641
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Communication, carcerality, and neoliberal stigma: the case of hunger and food assistance in the United States

Pages 225-242 | Received 04 May 2021, Accepted 17 Jan 2022, Published online: 15 Jun 2022
 

ABSTRACT

Drawing on three strains of critical theory – Foucauldian biopolitics, critical race theory, and the work of sociologist Loic Wacquant – I argue that neoliberal stigma is foundational to the design of the food (assistance) system. Neoliberal stigma is constituted in the discursive practices of shame, suspicion, and surveillance, which are communicative and carceral technologies used to discipline poor and racialized communities in their efforts to manage hunger and poverty. These communicative technologies are rooted in anti-poor, racist, and carceral logics and are deployed against Black and Brown bodies negatively impacting health and social wellbeing. Drawing on the voices of people with lived experiences of hunger, I demonstrate the mundane and exceptional ways in which shame, suspicion, and surveillance emerge in discursive practices surrounding food assistance and how these practices enjoin food assistance and carcerality into a ‘single organizational contraption.’ The analysis ends with three broad interventions required to disrupt neoliberal stigma amid racist violence.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Notes

1 Some interview data presented in this article are reprinted with permission from de Souza, R. (2019) Feeding the Other: Whiteness, Privilege, and Neoliberal Stigma in Food Pantries. MIT Press. Further methodological details can also be found in the book.

2 Over the last few years, the acronym BIPOC has become a preferred term compared to the historical ‘people of color’ (POC) terminology. However, like any attempt to label people, the term BIPOC is also coarse. Accepting the limitations of language, I use several terms interchangeably (i.e., BIPOC, people of color, Black and Brown, and racialized groups/ bodies) when referring to groups racialized by white supremacy.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 192.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.