Impact of enhanced Osmia bicornis (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) populations on pollination and fruit quality in commercial sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) orchards

Abstract

The impact on pollination of supplementing wild pollinators with commercially reared Osmia bicornis in commercial orchards growing the self-fertile sweet cherry variety “Stella” was investigated in each of two years. The quality characteristics used by retailers to determine market value of fruit were compared when insect pollination was by wild pollinators only, or wild pollinators supplemented with O. bicornis released at recommended commercial rates. No effect of treatment on the number of fruit set or subsequent rate of growth was recorded. However, supplemented pollination resulted in earlier fruit set when compared to pollination by wild pollinators alone and offered the potential benefit of a larger proportion of the crop reaching optimum quality within a narrower time range, resulting in more consistent produce. Retailers use five key quality criteria in assessment of market value of cherries (the weight of individual fruit, width at the widest point, fruit colour, sugar content and firmness). Price paid to growers depends both on meeting the criteria and consistency between fruit in these characteristics. In both years, the commercial criteria were met in full in both treatments, but harvested fruit following supplemented pollination were consistently larger and heavier compared to those from the wild pollinator treatment. In the year where supplemented pollination had the greatest impact on the timing of fruit set, fruit size and sugar content were also less variable than when pollination was by wild species only. The implications for the commercial use of O. bicornis in cherry orchards are considered.

Keywords:

• Solitary bee
• sweet cherry
• fruit set
• fruit quality
• Osmia bicornis
• pollination

Acknowledgments

We thank Chris Whittles of the Mason Bee Company Ltd. for his generous support in providing the solitary bees used in this study, Andrew Hunt of Lower Hope Farm Ltd. for provision of the experimental site and use of quality assessment equipment, and Keith Ward of Syngenta Ltd. for advice on statistical analysis.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by a Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) CASE Award under Grant BB/M503447/1.