based training
• high-fidelity simulator
• stress responses
• performance
• learning

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.