Estimating soil organic carbon levels in cultivated soils from satellite image using parametric and data-driven methods

ABSTRACT

Soil organic carbon (SOC) is one of the key soil components for cultivated soils. SOC is regularly monitored and mapped to improve the quality, health, and productivity of the soil. However, traditional SOC-level monitoring is expensive for land managers and farmers. Estimating SOC using satellite imagery provides an easy, efficient, and cost-effective way to monitor surface SOC levels. The objective of this study was to estimate the surface SOC distribution in selected soils of Major Land Resource Areas (MLRA), 102A (Rolling Till Plain, Brookings County, SD), and 103 (Central Iowa and Minnesota Till Prairies, Lac qui Parle County, MN), using satellite imagery with different resolutions (Landsat 8 and PlanetScope). The dominant soils in the study area are Haplustolls, Calciustolls, and Endoaquolls, which are formed in silty sediments, local silty alluvium, and till. Landsat 8 and PlanetScope spectral bands were used to develop SOC prediction models. Parametric and data-driven methods were employed to predict the SOC. Multiple linear regression and Linear Spatial Mixed Model (LSMM) were used on the Landsat 8 and PlanetScope data. In addition to the parametric models, Regression Trees and Random Forest were also employed on both satellite data. The results showed that reduced LSMM provided the lowest RMSE, which are 0.401 and 0.367 for Landsat 8 and PlanetScope, respectively. Furthermore, the random forest has the highest RPD and RPIQ for Landsat 8 (RPD of 2.67 and RPIQ of 2.49) and PlanetScope (RPD of 2.85 and RPIQ of 3.7). In all cases, models obtained from PlanetScope are better than those obtained from Landsat 8.

KEYWORDS:

• Linear Spatial Mixed Model
• random forest
• Regression tree
• remote sensing
• soil organic carbon

Acknowledgement

The authors are grateful to the Republic of Turkey Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, South Dakota State University; Agronomy, Horticulture and Plant Science Department; Mathematics and Statistics Department; and SD Agricultural Experiment Station; USDA-AFRI. The authors would like to thank the editor and two reviewers for their careful reading and constructive comments that led to substantial improvements in the article. The authors would like to thank Stephanie Liebl for proofreading and providing helpful comments on the manuscript.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Correction Statement

This article has been corrected with minor changes. These changes do not impact the academic content of the article.

Additional information

Funding

Funded by USDA – AFRI, and Republic of Turkey Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry.