Studying policy advisory systems: beyond the Westminster-bias?

ABSTRACT

Research on policy advisory systems has rapidly proliferated over the last decade and now focuses on advisory system change dynamics. Yet, empirical studies predominantly focus on the study of policy advisory systems in Westminster systems and it is those studies upon which theorization relies. This paper argues that this Westminster-prevalence resulted in a Westminster-bias of our understanding of policy advisory systems and directs attention to more abstract or general analytical dimensions that may be relevant for the comparative study of policy advisory systems and research on advice systems in transitional and developing countries.

KEYWORDS:

• Policy advisory systems
• change dynamics
• externalization
• politicization
• Westminster-systems

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.

Notes on contributor

Thurid Hustedt is Professor of Public Administration and Management at the Hertie School of Governance. Her research focuses on public sector change dynamics, political–administrative relations and comparative public administration.

ORCID

Thurid Hustedt http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9653-5306