852
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Service segment competition: size or value, which matters?

ORCID Icon, , & ORCID Icon
Pages 1281-1299 | Received 07 Oct 2019, Accepted 15 Jan 2020, Published online: 30 Jan 2020
 

Abstract

We study a service market with two firms: one that provides regular and another that provides premium services. Customers are delay sensitive and heterogeneous in evaluating the service level. We study two competition games that differ in segmentation-marketing strategies. One is the size-based competition in which firms compete on the segment size dimension, and the other is the value-based competition in which firms compete on the segment target (regarding customer valuation) dimension. For both games, the Nash equilibrium always exists, and the (Pareto dominant) equilibrium is unique. Interestingly, the premium service provider's effective arrival rate can be increasing in its competitor's service rate in the value-based game. Moreover, we capture the conditions for the equilibrium market as either a monopoly or a duopoly and show that size-based competition helps sustain service variety. We also show that the prices are reduced in the value-based game; the premium (regular) service provider serves more (fewer) customers in the value-based game than in the size-based game. Our results show that value-based competition is more intensive in the sense that the number of customers who are served, customer surplus and social welfare are higher, while the total revenue of two firms is lower in the value-based competition than in the size-based competition.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Supplemental data

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed at http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1722328.

Notes

1 For the M/M/c case, we check that it is true for c = 2, 3; we believe that it continues to hold for c>3. For the M/G/c case, we approximate its expected waiting time with Kingman's law, i.e. E[WM/G/c]=((1+cv)/2)E[WM/M/c].

2 Some branches of the best response functions are not piecewise linear functions. Here, for convenience, we replace the curves with straight lines in the figures. This treatment is without loss of generality because the existence and uniqueness of equilibrium depend only on the signs of slopes of curves and lines.

Additional information

Funding

This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC: 71801096, 71925002, 71731006, 71571070, and 71902018), the Project funded by China Postdoctoral Science Foundation under 2019M650202, the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, SCUT (x2gs/D2191820), the Project supported by GDHVPS (2017), and the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong (GRF PolyU 15526716).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 973.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.