865
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Bobbing for Bad Apples: Accreditation, Quantitative Performance Measures, and the Identification of Low-Performing Colleges

& ORCID Icon
Pages 427-461 | Received 23 Aug 2017, Accepted 25 Jul 2018, Published online: 15 Oct 2018
 

ABSTRACT

Recent trends in higher education (rising debt, school closures, increasing tuition) have increased interest in improving accountability and oversight in U.S. higher education beyond current accreditation practices. Common solutions include using quantitative measures like graduation and default rates to benchmark performance. Using historical data on accreditation actions, we compare the performance of a hypothetical quantitative evaluation system to contemporary accreditation standards in identifying low-performing schools. We find first that schools facing accreditation sanctions are, on average, also low performing on the quantitative outcomes we consider. However, if we use this average performance as a benchmark to identify other low-performing schools, then a substantial portion of the higher education sector would be implicated. These results raise questions about the capacity of a purely quantitative evaluation system to narrowly identify low-performing schools. We conclude with a discussion of the issues concerning data, equity, and other considerations for higher education accountability moving forward.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Notes

1. Downloaded October 1, 2016, from http://ope.ed.gov/accreditation/GetDownLoadFile.aspx.

2. These rates have been criticized for including only first-time, full-time, degree-seeking students and for poorly tracking student transfers (U.S. Department of Education, Citation2014).

3. Note that the threshold-setting school was not the same for each measure. The lowest-performing school based on the graduation rate of the schools that lost their accreditation was not the same as the lowest-performing school in terms of default rate. Yet there were colleges that performed worse than both of these schools on both measures.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 112.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.