ABSTRACT
Individuals’ deception detection ability during either a face-to-face (FtF) interaction or through computer-mediated communication (CMC) was explored under more naturalistic conditions where they were not forewarned that deception may be involved. Participants discussed a social issue either in a room together or by instant messaging from separate rooms. Prior to discussion, some participants were asked to deceive their partner regarding their actual opinion on the issue. Results showed that mode of communication did not influence participants’ deception detection accuracy rate, nor their truth bias. Regardless of mode of communication, deceptive participants experienced the same level of physiological arousal as the non-deceivers. In contrast, deceivers reported experiencing higher levels of anxiety but only in the FtF condition. Findings highlight how for different communication modalities, a multitude of interactive factors may influence deception detection.
Data availability statement
The data described in this article are openly available in the Open Science Framework at https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/7UNBM.
Open scholarship
This article has earned the Center for Open Science badge for Open Materials. The materials are openly accessible at https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/7UNBM.
Disclosure Statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Additional information
Funding
Notes on contributors
Michelle Eskritt
Michelle Eskritt is a Professor in the Department of Psychology at Mount Saint Vincent University. She researches the development of nonverbal communication as well as cognitive offloading.
Brandon Fraser
Brandon Fraser conducted some of the data in the present article as part of his honours in Psychology at Mount Saint Vincent University. He is now a physiotherapist.
Sandra Bosacki
Sandra Bosacki is a Professor in the Faculty of Education at Brock University. She does research on socioemotional development.