261
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Efficacy and safety of preoperative transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

, & ORCID Icon
Pages 1070-1079 | Received 17 Jan 2022, Accepted 20 Mar 2022, Published online: 02 Apr 2022
 

Abstract

Objective

The aim of the study was to compare preoperative transcatheter arterial chemotherapy (TACE) plus liver resection (LR) with liver resection (LR) alone for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Materials and methods

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, web of science and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) were searched from their initiation until 24 August 2021. Eligible languages were English and Chinese. This study includes only RCT and cohort studies. The primary outcome was the prognostic factors including overall survival rate (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and we also research the operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative complication.

Results

Twenty-nine trials (2 RCTs and 27 cohorts) were included, containing a total of 22023 patients, compared with hepatic resection, preoperative TACE plus LR shows the benefit of RFS (Hazard Ratio (HR)=0.80, 95%CI = [0.73–0.88], p < .001), and the combined therapy was associated with a higher OS for patients with HCC in Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) B stage (HR = 0.76, 95%CI = [0.60–0.96], p = .024). In terms of safety, combination therapy is related to less intraoperative blood loss (Weighted Mean Difference (WMD)=-11.17, 95%CI = [-21.79 to −0.54], p = .039); and there’s no statistical significance in postoperative complication (Risk Ratio (RR)=0.99, 95%CI= [0.90–1.08], p = 0.771) and operative time (WMD = 7.57, 95%CI = [-5.07 to 20.20], p = .240).

Conclusion

TACE prior to surgery should be recommended as a routine treatment for HCC patients, especially BCLC B stage HCC, in view of its benefits for RFS and OS. Large, multicenter, and blinded randomized trials should be performed to confirm these findings.

Ethical approval

All analyses were based on previous published studies, thus no ethical approval and patient consent are required.

Author contributions

Mi SZ and Nie Y wrote the main manuscript and fully participated in all analyses. Xie CM contributed to the study concept and design. All authors participated in literature search, data extraction, and quality assessment. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Data availability statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Additional information

Funding

Certificate of China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [Grant No. 2018M641848]; Certificate of Heilongjiang Postdoctoral Financial Assistance [Grant No. LBH-Z18118]; The Foundation of the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University [Grant No. 201713020]; The Heilongjiang Province General Undergraduate Colleges and Universities Young Innovative Talents Training Plan [Grant No. UNPYSCT2017065].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 336.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.