291
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Clinical Features - Original Research

Association of physical activity on the functional connectivity of the hippocampal–orbitofrontal pathway

ORCID Icon, , &
Pages 290-294 | Received 29 Mar 2018, Accepted 05 Nov 2018, Published online: 25 Nov 2018
 

ABSTRACT

Objective: The objective of the study is to examine the association between physical activity and hippocampal–orbitofrontal functional connectivity.

Methods: Data from the Nathan Kline Institute-Rockland Sample was utilized, which consisted of 366 participants (Mage = 43 years; 63% female). Physical activity was self-reported using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire. Hippocampal–orbitofrontal functional connectivity was assessed from magnetic resonance imaging.

Results: Moderate-intensity physical activity was not statistically significantly associated with left hippocampal–orbitofrontal connectivity (β = 0.001; 95% CI: −0.02, 0.03; P = 0.90) or right hippocampal–orbitofrontal connectivity (β = 0.01; 95% CI: −0.01, 0.04; P = 0.22). However, vigorous-intensity physical activity was statistically significantly associated with right hippocampal–orbitofrontal connectivity (β = 0.01; 95% CI: 0.004, 0.02; P = 0.002).

Discussion: Habitual engagement in intense physical activity was associated with greater hippocampal–orbitofrontal connectivity, while moderate activity engagement was not. This may have important implications for the exercise neurobiology field in the context of exercise and memory function, suggesting that intense activity may facilitate cognitive/memory functions. However, our findings should be interpreted with caution given the relatively weak associations that were observed.

Declaration of interest

The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties. Peer reviewers on this manuscript have no relevant financial relationships to disclose.

Additional information

Funding

No funding was used to prepare this manuscript. Data used in the preparation of this article were obtained from the Nathan Kline Institute-Rockland Sample (NKI-RS), approved by this respective ethics committee. The NKI-RS project was supported by NIMH BRAINS R01MH094639-01.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 666.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.