1,065
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Focus: Rethinking Professional Geographical Practice in a Time of Climate Crisis; Part Two: Debate Two

The AAG’s Emissions Problem: Achieving Carbon Neutrality in a Post-offset World

Pages 178-181 | Received 16 Nov 2020, Accepted 16 May 2021, Published online: 30 Jul 2021
 

Abstract

Professional organizations like the American Association of Geographers (AAG) face a conundrum and an ethical dilemma: Do we continue to drive and fly around the country, and world, to share our research—much of it examining topics related to resource extraction, uneven development, crises of capitalism, justice, and human rights—while the very action of travel contributes to global climate change and exacerbates many of the problems we explore in our work? In this article I suggest that as AAG members work to lower and potentially neutralize the carbon footprint of the annual meeting, we must turn a critical eye to the limits and possibilities of the carbon offset mechanism and explore emerging alternatives. These alternatives, I argue, are part of an emerging “post-offset world,” where carbon removal and drawdown activities carry the name “offset” but do not fit the definition.

美国地理学家协会(AAG)等专业组织面临着一个难题和道德困境:我们是否应当继续在国内和世界各地驾车或飞行, 去分享我们的研究?我们的研究, 大部分是关于资源开采、不均衡发展、资本主义危机、正义和人权, 而旅行本身恰恰助长了全球气候变化, 加剧了我们所研究的问题。在这篇文章中, 我建议, 随着AAG成员致力于降低并可能中和AAG年会的碳足迹, 我们必须将目光转向碳补偿机制的局限和可能性, 并探索新的替代方案。我认为, 这些替代方案是新兴“后补偿世界”的一部分。在这个世界, 碳消除和削减行为具备“补偿”的名义, 但并不符合其定义。

Organizaciones profesionales como la Asociación Americana de Geógrafos (AAG) enfrentan un problema, y un dilema ético: ¿Seguimos manejando carro y volando alrededor del país, y del mundo, para compartir nuestra investigación ––gran parte de la cual examina tópicos relacionados con la extracción de recursos, desarrollo desigual, crisis del capitalismo, justicia y derechos humanos––al tiempo que la propia acción de viajar contribuye al cambio climático global y exacerba muchos de los problemas que exploramos en nuestro trabajo? En este artículo sugiero que los miembros de la AAG trabajemos para bajar y potencialmente neutralizar la huella de carbono de la reunión anual, tornando un ojo crítico a los límites y posibilidades del mecanismo de compensación del carbono y explorando las alternativas emergentes. Estas alternativas, arguyo, hacen parte del “mundo poscompensación” que está surgiendo, donde la remoción del carbono y las actividades de reducción llevan el nombre de “compensación”, así no concuerden con la definición.

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Lauren Gifford

LAUREN GIFFORD is a Postdoctoral Researcher in the Department of Geography, Development and Environment at the University of Arizona and Affiliate Faculty in the Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at Metropolitan State University of Denver, Denver, CO 80204. E-mail: [email protected]. Her research interests include climate policy, conservation, carbon markets, offsets, and justice.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 198.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.