162
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Aricles

The anxiety caused by abnormal results of Down syndrome screening tests

, , &
Pages 2893-2898 | Published online: 22 Aug 2022
 

Abstract

The objective of our survey was to evaluate the anxiety experienced by women receiving abnormal results of prenatal Down syndrome screening by an electronic anonymous survey. Anxiety level was evaluated by a six-item Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Of 559 respondents, high anxiety scores were reported in the majority (86.0%). Higher anxiety scores were noted in women informed of the abnormal result by the caregiver vs. written answer. 59.1% of the respondents preferred the risk reported as percentage, while only 4.4% gave precedence to the current form (e.g. 1 in 100). The participants noted several factors which could relieve their anxiety, including an explanatory booklet (72.4%) or a website (77.9%). In conclusion, women receiving abnormal results of Down syndrome screening experience significant anxiety. Efforts should be made to relieve this distress, including changing the historical ratio risk format to percentage, adding a non-directive verbal annotation, an explanatory website and improving health professionals' understanding of the exact statistical meaning of the risk.

    Impact statement

  • What is already known on this subject? Abnormal results of prenatal screening for Down syndrome might cause the women significant anxiety. Several simple methods are able to relieve this distress; however, they are frequently not implemented in the routine practice.

  • What the results of this study add? We show that abnormal results of the screening tests are associated with high anxiety scores in the majority of women (86.0%). The majority of the respondents preferred the risk reported as percentage (vs. historical representation as a ratio). The participants noted several factors which could relieve their anxiety, including an explanatory booklet or a website.

  • What the implications are of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Based on the results, we discuss the numerous ways able to available alleviate the distress.

Disclosure statement

  • No financial support of funding was received for this work.

  • All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interests.

This survey was considered exempt from the Institutional Review Board (following discussion with the chairperson of Carmel Medical Centre Helsinki committee).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.